Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Inguinal hernia in hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis patients: a case-control study

Renal Replacement Therapy volume 2, Article number: 24 (2016) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Inguinal hernia is common in dialysis patients, especially peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients; however, no previous reports have assessed the incidence, type, treatments, and risk factors of inguinal hernia in hemodialysis (HD) patients. We retrospectively evaluated the differences in these factors between HD and PD patients.

Methods

A total of 2287 HD and 410 PD patients treated between March 2006 and December 2013 were enrolled. The incidence, type (indirect, direct, or combined), and hernioplasty of inguinal hernia as well as demographic characteristics of HD and PD patients were compared.

Results

The incidence of inguinal hernia was lower in HD (0.7 %) than in PD patients (5.9 %) (P < 0.001), and these incidences were higher among men (P = 0.007 and P < 0.001, respectively). Of the 16 HD and 24 PD patients with inguinal hernia, 14 and 21 (both 88 %) underwent hernioplasty. Among them, PD patients demonstrated a higher proportion of indirect hernia (91 %) than HD (47 %) patients (P = 0.003). No recurrence was observed in either group. In a multivariate logistic regression model, PD and male sex were risk factors for inguinal hernia (both P < 0.001).

Conclusions

In this study, indirect inguinal hernia was more frequent in PD patients than in HD patients. Male sex and PD are risk factors for inguinal hernia in dialysis patients. Tension-free hernioplasty for inguinal hernia was effective in both HD and PD patients. Our findings can help inform clinicians when selecting the dialysis modality (HD or PD) prior to the initiation of dialysis therapy and guide clinical management practices for inguinal hernias in dialysis patients.

Background

Inguinal hernia, which accounts for 75 % of abdominal wall hernias [1], is common in dialysis patients as well as healthy individuals and is caused by abdominal wall fragility [2] and increased intra-abdominal pressure [3]. Aging, male sex, chronic cough [4], prolonged peritoneal dialysis (PD) vintage [5], and polycystic kidney disease [6] have been reported as risk factors of abdominal wall hernia formation. By contrast, being overweight has been reported to reduce the risk of inguinal hernia [4, 7, 8]. However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous reports have focused on the incidence, type (direct, indirect, or combined), and risk factors of inguinal hernia in hemodialysis (HD) patients.

In this study, we compared the incidence, type, surgical treatments, and risk factors of inguinal hernia between HD and PD patients.

Methods

Patient identification

This study was a retrospective analysis of records from Tsuchiya General Hospital collected between March 2006 and December 2013. The management and surgical techniques for dialysis patients with inguinal hernia were established in March 2006. The study was approved by the Tsuchiya General Hospital Institutional Review Board for Human Investigation and performed according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent for the procedure was obtained from all patients, and patient anonymity was strictly maintained. We identified HD and PD patients who developed inguinal hernia. Patients with a history of abdominal hernia prior to HD or PD therapy were excluded. Eligible patients were divided into 4 groups, excluding umbilical hernia patients: HD hernia, PD hernia, HD no-hernia, and PD no-hernia. Clinical manifestations were recorded for each patient after a medical chart review. Data were collected at the initiation of HD or PD therapy or the onset of hernia and included demographic characteristics such as age, sex, body mass index (BMI), primary renal disease, history of asthma, and previous abdominal surgery as well as whether hernia was unilateral or bilateral. Data concerning daily peritoneal dialysate volume and the proportion of automated PD (APD) during the study period were also collected.

Methods and techniques for hernioplasty

A single surgeon with 15 years of experience performed all hernioplasties. Under general anesthesia, a Kugel repair (tension-free hernioplasty) was performed using a Kugel or Polysoft Hernia Patch (polypropylene mesh) (Davol, Cranston, RI, USA) [9]. The type of inguinal hernia (direct, indirect, or combined) was identified at hernioplasty. During hernioplasty, great care was taken not to open the peritoneum to avoid dialysate leakage.

Clinical outcomes

We reviewed post-procedural complications including wound bleeding, infection, hernia recurrence, and postoperative 90-day survival in HD and PD patients and reviewed peritonitis, dialysate leakage, PD dysfunction, PD withdrawal, and PD vintage after hernioplasty in PD patients.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 14 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and expressed as the number of participants and percentage of the study population or as means and ranges. To analyze factors associated with the development of hernias, Student’s t test and chi-square test were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for the development of hernia. Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient characteristics

At our hospital, 2287 HD patients (1401 men (P = 0.31); mean age, 65; range, 18–99 years at the initiation of HD therapy) and 410 PD patients (257 men; mean age, 61; range, 24–98 years (P < 0.001) at the initiation of PD therapy) were treated during the study period. Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The primary renal diseases in the HD and PD patients were diabetes mellitus (N = 937 and 121, respectively), chronic glomerulonephritis (N = 605 and 206), nephrosclerosis (N = 204 and 17), polycystic kidney disease (N = 58 and 7), immunoglobulin A nephropathy (N = 46 and 9), others (N = 185 and 11), and unknown (N = 252 and 39). The rate of diabetes mellitus diagnoses was significantly higher in the HD group (P < 0.001). Among the HD and PD patients, 16 (0.7 %) and 24 (5.9 %) developed inguinal hernia, respectively (P < 0.001).

Table 1 Patient characteristics and incidence of inguinal hernia by dialysis status
Full size table

In these 16 HD and 24 PD hernia patients, the primary renal diseases were diabetes mellitus (N = 4 and 15, respectively), chronic glomerulonephritis (N = 5 and 7), nephrosclerosis (N = 4 and 1), polycystic kidney disease (N = 1; PD group), renal hypoplasia (N = 1; HD group), and unknown (N = 2; HD group). At the onset of hernia, the mean ages of the HD and PD patients were 66 (22–91) and 66 (42–82) years, respectively (P = 0.9). Fifteen HD and 21 PD patients had unilateral hernia, and 1 HD and 3 PD patients had bilateral hernias, respectively (P = 0.5). The mean duration from initiation of dialysis therapy to onset of hernia in the HD patients (64 (range, 5–148) months) was significantly longer than that in the PD patients (24 (1–101) months; P = 0.004). There were significantly higher proportions of men in both the HD and PD hernia groups (100 % (P < 0.001) and 88 % (P = 0.007)) compared to the no-hernia groups (61 and 62 %, respectively). The mean BMI of patients at the onset of hernia (23.4 (19.1–33.0) kg/m2) was similar to that during the initiation of PD therapy (23.1 (18.4–32.2) kg/m2; P = 0.58), while the mean BMI of patients at the onset of hernia (19.9 (18.3–21.4) kg/m2) was significantly lower than that during the initiation of HD therapy (20.7 (19.6–22.6) kg/m2; P < 0.001). The mean BMI of the HD hernia group was lower than that of the PD hernia group at both dialysis initiation (P = 0.03) and hernia onset (P = 0.004) (Table 2).

Table 2 Patient characteristics with incident inguinal hernia by dialysis status
Full size table

The rates of asthma in both the HD and PD hernia groups (13 % (N = 2; P = 0.9) and 13 % (N = 3; P = 0.5)) were similar to those in the no-hernia groups (11 % (N = 252) and 19 % (N = 71), respectively). The proportion of previous surgery in the PD hernia group (30 % (N = 7)) was similar to that in the PD no-hernia group (25 % (N = 93; P = 0.46)), while the proportion of previous abdominal surgery in the HD hernia group (31 % (N = 5)) was significantly higher than that in the HD no-hernia group (12 % (N = 265; P = 0.04)).

In the PD patients, the mean daily dialysate volume was 5.3 (range, 1.0–15.5) L/day; 16 % of patients underwent APD. The mean daily dialysate volumes in the PD hernia and PD no-hernia groups were 4.8 (range, 3.0–7.5) and 5.4 (1.0–15.5) L/day, respectively (P = 0.12). The rates of APD before the onset of hernias in the PD hernia and PD no-hernia groups were 9 and 17 %, respectively (P = 0.25).

In logistic regression analyses, PD (odds ratio (OR), 9.8; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 5.1–19.4; P < 0.001) and male sex (OR, 7.8; 95 % CI, 2.8–32.7; P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for the development of inguinal hernia. The other variables were not determinants (Table 3).

Table 3 Risk factors for inguinal hernia development in dialysis patients
Full size table

Hernioplasty

Hernioplasty data are summarized in Table 4. Of the 16 HD and 24 PD patients with inguinal hernia, 14 and 21 (both 88 %) underwent a Kugel repair. The total of 22 hernias in the 21 PD patients included 20 (91 %) indirect, 1 direct, and 1 combined hernia, while the total of 15 hernias in the 14 HD patients included 7 (47 %) indirect, 6 direct, and 2 combined hernias. The incidence of indirect hernias was significantly higher in the PD group (P = 0.003). The median duration from the onset of inguinal hernia to hernioplasty in the HD and PD patients was 30 (range, 0.7–261) and 8 (0.2–75) months, respectively.

Table 4 Hernioplasty for dialysis patients with inguinal hernia and clinical outcomes
Full size table

Clinical outcomes

No recurrence was observed in either the HD or PD groups. In 2 patients, PD therapy was discontinued due to complications within 90 days of hernioplasty: 1 case of peritonitis and 1 of lower abdominal discomfort. In 1 patient, PD therapy was withdrawn due to peritonitis prior to hernioplasty. The mean PD vintage after hernioplasty was 28 (range, 1–62) months. The overall postoperative 90-day survival rate was 100 % in both groups (Table 4).

Discussion

PD patients tend to have a higher incidence of inguinal hernias compared with healthy individuals. The reported incidence of abdominal wall hernias ranges from 2.5 to 25 % in PD patients [10, 11]. Therefore, the incidence of inguinal hernia in PD patients in our study was consistent with previous reports. By contrast, no previous reports have investigated the incidence of inguinal hernia in HD patients. Moreover, to the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have investigated the incidence of inguinal hernia in healthy Japanese adults, although the hernia is common in healthy individuals. On the other hand, a previous study reported that the incidences of groin hernias in Nepalese (South Asian) men and women were 1.5 and 0.6 %, respectively [12]. In our study, the incidence in HD patients (0.7 %) is similar to that in healthy Western adults and Nepalese, in whom the reported incidence is 1–2 % [12–14].

Inguinal hernias are classified anatomically as indirect or direct. In the analysis of the Swedish Hernia Register, indirect inguinal hernia accounted for 54 % of groin hernias repaired in men [15]. In our study, there was a higher proportion of indirect hernia in the PD (91 %) than in the HD (47 %) patients treated with hernioplasty. Indirect inguinal hernias in adults are almost always congenital. A shutter mechanism, which is postulated to close the internal inguinal ring to a slit, may be dysfunctional in patients with a patent processus vaginalis [16, 17]. Our findings suggest that indirect inguinal hernia may not be clinically apparent due to the presence of a small internal ring (i.e., slit) before the initiation of PD therapy and may become clinically detectable as a result of internal ring expansion due to the increase in intra-abdominal pressure from peritoneal dialysate. On the other hand, there is no slit within Hesselbach’s triangle, where a direct hernia can occur. Therefore, direct inguinal hernia may be susceptible to intra-abdominal pressure from peritoneal dialysate.

In a previous report, low body weight was associated with abdominal hernia formation in PD patients [18]. In another report, BMI was not a risk factor for hernia development in PD patients [6]. Among adults in the USA, overweight and obesity were associated with a lower incidence of inguinal hernia [4]. No previous reports have focused on risk factors of inguinal hernia in HD patients. In our study, the BMIs of HD patients were lower than those of PD patients at both dialysis initiation and hernia onset, and decreased BMI (i.e., body weight) may be a risk factor for inguinal hernia formation only in HD patients. Our findings in HD patients are similar to those previously reported in healthy individuals [4]. In HD patients, lean or malnourished patients, who have less abdominal muscle and loose connective tissues around the inguinal region, may be associated with the development of inguinal hernia. On the other hand, in PD patients, factors associated with PD may counteract other factors including BMI for the development of inguinal hernia.

Strong associations of abdominal hernias with aging, male sex, chronic cough [4], polycystic kidney disease [19], and PD vintage [5] have been reported. In our study, PD and male sex were risk factors for the development of inguinal hernia. By contrast, aging, asthma, polycystic kidney disease, and previous abdominal surgery were not independent risk factors for the development of inguinal hernia. The reasons for these findings may include aging of the patients undergoing dialysis or the small sample size of patients with PD in our study.

Tension-free hernioplasty with mesh is preferred for the treatment of inguinal hernia because of its association with low hernia recurrence rates [20, 21] and has also been recommended for PD patients [22]. In our study, tension-free hernioplasty was performed in both HD and PD patients with inguinal hernia, and no recurrence was observed. Our findings suggest that tension-free hernioplasty is an effective treatment for inguinal hernia in both HD and PD patients. Although the meshes used for hernioplasty were not associated with peritonitis [23, 24], great care should be taken not to open the peritoneum during hernioplasty to avoid peritonitis, since the meshes are a foreign body.

This study has several limitations. First, it was based on a group of patients treated at a single center. Second, the sample size was small. However, our study is valuable in that no previous reports have assessed the incidences, type, surgical treatment, and risk factors of inguinal hernias in both HD and PD patients.

Conclusions

Indirect inguinal hernia was more frequent in PD patients compared with HD patients. Male sex and PD were risk factors of inguinal hernia in dialysis patients. Tension-free hernioplasty for inguinal hernia was effective in both HD and PD patients. Our findings can help inform clinicians when selecting the dialysis modality (HD or PD) prior to the initiation of dialysis therapy and guide clinical management practices for inguinal hernias in dialysis patients.

References

  1. Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K. Hernias: inguinal and incisional. Lancet. 2003;362:1561–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Colin JF, Elliot P, Ellis H. The effect of uraemia upon wound healing: an experimental study. Br J Surg. 1979;66:793–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hendry PO, Paterson-Brown S, de Beaux A. Work related aspects of inguinal hernia: a literature review. Surgeon. 2008;6:361–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ruhl CE, Everhart JE. Risk factors for inguinal hernia among adults in the US population. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;165:1154–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang SF, Liu CJ, Yang WC, Chang CF, Yang CY, Li SY, et al. The risk factors and the impact of hernia development on technique survival in peritoneal dialysis patients: a population-based cohort study. Perit Dial Int. 2015;35:351–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Del Peso G, Bajo MA, Costero O, Hevia C, Gil F, Diaz C, et al. Risk factors for abdominal wall complications in peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int. 2003;23:249–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Abramson JH, Gofin J, Hopp C, Makler A, Epstein LM. The epidemiology of inguinal hernia. A survey in western Jerusalem. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1978;32:59–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Liem MS, van der Graaf Y, Zwart RC, Geurts I, van Vroonhoven TJ. Risk factors for inguinal hernia in women: a case-control study. The Coala Trial Group. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;146:721–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kugel RD. Minimally invasive, nonlaparoscopic, preperitoneal, and sutureless, inguinal herniorrhaphy. Am J Surg. 1999;178:298–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nelson H, Lindner M, Schuman ES, Gross GF, Hayes JF. Abdominal wall hernias as a complication of peritoneal dialysis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1983;157:541–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. O'Connor JP, Rigby RJ, Hardie IR, Wall DR, Strong RW, Woodruff PW, et al. Abdominal hernias complicating continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Am J Nephrol. 1986;6:271–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stewart BT, Pathak J, Gupta S, Shrestha S, Groen RS, Nwomeh BC, et al. An estimate of hernia prevalence in Nepal from a countrywide community survey. Int J Surg. 2015;13:111–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Holzheimer RG, Schreiber A. Inguinal hernia and concomitant varicocele mimicking mesh complication. Eur J Med Res. 2003;8:254–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jenkins JT, O'Dwyer PJ. Inguinal hernias. BMJ. 2008;336:269–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Koch A, Edwards A, Haapaniemi S, Nordin P, Kald A. Prospective evaluation of 6895 groin hernia repairs in women. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1553–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dubbs W, MacLeod WA, O'Connell TX. Restoration of the shutter mechanism in inguinal herniorrhaphy. Am J Surg. 1980;139:461–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Read RC. British contributions to modern herniology of the groin. Hernia. 2005;9:6–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Twardowski ZJ, Khanna R, Nolph KD, Scalamogna A, Metzler MH, Schneider TW, et al. Intraabdominal pressures during natural activities in patients treated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Nephron. 1986;44:129–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Balda S, Power A, Papalois V, Brown E. Impact of hernias on peritoneal dialysis technique survival and residual renal function. Perit Dial Int. 2013;33:629–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Collaboration EUHT. Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg. 2002;235:322–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bisgaard T, Bay-Nielsen M, Christensen IJ, Kehlet H. Risk of recurrence 5 years or more after primary Lichtenstein mesh and sutured inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1038–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lewis DM, Bingham C, Beaman M, Nicholls AJ, Riad HN. Polypropylene mesh hernia repair—an alternative permitting rapid return to peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998;13:2488–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Afthentopoulos IE, Panduranga Rao S, Mathews R, Oreopoulos DG. Hernia development in CAPD patients and the effect of 2.5 l dialysate volume in selected patients. Clin Nephrol. 1998;49:251–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Garcia-Urena MA, Rodriguez CR, Vega Ruiz V, Carnero Hernandez FJ, Fernandez-Ruiz E, Vazquez Gallego JM, et al. Prevalence and management of hernias in peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int. 2006;26:198–202.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to the dialysis staff who provided data in Tsuchiya General Hospital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Artificial Organs, Akane-Foundation, Tsuchiya General Hospital, 3-30, Nakajimacho, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8655, Japan

    Masataka Banshodani, Hideki Kawanishi, Misaki Moriishi, Sadanori Shintaku & Shinji Hashimoto

  2. Faculty of Medicine, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan

    Hideki Kawanishi

  3. Department of Surgery, Akane-Foundation, Tsuchiya General Hospital, 3-30, Nakajimacho, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8655, Japan

    Masahiro Nishihara

Authors
  1. Masataka Banshodani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hideki Kawanishi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Misaki Moriishi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sadanori Shintaku
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shinji Hashimoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Masahiro Nishihara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masataka Banshodani.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

MB designed the study, performed the retrospective analysis and interpretation of the data obtained from our institution, and wrote the article. HK designed the study and performed the interpretation of the data. MM, SS, SH, and MN provided the intellectual content of the critical importance to the work described. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Banshodani, M., Kawanishi, H., Moriishi, M. et al. Inguinal hernia in hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis patients: a case-control study. Ren Replace Ther 2, 24 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41100-016-0035-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41100-016-0035-1

Keywords

  • Hemodialysis
  • Hernioplasty
  • Inguinal hernia
  • Peritoneal dialysis

Renal Replacement Therapy

ISSN: 2059-1381

Contact us