Skip to main content

Table 4 Removal rate and removed α1-MG quantity

From: Multipotentials of new asymmetric cellulose triacetate membrane for on-line hemodiafiltration both in postdilution and predilution

Substitution volume (L/session) Predilution Postdilution p (4 groups)
60 84(72) p 12(10) 16(12) p
RR (%)
 TDF-20PV 38.6 ± 8.9 43.4 ± 11 0.083 39.9 ± 9.1 43.8 ± 7.1* 0.027 0.703
 GDF-21 46.1 ± 8.9 44.7 ± 9 0.226 44.9 ± 6.5 50.6 ± 5.4* 0.001 0.518
 MFX-25U eco 37.2 ± 11 40.7 ± 11.9 0.155 46.1 ± 10 54 ± 9.8* 0.001 0.065
 FIX-250S eco 29.2 ± 6.9 27.1 ± 7.4 0.111 33.6 ± 9.3 34.6 ± 6.5 0.673 0.299
 FIX-250U eco 45.3 ± 6.1 46.7 ± 5.2 0.303 52.4 ± 4.4 54.5 ± 4.9* 0.012 60–16 L
RA (mg)
 TDF-20PV 132.4 ± 22 165 ± 50.3 0.061 145.5 ± 34.4 154.8 ± 24.8 0.184 0.432
 GDF-21 226.1 ± 49.4 201.2 ± 40.1* 0.022 213.1 ± 62.6 255.9 ± 58.2 0.095 0.347
 MFX-25U eco 164.6 ± 37.2 185 ± 34.7 0.056 215.4 ± 40.7 244 ± 40.1* 0.02 60–16 L
 FIX-250S eco 131.1 ± 31.8 126.3 ± 37 0.415 155.3 ± 30 153.6 ± 30.6 0.805 0.309
 FIX-250U eco 224 ± 77.1 231.5 ± 62.4 0.415 238.1 ± 43.8 254.9 ± 52.6* 0.036 0.835
  1. Comparisons between 60 L and 84 L (72 L) in the predilution and between 12 L (10 L) and 16 L (12 L) in the postdilution were analyzed by the corresponding t test. *P<0.05. And comparison among four treatment conditions for each membrane was analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer test
  2. RR Removal rate, RA Removal amount