Skip to main content

Table 3 Removal rate and removed β2-MG quantity

From: Multipotentials of new asymmetric cellulose triacetate membrane for on-line hemodiafiltration both in postdilution and predilution

Substitution volume (L/session) Predilution Postdilution p (4 groups)
60 84 (72) p 12 (10) 16 (12) p
RR (%)
 TDF-20PV 78.5 ± 5.4 78.5 ± 6.8 0.937 78.8 ± 5.1 79.8 ± 5.1* 0.028 0.974
 GDF-21 77 ± 9.9 74.3 ± 11.6 0.117 78.3 ± 2.9 78.4 ± 5.4 0.897 0.886
 MFX-25U eco 81.7 ± 2.4 82.8 ± 2 0.219 81.5 ± 2.7 83 ± 2.4 0.145 0.625
 FIX-250S eco 80.5 ± 2.2 80.9 ± 3.3 0.587 81 ± 2.4 81.6 ± 3.5 0.538 0.927
 FIX-250U eco 80.2 ± 3.7 80.5 ± 3.9 0.672 80.8 ± 4.1 81.7 ± 3.6 0.233 0.902
RA (mg)
 TDF-20PV 156.6 ± 29.8 168.1 ± 46.5 0.206 165.8 ± 37.7 161.6 ± 33.8 0.661 0.954
 GDF-21 181.3 ± 17.2 137.3 ± 40.8* 0.035 154.8 ± 53.4 178.2 ± 25.7 0.236 0.163
 MFX-25U eco 212.3 ± 29 251.2 ± 99.1 0.321 220.4 ± 42.6 ± 36.4 0.081 0.564
 FIX-250S eco 167.2 ± 18.7 168.8 ± 26.3 0.731 169 ± 24.2 180.6 ± 28.7 0.303 0.772
 FIX-250U eco 226.2 ± 53.1 274.1 ± 89.4 0.053 219.1 ± 21.9 226.5 ± 24.2 0.319 0.304
  1. Comparisons between 60 L and 84 L (72 L) in the predilution and between 12 L (10 L) and 16 L (12 L) in the postdilution were analyzed by the corresponding t test. *P<0.05. And comparison among four treatment conditions for each membrane was analyzed by one-way ANOVA
  2. RR removal rate, RA removal amount