Skip to main content

Table 4 Evidence profile: SR1.2. Comparison of ACEI with ARB (effect of ARB to ACEI)

From: Peritoneal Dialysis Guidelines 2019 Part 2: Main Text (Position paper of the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy)

Certainty assessment

Number of patients

Effect

Certainty

Importance

No. of studies

Research design

Bias risk

Inconsistency

Indirectness

Inaccuracy

Other

CQ1.2 ARB

ACEI

Relative [95% CI]

Absolute (95% CI)

Overall survival rate (number of deaths due to events)

 1

RCT

Serious a

Not serious

Not serious

Serious b

None

0/30 (0.0%)

0/30 (0.0%)

Cannot estimate

No change per 1000 patients (60 patients decreased to 60 patients increased)

Low

Critical

Technical survival (PD continuation period/PD withdrawal) (PD withdrawal)

 1

RCT

Serious a

Not serious

Not serious

Serious b

None

0/30 (0.0%)

0/30 (0.0%)

Cannot estimate

No change per 1000 patients (60 patients decreased to 60 patients increased)

Low

Critical

Technical survival (PD continuation period/PD withdrawal) (peritonitis)

 1

RCT

Serious a

Not serious

Serious c

Serious b

None

7/30 (23.3%)

6/30 (20.0%)

RR 1.17 [0.44–3.06]

34 patients increased per 1000 patients (112 patients decreased to 412 patients increased)

Very low

Important

Urine volume/residual renal function (urine volume)

 1

RCT

Serious a

Not serious

Not serious

Serious b

None

30

30

-

MD 145 mL increase (8.35 mL decrease to 298.35 mL increase)

Low

Critical

Urine volume/residual renal function (anuria)

 1

RCT

Serious a

Not serious

Not serious

Serious b

None

12/30 (40.0%)

11/30 (36.7%)

RR 1.09 [0.57–2.07]

33 patients increased per 1000 patients (158 patients decreased to 393 patients increased)

Low

Critical

Urine volume/residual renal function (GFR)

 1

RCT

Serious due

Not serious

Not serious

Serious b

None

30

30

-

MD 0.18 decrease (0.4 decrease to 0.04 increase)

Low

Critical

Dialysis volume (total KT/V)

 1

RCT

Serious a

Not serious

Serious c

Serious b

None

42

42

-

MD 0.09 decrease (0.26 decrease to 0.08 increase)

Very low

Important

Complications (including drug adverse effects/safety issues/hospital stay period) (hyperkalemia)

 2

RCT

Serious a

Not serious

Not serious

Serious b

None

6/72 (8.3%)

5/72 (6.9%)

RR 1.20 [0.40–3.63]

14 patients increased per 1000 patients (41 patients decreased to 181 patients increased)

Low

Important

Complications (including drug adverse effects/safety issues/hospital stay period) (hospitalization)

 1

RCT

Serious a

Not serious

Serious c

Serious b

None

4/30 (13.3%)

5/30 (16.7%)

RR 0.80 [0.24–2.69]

33 patients decreased per 1000 patients (127 patients decreased to 282 patients increased)

Very low

Important

Other outcomes deemed important by the CQ team (cardiovascular events)

 1

RCT

Serious a

Not serious

Not serious

Serious b

None

4/30 (13.3%)

3/30 (10.0%)

RR 1.33 [0.33–5.45]

33 patients increased per 1000 patients (67 patients decreased to 445 patients increased)

Low

Critical

  1. CI, confidence interval; RR, risk ratio; MD, mean difference
  2. aMany unclear criteria in the risk of bias table
  3. bThe 95% CI of risk difference crosses the threshold
  4. cSurrogate outcomes
  5. dOnly one study
  6. eThe limited number of patients