Skip to main content

Table 4 Removal rate and removed α1-MG quantity

From: Multipotentials of new asymmetric cellulose triacetate membrane for on-line hemodiafiltration both in postdilution and predilution

Substitution volume (L/session)

Predilution

Postdilution

p (4 groups)

60

84(72)

p

12(10)

16(12)

p

RR (%)

 TDF-20PV

38.6 ± 8.9

43.4 ± 11

0.083

39.9 ± 9.1

43.8 ± 7.1*

0.027

0.703

 GDF-21

46.1 ± 8.9

44.7 ± 9

0.226

44.9 ± 6.5

50.6 ± 5.4*

0.001

0.518

 MFX-25U eco

37.2 ± 11

40.7 ± 11.9

0.155

46.1 ± 10

54 ± 9.8*

0.001

0.065

 FIX-250S eco

29.2 ± 6.9

27.1 ± 7.4

0.111

33.6 ± 9.3

34.6 ± 6.5

0.673

0.299

 FIX-250U eco

45.3 ± 6.1

46.7 ± 5.2

0.303

52.4 ± 4.4

54.5 ± 4.9*

0.012

60–16 L

RA (mg)

 TDF-20PV

132.4 ± 22

165 ± 50.3

0.061

145.5 ± 34.4

154.8 ± 24.8

0.184

0.432

 GDF-21

226.1 ± 49.4

201.2 ± 40.1*

0.022

213.1 ± 62.6

255.9 ± 58.2

0.095

0.347

 MFX-25U eco

164.6 ± 37.2

185 ± 34.7

0.056

215.4 ± 40.7

244 ± 40.1*

0.02

60–16 L

 FIX-250S eco

131.1 ± 31.8

126.3 ± 37

0.415

155.3 ± 30

153.6 ± 30.6

0.805

0.309

 FIX-250U eco

224 ± 77.1

231.5 ± 62.4

0.415

238.1 ± 43.8

254.9 ± 52.6*

0.036

0.835

  1. Comparisons between 60 L and 84 L (72 L) in the predilution and between 12 L (10 L) and 16 L (12 L) in the postdilution were analyzed by the corresponding t test. *P<0.05. And comparison among four treatment conditions for each membrane was analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer test
  2. RR Removal rate, RA Removal amount