From: Which clinical conditions are most suitable for induction of automated peritoneal dialysis?
Study (published year) | Study design | Setting countries | Data source | N (CAPD,APD) | Duration of observation | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bro S et al. (1999) [16] | Randomized controlled study | Denmark (1995–1999) | Multicenter | 34 (17, 17) | 6 months | APD was better for QoL but more problem for sleep disturbance |
de Wit GA et al. (2001) [67] | Cross-sectional study | Netherlands (1993–2001) | Multicenter, (NECOSAD) | 96 (59, 37) | N/A | APD was better |
Sunder S et al. (2008) [68] | Prospective observational study | India (N/A) | Single center | 18 | 12Â months | Ns. |
Guney I et al. (2010) [65] | Cross-sectional study | Turkey (N/A) | Single center | 68 (48, 20) | N/A | Ns. |
Balasubramanian G et al. (2011) [11] | Retrospective observational study | UK (2003–2008) | Single center | 224 (111, 131) | 5 years | Ns. |
Michels WM et al. (2011) [101] | Prospective cohort study | Netherlands (1997–2006) | Multicenter (NECOSAD) | 550 (486, 64) | 3 months–3 years | Ns. |
Losso RL et al. (2015) [110] | Observational cross-sectional study | Curitiba, Parana, Brazil (N/A) | Multicenter | 76 (48, 28) | N/A | Ns. |