Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison between APD and CAPD for health-related quality of life and sleep

From: Which clinical conditions are most suitable for induction of automated peritoneal dialysis?

Study (published year)

Study design

Setting countries

Data source

N (CAPD,APD)

Duration of observation

Results

Bro S et al. (1999) [16]

Randomized controlled study

Denmark (1995–1999)

Multicenter

34 (17, 17)

6 months

APD was better for QoL but more problem for sleep disturbance

de Wit GA et al. (2001) [67]

Cross-sectional study

Netherlands (1993–2001)

Multicenter, (NECOSAD)

96 (59, 37)

N/A

APD was better

Sunder S et al. (2008) [68]

Prospective observational study

India (N/A)

Single center

18

12 months

Ns.

Guney I et al. (2010) [65]

Cross-sectional study

Turkey (N/A)

Single center

68 (48, 20)

N/A

Ns.

Balasubramanian G et al. (2011) [11]

Retrospective observational study

UK (2003–2008)

Single center

224 (111, 131)

5 years

Ns.

Michels WM et al. (2011) [101]

Prospective cohort study

Netherlands (1997–2006)

Multicenter (NECOSAD)

550 (486, 64)

3 months–3 years

Ns.

Losso RL et al. (2015) [110]

Observational cross-sectional study

Curitiba, Parana, Brazil (N/A)

Multicenter

76 (48, 28)

N/A

Ns.

  1. Ref. Bieber SD et al. [7]
  2. Ns. not significant differences between CAPD and CAD, N/A not available in the text, NECOSAD Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis