Skip to main content

Table 10 Evidence profile

From: Peritoneal Dialysis Guidelines 2019 Part 2: Main Text (Position paper of the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy)

Certainty assessment

Effect

Certainty

Importance

No. of studies

Study design

Bias risk

Inconsistency

Indirectness

Inaccuracy

Other

   

Death

 16

Observational studies

Serious

Serious

Not serious

Not serious

None

HD is better: 9 reports

PD is better: 2 reports

Very low

Critical

  1. Notes:
  2. The 17th paper was excluded due to a very high bias risk
  3. Control of confounding factors was not carried out; hence, there is a serious risk for bias
  4. A study that used a database containing data from Korea, Australia, and Taiwan had problems with indirectness in its methodology for both PD and HD
  5. No research on urine volume, residual renal function, or glycemic control outcomes