Skip to main content

Table 2 Prevalent dialysis patient counts, by modality and prefecture, 2018*

From: Annual dialysis data report for 2018, JSDT Renal Data Registry: survey methods, facility data, incidence, prevalence, and mortality

Prefecture

Number of surveyed faciliteis

Number of responded facilities

Hemodialysis

Peritoneal dialysis

Total

Per million of general population**

Hemodialysis

Hemodiafiltration

Hemofiltration

Blood adsorption filtration

Home hemodialysis

PD only

PD + HD 1/week

PD + HD 2/week

PD + HD 3/week

PD + HD other frequencies

Hokkaido

261

257

8940

6524

0

85

9

397

90

3

1

11

16,060

3038.2

Aomori

41

40

1348

2177

0

5

3

69

12

1

0

0

3615

2862.2

Iwate

44

44

2610

432

0

10

0

84

11

0

0

0

3147

2535.9

Miyagi

65

65

3833

1967

0

13

4

96

12

1

1

2

5929

2560.0

Akita

42

42

1402

724

0

2

2

53

3

0

0

0

2186

2228.3

Yamagata

36

35

1666

948

0

5

12

44

8

1

2

0

2686

2464.2

Fukushima

70

68

2568

2,417

0

16

0

71

33

10

4

0

5119

2746.2

Ibaraki

86

86

5777

2,392

0

48

17

68

14

1

0

0

8317

2890.9

Tochigi

78

78

4250

2058

0

22

7

121

18

1

2

1

6480

3329.9

Gunma

63

62

4028

1942

0

0

13

56

18

1

0

0

6058

3103.5

Saitama

196

191

10044

8037

0

60

74

239

76

9

1

1

18,541

2529.5

Chiba

156

154

9365

5817

0

35

13

228

61

5

1

0

15,525

2482.0

Tokyo

442

435

17838

13,422

3

140

95

896

264

16

1

7

32,682

2364.5

Kanagawa

264

264

14113

6818

2

63

31

539

93

2

0

3

21,664

2360.7

Niigata

54

54

3794

1221

1

20

2

161

26

2

1

1

5229

2328.1

Toyama

42

42

1875

589

0

14

3

93

13

0

2

0

2589

2465.7

Ishikawa

41

41

1815

813

0

20

5

59

6

0

0

0

2718

2378.0

Fukui

25

25

1026

710

0

3

3

76

22

5

0

0

1845

2383.7

Yamanashi

33

33

1272

1020

0

6

2

21

14

0

0

0

2335

2858.0

Nagano

73

72

3063

2097

2

12

18

83

18

3

1

0

5297

2567.6

Gifu

72

72

3470

1486

0

22

28

70

19

1

0

0

5096

2551.8

Shizuoka

126

126

5707

5252

1

44

21

104

22

6

0

1

11,158

3049.5

Aichi

193

193

12,223

5728

1

80

46

611

91

2

0

1

18,783

2492.1

Mie

55

52

2849

1015

0

22

8

65

12

1

0

0

3972

2217.8

Shiga

40

39

1682

1370

0

33

35

97

18

0

0

0

3235

2291.1

Kyoto

81

79

3822

2507

0

80

11

138

74

8

0

1

6641

2563.1

Osaka

326

320

12,465

10,851

2

168

47

428

97

5

5

2

24,070

2731.2

Hyogo

201

199

7787

6213

0

122

72

167

26

3

0

0

14,390

2624.0

Nara

50

48

1762

1502

0

30

8

96

30

0

0

1

3429

2560.9

Wakayama

48

47

2299

612

0

11

27

58

8

0

0

0

3015

3224.6

Tottori

26

26

668

812

0

2

4

51

9

1

0

1

1548

2764.3

Shimane

31

31

730

878

0

0

2

53

11

1

1

1

1677

2466.2

Okayama

67

67

2856

2087

0

27

5

180

14

6

0

1

5176

2727.1

Hiroshima

100

98

4128

3074

0

32

28

209

57

36

1

2

7567

2686.2

Yamaguchi

61

58

1760

1730

0

12

1

86

26

2

0

0

3617

2640.1

Tokushima

39

39

1355

1285

0

6

5

124

30

2

1

3

2811

3819.3

Kagawa

48

48

1277

1262

0

12

8

141

49

0

0

1

2750

2858.6

Ehime

54

54

2040

1826

0

16

0

95

34

0

1

9

4021

2974.1

Kochi

39

39

783

1690

0

9

0

18

2

0

0

2

2504

3546.7

Fukuoka

198

194

10,389

3954

1

37

19

691

43

0

1

2

15,137

2964.0

Saga

36

36

1809

739

0

7

1

8

7

0

0

0

2571

3139.2

Nagasaki

63

62

2708

1191

0

11

19

117

11

2

0

1

4060

3027.6

Kumamoto

90

89

4901

1511

0

30

4

130

26

0

0

2

6604

3758.7

Oita

70

68

2958

941

0

9

4

108

32

4

1

0

4057

3546.3

Miyazaki

65

65

2977

901

0

4

0

56

4

0

0

6

3948

3652.2

Kagoshima

95

95

4016

1305

1

22

2

153

30

0

0

6

5535

3429.4

Okinawa

72

70

2374

1946

0

20

2

74

27

1

2

1

4447

3071.1

Total

4,458

4,402

202,422 (59.6)

125,793 (37.0)

14 (0.0)

1,447 (0.4)

720 (0.2)

7,582 (2.2)

1,621 (0.5)

142 (0.0)

30 (0.0)

70 (0.0)

339,841 (100.0)

2687.7

  1. *The above data were obtained from the facility survey.
  2. **The numbers of dialysis patients were adjusted as per million population (pmp) by the annual governement report reference [7]