Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison between APD and CAPD for preservation of residual renal function

From: Which clinical conditions are most suitable for induction of automated peritoneal dialysis?

Study (published year)

Study design

Setting countries

Data source

N (CAPD, APD)

Duration of observation

Results

de Fijter CW et al. (1994) [15]

Prospective Randomized study

Netherlands (1988–1991)

Single

81 (41, 41)

24 months

Ns.

Hiroshige K et al. (1996) [22]

Prospective cohort study

Japan (1992–1994)

Single center

18 (5, 13)

6 months

CAPD was better

Bro S et al. (1999) [16]

Prospective randomized study

Denmark (1995–1999)

Multicenter

34 (17, 17)

6 months

Ns.

Hufnagel G et al. (1999) [92]

Prospective cohort study

France (1995–1997)

Single center

36 (18, 18)

12 months

CAPD was better

Galler P et al. (2000) [93]

Prospective cohort study

Spain (N/A)

Single center

20 (11, 9)

12 months

Ns.

Hamada C et al. (2000) [94]

Prospective cohort study

Japan (N/A)

Single

34 (17, 17)

24 months

Ns. (but decrease of urinary volume was faster in CAPD)

Moist LM et al. (2000) [95]

National Registry data

USA (1997)

USRDS dialysis morbidity and mortality

1032 (722, 310)

8–18 months

Ns.

Singhal MK et al. (2000) [96]

Prospective cohort study

Canada (1994–1997)

Single center

242 (211, 31)

27 ± 14 months

Ns.

Holley JL et al. (2001) [97]

Retrospective database

USA (1991–2000)

N/A

184 (70, 114)

<9 months

Ns.

Hidaka H et al. (2003) [98]

Prospective cohort study

Japan (1995–2001)

Single center

34 (27, 7)

12~42 months

CAPD was better

Johnson DW et al. (2003) [99]

Prospective cohort study

Australia (1995–2001)

Single center

146 (134, 12)

21 ± 15 months

Ns.

Rodriguez-Carmona A et al. (2004) [100]

Prospective observational study

Spain (1995–2001)

Single center

104 (53, 51)

12–24 months

CAPD was better

Balasubramanian et al. (2011) [11]

Retrospective observational study

UK (2003–2008)

Single center

277 (130, 147)

5 years

Ns.

Cnossen TT et al. (2011) [90]

Retrospective observational study

UK (2001–2008)

Multicenter

620 (179, 441)

450 days

Ns.

Michael WM et al. (2011) [101]

Prospective cohort study

Netherlands (1997–2006)

Multicenter (NECOSAD)

583 (505, 78)

3 months–3 years

Ns.

Roszkowska-Blaim M et al. (2012) [80]

Retrospective observational study

Poland (1992–2009)

Multicenter

101 children (44, 57)

36 months

CAPD was better

Pérez Fontán M et al. (2015) [32]

Retrospective observational study

Spain (2000–2010)

Multicenter

493 (365, 125)

6–24 months

CAPD was better when APD was introduced during induction period of PD

  1. Ref. Bieber SD et al. [7]
  2. Ns. not significant between CAPD and APD, N/A not available in the text, NECOSAD Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis, USRDA US Renal Data System