Methotrexate-induced acute kidney injury in patients with hematological malignancies: three case reports with literature review

Abstract

Background

High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) therapy has been used to treat a wide range of oncological malignancies. While the therapy can be tolerated with hydration, urine pH control, and leucovorin rescue therapy, HD-MTX is cytotoxic and can cause renal failure. There have been several case reports of HD-MTX toxicity in patients with solid tumors; however, few case series of hematological malignancies have been published. Patients with hematological malignancies tend to be administered many concomitant drugs, which can affect the elimination of MTX and result in acute kidney injury.

Case presentation

Here, we present three cases of HD-MTX-induced acute kidney injury in patients with hematological malignancies. Several blood purification methods were used to attempt to eliminate MTX.

Conclusions

Rapid elimination of MTX is needed for patients with higher serum MTX concentrations to avoid additional cytotoxic effects, especially in patients who have experienced many complications. Although the most effective method for MTX elimination remains unknown, the results of our retrospective survey suggest that combined modalities, such as hemodialysis and plasma exchange, may be suitable for treatment of patients with hematological malignancies.

Background

High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX), defined as a dose higher than 500 mg/m² [1] or 1000 mg/m² [2], is used for adult and pediatric patients with a wide range of malignancies, including lymphoma and sarcoma [1, 3]. Alkalization of urine and high-dose leucovorin rescue therapy aid in the safe delivery of HD-MTX therapy, and the adverse effects of HD-MTX in established regimens were thought to be tolerated [4].

There have been many cases reports or case series of MTX toxicity which needed blood purifications in solid tumors, such as osteosarcoma [5,6,7,8,9,10,11], and investigated the incidence of nephrotoxicity by a large-scale retrospective survey [2]. In contrast, similar cases of toxicity in hematologic malignancies are relatively rare [6, 10,11,12,13,14]. The doses of MTX in patients with hematological malignancies are generally lower than those administered to patients with solid cancers [12], and cell toxicity is induced by MTX in a dose-dependent manner [15]; accordingly, the occurrence of MTX toxicity in hematological malignancies appears to be lower than that in solid tumors.

We report here three cases of acute kidney injury (AKI) resulting from MTX toxicity in patients with hematological malignancies. In these cases, we attempted to decrease the serum MTX concentration by using several blood purification methods.

Case presentation

Case 1

A 48-year-old man (body surface area 1.77 m²) was diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia 3 months before the administration of HD-MTX. He received a chemotherapy regimen consisting of cyclophosphamide at 1200 mg/m², vincristine (VCR) at 1.5 mg/m², daunorubicin at 45 mg/m², prednisone at 60 mg/m², and cytarabine (Ara-C) at 40 mg. The patient achieved and maintained complete remission (CR). He was prescribed no trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole combinations or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Lansoprazole, a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), was prescribed at the time of HD-MTX therapy, but the PPI was soon replaced by a histamine receptor blocker (H2 blocker). The first course of intensification chemotherapy, which did not include HD-MTX, consisted of Ara-C at 2 g/m², etoposide at 100 mg/m², dexamethasone at 40 mg/whole body, and L-asparaginase (ASP) at 10,000 KU/m² and commenced 1 month prior to the HD-MTX therapy. During the first course of therapy, grade 2 leukopenia (< 1500/mm³) and sepsis occurred. Cefepime was administered as a 1 g intravenous injection four times daily for 10 days to treat the sepsis. The patient was discharged from our hospital without renal dysfunction. At that point, no urinary abnormalities, such as proteinuria or hematuria, had been observed. One week later, the patient was readmitted to our hospital to receive the second course of intensification therapy. This regimen consisted of MTX at 3 g/m² (over 24 h), VCR at 1.3 mg/m², 6-mercaptopurine at 25 mg/m², L-ASP at 10,000 KU/m², and Ara-C at 40 mg. The patient’s urine pH remained above 7.0 throughout the course of therapy. On day 2, he developed a fever, and treatment with an injection of 1 g cefepime four times daily was initiated. The patient’s serum MTX concentration increased to 33.2 nmol/mL, and serum creatinine rose to 7.63 mg/dL on day 2, although the serum creatinine level was 0.77 mg/dL on day 0 and urinary volume was 2070 mL on day 1. He also suffered from diarrhea, another complication of HD-MTX, for several days. On day 2, the patient’s blood test results were as follows: creatine phosphokinase (CPK), 100 IU/L; blood urea nitrogen (BUN), 62 mg/dL (BUN/Cr ratio was 8.13); uric acid, 6.4 mg/dL; aspartate aminotransferase (AST), 19 IU/L; and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), 7 IU/L. These test results suggested that other etiologies for AKI, such as rhabdomyolysis, hyperuricemia, and liver failure could be excluded and MTX toxicity was the main etiology of AKI despite the patient’s dehydration. In addition to augmentation of the dose of leucovorin, we initiated plasma exchange therapy, which involved replacing the patient’s plasma with fresh frozen plasma (FFP), along with hemodialysis. Plasma exchange was performed eight times, and hemodialysis was performed four times. On day 10, the patient’s plasma MTX concentration was below 1.0 nmol/mL; leucovorin rescue was continued to day 20, and the patient was discharged from our hospital on day 34. His final serum MTX was 0.05 nmol/mL (day 22) and his creatinine was 1.39 mg/dL (day 28). The clinical course is illustrated in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Clinical course of case 1. Cr serum creatinine and MTX serum concentration of methotrexate

Case 2

A 19-year-old man (body surface area 1.36 m²) was diagnosed with mixed-phenotype acute leukemia and received chemotherapy 2 years prior to HD-MTX therapy. He attained CR but relapsed 1 year later and received chemotherapy again at that time. The induction and intensification therapy were performed with the same regimen administered to the patient in case 1. During the first course of intensification therapy, which did not include HD-MTX, he developed a fever and was diagnosed with febrile neutropenia. The patient was treated with an injection of 1 g cefepime four times daily for 2 days and an injection of 1 g doripenem three times daily for 5 days. The second course of intensification chemotherapy included HD-MTX therapy, as in case 1. The patient’s creatinine was 0.82 mg/dL on day 0, his urinary volume on day 1 was 3100 mL, and he had no history of urinary abnormalities. No PPI, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole combinations, or NSAIDs were prescribed to this patient, and his urine pH was maintained above 7.0. Despite careful attention to MTX toxicity, AKI occurred and resulted in a serum MTX concentration of 9.51 nmol/mL and a serum creatinine concentration of 5.95 mg/dL on day 2. Blood tests revealed CPK 29 IU/L, BUN 56 mg/dL (BUN/Cr ratio was 9.41), uric acid 3.0 mg/dL, AST 16 IU/L, and ALT 18 IU/L, suggesting that the main etiology for AKI was MTX toxicity, as in case 1. We performed plasma exchange twice with 5% albumin as the replacement fluid. Hemodialysis was performed twice, and charcoal hemoperfusion once. On day 15, the patient’s plasma MTX concentration was below 1.0 nmol/mL, and leucovorin rescue was continued until day 22. Grade 2 leukopenia, another complication caused by HD-MTX, occurred on day 11 during the blood purification therapy. The patient was discharged from our hospital on day 23. His final serum MTX concentration was 0.04 nmol/mL (day 18), and his creatinine was 1.02 mg/dL (day 23). The clinical course is shown in Fig. 2. The patient later received an unrelated donor bone marrow transplantation and maintained CR.

Fig. 2

Clinical course of case 2. Cr serum creatinine and MTX serum concentration of methotrexate

Case 3

A 72-year-old woman (body surface area 1.44 m²) was diagnosed with primary central nervous system lymphoma 1 month prior to receiving chemotherapy. Induction chemotherapy, consisting of rituximab at 350 mg/m², procarbazine at 100 mg/whole body, MTX at 2 g/m² (over 2 h), and VCR at 1.4 mg/m², was initiated 2 weeks prior to the occurrence of HD-MTX toxicity and led to a decrease in tumor size. Prior to the second course of therapy, the patient developed a urinary tract infection, which was treated with ceftriaxone 1 g once daily. During the second course of therapy, her serum creatinine increased to 2.4 mg/dL, and serum MTX concentration was 7.8 nmol/mL, although creatinine was 0.51 mg/dL on day 0 and urinary volume on day 1 was 4050 mL, and no urinary abnormalities had been noted. Blood tests revealed serum CPK 20 IU/L, BUN 22 mg/dL (BUN/Cr ratio was 10.8), uric acid 6.3 mg/dL, AST 22 IU/L, and ALT 25 IU/L on day 2. We performed plasma exchange with FFP four times and with 5% albumin three times and performed hemodialysis four times. The patient also experienced other complications induced by HD-MTX, including pancytopenia, and developed a fever during blood purification therapy. She was again treated with antibiotics. In this case, we could not easily decrease her serum MTX concentration below 0.5 nmol/L, so we repeatedly performed plasma exchange. The clinical course is illustrated in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Clinical course of case 3. Cr serum creatinine and MTX serum concentration of methotrexate

Despite intensive therapy, the patient’s condition continued to worsen owing to the aggravation of the lymphoma. Finally, she was transferred to hospice.

Summary of blood purification

The conditions of blood purification for the patients in these three cases are summarized in Table 1. MTX reduction rates accomplished with several modalities were estimated using MTX blood concentration before blood purification and on the following day; these results are shown in Table 2.

Table 1 Summary of blood purifications

Table 2 Difference in interval change of MTX concentration by modality

Literature review

AKI due to HD-MTX in hematological malignancies cases may not be rare; however, there have been not so many reported cases that needed blood purifications. We show the summary of previously reported cases as a literature review (Table 3).

Table 3 The blood purifications needed acute kidney injury cases in hematological malignancies

Discussion and conclusions

Here, we present three cases of patients with hematological malignancies who experienced MTX toxicity. An abrupt increase of serum creatinine shortly after administration of HD-MTX is a distinctive feature of HD-MTX-induced AKI [16], suggesting that the major etiology of AKI was HD-MTX administration in these three cases.

The most commonly described mechanism of MTX nephrotoxicity is the crystallization of MTX in the renal tubular lumen; however, other mechanisms have also been proposed, such as constriction of the afferent capillary and direct effects on the mesangial or tubular epithelial cells [16]. Usually, preventive strategies, such as increased hydration and high-dose leucovorin, allow renal recovery without hemodialysis during HD-MTX therapy [1, 3, 15]. Prolonged duration of a high serum concentration of MTX should be avoided [1], because MTX is highly cytotoxic and has multiple potential adverse effects, such as hepatotoxicity and gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicity. Therefore, long-term elevated serum MTX concentrations should be avoided and serum MTX should be kept less than 0.1 nmol/mL [10].

MTX renal toxicity has been graded according to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (grade 1, serum creatinine level < 1.5 × the upper limit of normal range [ULN]; grade 2, 1.5–3.0 × ULN; grade 3, 3.1–6.0 × ULN; grade 4, > 6.0 × ULN) [16]. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 renal failure in patients with osteosarcoma receiving HD-MTX therapy was found to be low (0.6%) [2], and the need for hemodialysis among patients with hematological malignancies was also low; only one patient received hemodialysis out of 194 patients treated with HD-MTX in a retrospective study [17]. Among the three cases presented here, two patients had grade 3 and one had grade 2 renal toxicity according to the WHO classification [16].

The risk of MTX-mediated nephrotoxicity has been shown to increase with advanced age, male sex, MTX dose, low baseline kidney function, and the use of certain antibiotics [18]. The most important factor in patients with hematological malignancies may be the use of concomitant drugs, because patients may receive many of these and the drugs themselves can sometimes directly cause AKI [18]. Moreover, the elimination of MTX from the kidney is affected by concomitant therapies, such as NSAIDs, beta-lactam antibiotics, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole combinations, gemfibrozil, and PPIs [1, 12, 19]. Among beta-lactam antibiotics, tazobactom and piperacillin particularly reduce the clearance of MTX [9, 12]; however, the beta-lactam antibiotics used in these three cases were mainly cefepime and ceftriaxone.

MTX is a relatively small molecule (molecular weight 454), and the protein binding rate and distribution volume are approximately 50% and 0.4–0.8 L/kg, respectively [9, 15, 19]. In the three cases presented here, plasma exchange was the main modality used to eliminate MTX, because it can remove both protein-binding MTX and non-binding MTX; in addition, the MTX concentration increase by rebound is not so rapid [8]. In all of our three cases, although only intermittent measurements of MTX concentration changes were available because of the lack of data, treatment with combined modalities seemed to be the most effective. Plasma exchange alone appeared to have lower efficacy in this retrospective survey, and the volume of replacement fluid might be related to the efficiency of MTX elimination (Table 2).

The most effective method of MTX removal remains to be proven. The blood purification modalities for the elimination of MTX are hemodialysis, plasma exchange, charcoal hemoperfusion, and a combination of these modalities [1, 2, 6, 9, 10, 15, 19,20,21,22]. The heterogeneous methods, variable outcomes, and lack of suitable controls of these reports make comparison difficult. With respect to HD-MTX-induced renal failure in patients with hematological malignancies, hemodialysis conditions differed among the cases (Table 3), and the hemodialysis prescription seemed to be insufficient for MTX elimination, especially in our cases. In our facility, hemodialysis is routinely initiated under the following conditions: 3 h and blood flow of 150 mL/min, and we use a small-size dialyzer to avoid dialysis disequilibrium syndrome. We should have modified the hemodialysis conditions to increase MTX elimination efficiency, namely, through the use of longer treatment times, higher blood flow, and larger dialyzer surface areas. Concerning the elimination rate for MTX, hemodialysis has been considered to be a good modality for eliminating MTX [2]; however, serum MTX concentration could increase rapidly to pre-treatment levels because of rebound [8, 10]. It is presumably correct that the combined modalities, such as simultaneous hemodialysis therapy and plasma exchange, are superior among these therapeutic options [1, 6, 10, 15]. Although Table 3 showed only one previously reported hematological malignancy case treated by simultaneous blood purification modalities [10], combined modalities may have an advantage in hematological malignancy cases because these patients need rapid MTX elimination to avoid worsening pre-existing complications.

Although the three cases we presented here involved no significant renal dysfunction before HD-MTX therapy, AKI occurred after HD-MTX therapy. Among the many risk factors for AKI, specific proteins and genes that affect MTX pharmacodynamics and metabolism should be considered. For instance, genome-wide association studies have found that methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) can alter MTX metabolism [23]. The most common polymorphism of the MTHFR gene is C677T [24], and patients who have the C677T single-nucleotide polymorphism tend to not complete HD-MTX therapy due to adverse effects [25]. While we did not examine the polymorphisms associated with MTX metabolism, it is possible that the presented cases had genetic defects that caused MTX elimination.

There have been reports showing the efficacy of carboxypeptidase-G2 (CPDG₂), which cleaves MTX, in the treatment of MTX toxicity [2, 19, 21]. We could not use CPDG₂ in these cases because it has not been approved in Japan CPDG₂ whereas it was approved in the United States in 2012. As shown in Table 3, the average numbers of blood purification therapy in the cases used CPDG₂ were lower (4.3 times) than those of the cases not used it (6.5 times); however, there was no significant difference.

Here, we report three cases of HD-MTX-induced renal failure in patients with hematological malignancies. Because prolonged elevation of serum MTX concentrations will damage cells, MTX should be eliminated and prompt recognition and effective treatment are essential in patients undergoing therapy who experience numerous complications. Although the efficacy of MTX elimination provided by the various modalities remains unknown, the use of combined methods, such as hemodialysis and plasma exchange, appears superior and desirable.