- Open Access
Impact of hypokalemia on peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients: a systematic review
© The Author(s) 2017
- Received: 12 April 2017
- Accepted: 22 August 2017
- Published: 23 November 2017
Hypokalemia is a common electrolyte disorder in peritoneal dialysis patients. Some studies showed the association of serum potassium levels with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and infection. This review aims to clarify the relationship of hypokalemia and peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis.
The MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles published from 1990 to May 2016. The following search terms were used: hypokal(a)emia, potassium, peritoneal dialysis, peritonitis, and infection. Additional studies were identified by hand searching through references and using the MEDLINE-related articles option. Two investigators independently selected studies using predefined criteria and assessed each study’s quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale.
A total of 159 abstracts were identified and 6 trials were included in the systematic review (n = 3613). One national prospective study and two retrospective single-center studies indicated that hypokalemia increases the risk of peritonitis, whether two single-center studies indicated otherwise. One case-control study indicated that lower potassium level was associated with a poor therapeutic outcome in peritonitis.
Convincing clinical trial data are unavailable to show the association of hypokalemia with peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients, and we need to clarify whether the therapeutic intervention to normalize serum potassium levels decreases the risk of peritonitis and infection-related mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients.
- Peritoneal dialysis
Peritonitis is one of the specific and major complications in peritoneal dialysis, which does not occur in hemodialysis. It is well known that peritonitis is the major reason for withdrawal of peritoneal dialysis [1, 2]. Candidates for renal replacement therapy often hesitate to select peritoneal dialysis due to fear of the possibility of peritonitis.
For reducing the risk of peritonitis, various strategies are indicated in position statement of the international society for peritoneal dialysis, such as prophylactic antibiotics at catheter insertion and before invasive gastrointestinal procedures, patient training program, and avoidance of constipation . In spite of those efforts of prevention of peritonitis, peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis rates have not been reduced sufficiently [1, 4]. Even the introduction of disconnect systems has not been dramatically improved the risk of peritonitis [5, 6].
How can we reduce the risk of peritonitis more? Although strong evidence does not exist yet, hypoalbuminemia, vitamin D insufficiency, depression, and hypokalemia are reported as the residual modifiable risk factors for peritonitis [3, 7]. Hypokalemia is common, but insufficiently studied, electrolyte disorder that occurs in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis. This review aims to clarify the relationship between hypokalemia and peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis.
The review protocol has been registered in PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42016039950).
Search strategy and selection criteria
The MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles published from 1990 to May 2016. The following search terms were used: hypokal(a)emia, potassium, peritoneal dialysis, peritonitis, and infection. Additional studies were identified by manually searching through references and using the “related articles” option in MEDLINE. Eligible studies or studies in which eligibility criteria were unclear after the title and abstract screening underwent full-text review. A study that met the following criteria was included: (1) the study compared the clinical outcomes of peritoneal dialysis patients with or without hypokalemia and (2) the study reported the incidence of peritonitis. Two reviewers (K.N. and K.S.) assessed the criteria for all studies identified for full-text review.
Data extraction and quality assessment
We extracted characteristics of the study populations (sample size, age, sex, prevalence of diabetes mellitus, and other clinical information), characteristics of the studies (study design, source of cohort, and follow-up periods), and outcome characteristics. According to the Newcastle-Ottawa scale [8, 9], the quality of the included studies was scored independently by two investigators (K.N. and K.S.), with disagreements resolved by consensus. The systematic review of the literature was performed according to PRISMA guidelines .
Details of cohort studies included in this analysis
Study and year (reference)
Peritonitis rate (patient-month per episode)
Ribeiro, 2015 
Fan, 2014 
Liawnoraset, 2011 
Su, 2012 
Chuang, 2009 
Risk-of-bias and quality assessment
Risk of bias in included cohort studies
Study and year (reference)
Selection of controls
Not present at outset
Duration of follow-up
Adequacy of follow-up
Ribeiro, 2015 
Fan, 2014 
Liawnoraset, 2011 
Su, 2012 
Chuang, 2009 
Trial characteristics and outcome
Several mechanisms can be speculated for hypokalemia to promote peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis (Fig. 3). At first, hypokalemia may induce gastrointestinal dysmotility  and intestinal bacterial overgrowth . As a result, the translocation of bacteria from the intestine to peritoneal cavity may cause peritonitis. Moreover, potassium chloride supplementation decreased pain intensity and erythrocyte sediment rate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis  and may have the protective effect on inflammatory response .
Our review could not find a consistent correlation between hypokalemia and peritonitis in patients with peritoneal dialysis. We did not identify sufficient data and studies with low-risk bias to clarify the association. To confirm the causal connection, further well-designed studies are needed whether the adjustment of potassium levels can improve the risk of peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients with hypokalemia.
The authors wish to acknowledge contributions to this work from Daisuke Kanai and Atsushi Shirai for secure data collection and helpful discussion. This work was partly presented at the ASN Kidney Week 2016 Annual Meeting, November 15-20 in Chicago, IL.
Availability of data and materials
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
KN contributed to the research idea and study design. KN and KS contributed to the data acquisition and data analysis/interpretation. HF and SN contributed to the supervision or mentorship. Each author contributed important intellectual content during manuscript drafting or revision and accepts accountability for the overall work by ensuring that questions pertaining to the accuracy or integrity of any portion of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All authors approved the final version of the submitted manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Mizuno M, Ito Y, Suzuki Y, et al. Recent analysis of status and outcomes of peritoneal dialysis in the Tokai area of Japan: the second report of the Tokai peritoneal dialysis registry. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2016;20(6):960–71. doi:10.1007/s10157-016-1249-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Verger C, Ryckelynck J-P, Duman M, et al. French peritoneal dialysis registry (RDPLF): outline and main results. Kidney Int Suppl. 2006;70(103):S12–20. doi:10.1038/sj.ki.5001911.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Piraino B, Bernardini J, Brown E, et al. ISPD position statement on reducing the risks of peritoneal dialysis-related infections. Perit Dial Int. 2011;31(6):614–30. doi:10.3747/pdi.2011.00057.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brown MC, Simpson K, Kerssens JJ, Mactier RA. Peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis rates and outcomes in a national cohort are not improving in the post-millennium (2000–2007). Perit Dial Int. 2011;31(6):639–50. doi:10.3747/pdi.2010.00185.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Strippoli GFM, Tong A, Johnson D, Schena FP, Craig JC. Catheter-related interventions to prevent peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15(10):2735–46. doi:10.1097/01.ASN.0000141463.95561.79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Piraino B, Sheth H. Peritonitis—does peritoneal dialysis modality make a difference? Blood Purif. 2010;29(2):145–9. doi:10.1159/000245641.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Piraino B. Insights on peritoneal dialysis-related infections. Contrib Nephrol. 2009;163:161–8. doi:10.1159/000223795.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connel D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed 2 Jan 2017.
- Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(9):603–5. doi:10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liberati A, Altman DGDDG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Murata GH, Fox L, Tzamaloukas AH. Predicting the course of peritonitis in patients receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153(20):2317–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ribeiro SC, Figueiredo AE, Barretti P, Pecoits-Filho R, de Moraes TP. Low serum potassium levels increase the infectious-caused mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients: a propensity-matched score study. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0127453. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127453. Aguilera AI, edView ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Su CY, Pei J, Lu XH, Tang W, Wang T. Gastrointestinal symptoms predict peritonitis rates in CAPD patients. Clin Nephrol. 2012;77(4):267–74. doi:10.5414/CN107249.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chuang YW, Shu KH, Yu TM, Cheng CH, Chen CH. Hypokalaemia: an independent risk factor of enterobacteriaceae peritonitis in CAPD patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24(5):1603–8. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn709.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liawnoraset W. Prevalence and factors affecting peritonitis in CAPD patients in Maharat Nakhon Ratchasima Hospital under universal coverage scheme during 2008–2010: a three-year experience. J Med Assoc Thail. 2011;94(Suppl 4):S19–24.Google Scholar
- Fan X, Huang R, Wang J, et al. Risk factors for the first episode of peritonitis in Southern Chinese continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e107485. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0107485. Jia Z, edView ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Yongsiri S, Thammakumpee J, Prongnamchai S, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of spironolactone for hypokalemia in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. Ther Apher Dial. 2015;19(1):81–6. doi:10.1111/1744-9987.12219.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Spital A, Sterns RH. Potassium supplementation via the dialysate in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 1985;6(3):173–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taheri S, Mortazavi M, Pourmoghadas A, Seyrafian S, Alipour Z, Karimi S. A prospective double-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of spironolactone in patients with advanced congestive heart failure on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transplant. 2012;23(3):507–12.Google Scholar
- Ito Y, Mizuno M, Suzuki Y, et al. Long-term effects of spironolactone in peritoneal dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25(5):1094–102. doi:10.1681/ASN.2013030273.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yi J-H, Park J-I, Choi H-Y, Lee H-Y, Han S-W, Kim H-J. Icodextrin improves the serum potassium profile with the enhancement of nutritional status in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. Electrolyte Blood Press. 2009;7(2):79–86. doi:10.5049/EBP.2009.7.2.79.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ekundayo OJ, Adamopoulos C, Ahmed MI, et al. Oral potassium supplement use and outcomes in chronic heart failure: a propensity-matched study. Int J Cardiol. 2010;141(2):167–74. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.11.195.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Singharetnam W, Holley JL. Acute treatment of constipation may lead to transmural migration of bacteria resulting in gram-negative, polymicrobial, or fungal peritonitis. Perit Dial Int. 1996;16(4):423–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shu K-H, Chang C-S, Chuang Y-W, et al. Intestinal bacterial overgrowth in CAPD patients with hypokalaemia. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24(4):1289–92. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfn617.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rastmanesh R, Abargouei AS, Shadman Z, Ebrahimi AA, Weber CE. A pilot study of potassium supplementation in the treatment of hypokalemic patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. J Pain. 2008;9(8):722–31. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2008.03.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wen W, Wan Z, Ren K, et al. Potassium supplementation inhibits IL-17A production induced by salt loading in human T lymphocytes via p38/MAPK-SGK1 pathway. Exp Mol Pathol. 2016;100(3):370–7. doi:10.1016/j.yexmp.2016.03.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar