Annual Dialysis Data Report 2014, JSDT Renal Data Registry (JRDR)

Masakane, Ikuto; Nakai, Shigeru; Ogata, Satoshi; Kimata, Naoki; Hanafusa, Norio; Hamano, Takayuki; Wakai, Kenji; Wada, Atsushi; Nitta, Kosaku

doi:10.1186/s41100-017-0097-8

Renal Replacement Therapy

Table 46 Patient distribution by modality and combination of PD

From: Annual Dialysis Data Report 2014, JSDT Renal Data Registry (JRDR)

				Main dialysis methods^a
				In-center HD	HDF	Hemo-filtration	Hemo-adsorption	Home HD	PD	Total	(%)	(%)
Combined use of PD and another modality	Patients who did not undergo PD (Non-PD patients)	Non-PD + non-catheter patients		255,316	43,239	91	1630	518	0	300,794	(99.9)	(97.0)
		(%)		(84.9)	(14.4)	(0.0)	(0.5)	(0.2)	(0.0)	(100.0)
		Non-PD + catheter patients^b		245	22	1	0	1	0	269	(0.1)	(0.1)
		(%)		(91.1)	(8.2)	(0.4)	(0.0)	(0.4)	(0.0)	(100.0)
		Total number of non-PD patients		255,561	43,261	92	1630	519	0	301,063	(100.0)	(97.1)
		(%)		(84.9)	(14.4)	(0.0)	(0.5)	(0.2)	(0.0)	(100.0)
	Patients who underwent PD (PD patients)^c	PD only		0	0	0	0	0	7188	7188	(79.7)	(2.3)
		(%)		(0.0)	(0.0)	(0.0)	(0.0)	(0.0)	(100.0)	(100.0)
		Patients who underwent PD and another modality (PD + HD patients)	PD + HD 1/week	0	0	0	0	0	1544	1544	(17.1)	(0.5)
			(%)	(0.0)	(0.0)	(0.0)	(0.0)	(0.0)	(100.0)	(100.0)
			PD + HD 2/week	28	8	0	0	0	141	177	(2.0)	(0.1)
			(%)	(15.8)	(4.5)	(0.0)	(0.0)	(0.0)	(79.7)	(100.0)
			PD + HD 3/week	29	10	0	0	1	0	40	(0.4)	(0.0)
			(%)	(72.5)	(25.0)	(0.0)	(0.0)	(2.5)	(0.0)	(100.0)
			PD + HD 4/week	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	(0.0)	(0.0)
			(%)	(100.0)	(0.0)	(0.0)	(0.0)	(0.0)	(0.0)	(100.0)
			PD + HD other frequencies	8	2	0	0	0	63	73	(0.8)	(0.0)
			(%)	(11.0)	(2.7)	(0.0)	(0.0)	(0.0)	(86.3)	(100.0)
			Total PD + HD patients	66	20	0	0	1	1748	1835	(20.3)	(0.6)
			(%)	(3.6)	(1.1)	(0.0)	(0.0)	(0.1)	(95.3)	(100.0)
		Total number of PD patients		66	20	0	0	1	8936	9023	(100.0)	(2.9)
		(%)		(0.7)	(0.2)	(0.0)	(0.0)	(0.0)	(99.0)	(100.0)
	Total number of non-PD and PD patients			255,627	43,281	92	1630	520	8936	310,086		(100.0)
	(%)			(82.4)	(14.0)	(0.0)	(0.5)	(0.2)	(2.9)	(100.0)
	Unspecified			14	2	0	0	1	5	22
	(%)			(63.6)	(9.1)	(0.0)	(0.0)	(4.5)	(22.7)	(100.0)
	No information available			0	0	0	0	0	0	0
	(%)			–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Total				255,641	43,283	92	1630	521	8941	310,108
(%)				(82.4)	(14.0)	(0.0)	(0.5)	(0.2)	(2.9)	(100.0)

Note: The selection of the classification code for the dialysis method of the patients classified in the shaded area in the table, i.e., PD + HD patients, was left to the subjective decision of the respondents
HD hemodialysis, HDF hemodiafiltration, PD peritoneal dialysis
^aMain dialysis methods are classified on the basis of the classification codes for dialysis methods that have conventionally been used in the annual survey
^bIn this survey, patients who did not undergo PD despite having a peritoneal catheter for PD (including those who underwent only peritoneal lavage) were tentatively classified as patients who did not undergo PD (i.e., non-PD patients) to analyze the survey data. It is not intended to standardize the above definition
^cIn this survey, both patients who underwent PD only and those who underwent PD and another method were tentatively classified as patients who underwent PD (i.e., PD patients) to analyze the survey data. It is not intended to standardize the above definition

Back to article page

ISSN: 2059-1381

Contact us

Submission enquiries: Access here and click Contact Us
General enquiries: info@biomedcentral.com