Skip to main content

Total nephroureterocystectomy and urethrectomy due to urothelial carcinoma associated with the BK polyomavirus infection after kidney transplantation: a case report with literature review

  • The Correction to this article has been published in Renal Replacement Therapy 2020 6:67

Abstract

Background

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection after kidney transplantation is an important cause of graft failure among kidney transplant recipient and may cause malignant tumor, although the association between BKPyV infection and malignant tumor has been controversial yet.

Case presentation

We report a case of a 39-year-old-male kidney transplantation (KTx) recipient with urine BKPyV replication who developed a graft pelvic tumor with the positive Simian virus 40 large T antigen (SV40 TAg). The patients received a living-related KTx from his 65-year-old mother. A protocol biopsy at 14 months after KTx showed BKPyV-associated nephropathy. Therefore, the dose of immunosuppressants was reduced, resulting in improved BKPyV viremia, but viruria persisted. About 117 months after KTx, urine cytology showed atypical cells suspicious for malignancy. Cystoscopy revealed a tumor on the neck of the bladder. Transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TUR-BT) was performed; however, the diagnosis of malignancy was not confirmed at that time. Six months after the TUR-BT, urine cytology showed atypical cells definite for malignancy. Computed tomography and retrograde pyelography showed no evidence of urinary tract tumor and metastasis. Subsequently, total nephroureterocystectomy and urethrectomy were performed. Histological examination of the graft ureter revealed a high-grade urothelial carcinoma, with glandular differentiation, pT1. Immunohistochemically, the tumor showed positivities for SV40 TAg and p53, along with increased Ki67 labeling cells were increased. By contrast, nonneoplastic cells were negative for SV40 TAg. At the time of writing the present manuscript, the patient is free from recurrence or residual tumor and being closely monitored without additional therapy, 32 months after the surgery.

Conclusion

The relationship between BKPyV infection after KTx and bladder carcinogenesis remains to be elucidated. However, when the KTx recipients who continue to have BKPyV infection for a long time are treated, the possibility of risk factors for renourinary carcinoma should always be carefully considered.

Background

In recent years, long-term graft survival for kidney transplantation (KTx) has improved with advances in immunosuppressive therapy. Currently, the widely used strategy for immunosuppression related with KTx is suppression of helper T lymphocyte activity such as tacrolimus (TAC)-based immunosuppression; viral infection is considered as a frequent complication after KTx. In particular, BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is an important cause of nephropathy and graft failure for KTx recipients. BKPyV infection may cause nephropathy in 2–10% of KTx recipients [1,2,3,4,5] and lead to graft loss in approximately 15–80% [1, 5,6,7,8,9]. Furthermore, BKPyV has been known to have a tropism for the genitourinary tract and causes clinical disease. Thus, for immunocompromised patients such as KTx recipients, not only BKPyV-associated nephropathy but also ureteral stenosis and hemorrhagic cystitis would occur.

Recently, the relationship between BKPyV and genitourinary malignant tumor, such as urothelial carcinoma [10, 11] especially in bladder cancer [11,12,13] and renal cell carcinoma [14], has been reported. However, few studies suggested a potential role of BKPyV in the development of urologic tract malignancies in KTx recipients [15], and the association remains controversial. Herein, we describe a case of a KTx recipient with positive urine BKPyV replication who developed a graft pelvic tumor with positive immunohistochemical staining for simian virus 40 large T antigen (SV40 TAg).

Case presentation

A 38-year-old man was diagnosed with chronic kidney disease and underwent hemodialysis. The etiology of his renal failure was unknown. His past medical history included hypertension alone, without a history of malignancy or any exposure to carcinogens. At 39 years of age, the patient received ABO-incompatible living-donor KTx. The donor was his 65-year-old mother. Human leukocyte antigen typing revealed two mismatches, and donor-specific antibody tests were negative. Immunosuppressive therapy comprised TAC, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), methylprednisolone (MP), basiliximab, and rituximab. Plasmapheresis was also performed thrice because of ABO incompatibility. Serum creatinine (sCre) level decreased to 1.76 mg/dL on postoperative day (POD) 5. A protocol biopsy on POD 17 showed no evidence of rejection, and he was discharged on POD 23. Thereafter, TAC, MMF, and MP were continued as immunosuppressive maintenance therapy. Furthermore, his sCre level ranged from 2.0 to 2.4 mg/dL. At 14 months after KTx, his graft function became stable (sCre, 2.49); however, the protocol biopsy showed BKPyV-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) (Fig. 1) incidentally. In addition, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with urine sample detected BKPyV at 4.9 × 107 copies/mL; BKPyV was undetectable in serum PCR test. Therefore, we decreased the dosage of TAC and switched MMF to mizoribine (MZ). Thereafter, the PCR titer of urine BKPyV decreased but persisted (Fig. 2). 98 months after KTx, hematuria was suddenly observed and persisted (urine red blood cell level varied between 10–19 and 50–99/high-power field). Thus, urine cytology was repeated during the follow-up: the patient was noted to suspicious of malignancy by urine cytology and cystoscopy revealed tumor on the neck of the bladder at 117 months after KTx (Fig. 3). Transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TUR-BT) was performed; however, we failed to find the tumor resection and thereby definitive diagnosis was not reached. Thereafter, urine cytological examination was periodically continued, and 6 months after TUR-BT, bladder, and graft urine cytology showed malignant cells (Fig. 4). Although computed tomography and retrograde pyelography showed no significant evidence of urinary tract tumor and metastasis, the patient was finally diagnosed as malignancy. Thereafter, total nephroureterocystectomy and urethrectomy were performed to radically resect the malignant tumor at 124 months after KTx. Grossly, there was a papillary tumor in the uretero-pelvic junction on the kidney graft (Fig. 5). Histologically, the tumor was diagnosed as a high-grade urothelial carcinoma with glandular differentiation, pT1, in the ureter of the allograft. Immunohistochemically, SV40 TAg and p53 were positive in the tumor cells. Ki67− was increased. Nonneoplastic cells failed to show a positive reaction for SV40 TAg staining (Fig. 6). The patient resumed maintenance hemodialysis after the operation. To date, the patient is closely monitored without additional therapy and without recurrence or metastasis for 32 months.

Fig. 1
figure1

Protocol biopsy of transplanted kidney performed on postoperative day 426. a BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (arrow) and b no result of rejection findings [a Simian vacuolating virus 40 large T antigen stain, and b hematoxylin-eosin stain]

Fig. 2
figure2

Patient clinical course. TAC tacrolimus, MMF mycophenolate mofetil, MP methylprednisolone, RIT rituximab, Basi basiliximab, MZ mizoribine, CyA cyclosporine, Cre serum creatinine (mg/dL), BKPyVN BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy, Urine BKPyV urine BK polyomavirus DNA-PCR (copies/mL/day), s/o malignancy suspicious of malignancy

Fig. 3
figure3

Cystoscopy 117 months after kidney transplantation. Cystoscopy showed the papillary tumor existed in the bladder neck

Fig. 4
figure4

Cytology 123 months after kidney transplantation. The bladder and graft urine cytology showed malignant cells, class IV. Hyperchromatic atypical cells with anisocytosis and nuclear enlargement were found, without virus-infected cells (decoy cells). [cytology from the bladder urine; papanicolaou stain]

Fig. 5
figure5

Total nephroureterocystectomy and urethrectomy. a Urinary tract without graft did not show the tumor, and b approximately 10-mm-diameter tumor was located at the graft pelvis

Fig. 6
figure6

Light microscopy findings from the allograft and native kidney. [a, b tumor from the allograft ureter; c, d normal tissue from the native kidney ureter; (e, f normal tissue from graft kidney; a, c, e hematoxylin-eosin stain; b, d, f Simian vacuolating virus 40 large T antigen (SV40 TAg) stain]. b Tumor from the allograft ureter showed positive for SV40 TAg staining. d Other normal tissues were not positive for SV40 TAg staining

Discussion and conclusions

BKPyV primary infection commonly occurred as an asymptomatic, upper respiratory tract infection, or flu-like infection at childhood, and approximately 65–90% of the general population may reach a seroprevalence state [5, 16,17,18,19,20]; thereafter, the virus is considered to remain mainly in the urinary tract. BKPyV infection in KTx recipient develops not only renal dysfunction due to nephropathy but also ureteral stenosis and hemorrhagic cystitis [21]. Moreover, BKPyV has been recently reported as a viral tumor that occurs in immunocompromised hosts such as KTx recipients, together with a long-term allograft survival. The exact effect of BKPyV in KTx recipients remains uncertain; however, the incidence of urinary tract tumor such as bladder tumor and renal cell carcinoma would increase [10,11,12,13,14] throughout BKPyV replication [22, 23].

In general, BKPyVAN showed a positive immunohistochemical staining for SV40 TAg, p53, and Ki67 throughout the upregulation of these markers [24]. However, the role of BKPyV in solid organ recipients is uncertain at present, but urinary tract tumors are among the best candidates for an etiologic association with BKPyV infection. In vitro studies, BKPyV infection could transform cells and cause malignancy in immunosuppressed or immature rodents. BKPyV genomes are divided into three distinct regions: the early viral gene region (EVGR), the late viral gene region (LVGR), and the noncoding control region. EVGR encodes the regulatory proteins large tumor antigen (LTAg), which inactivates the tumor suppressors, pRB and p53 [23]. Kenan et al. also hypothesized that dysregulation of LTag by gene integration of BKPyV with persistent overexpression promotes cell growth, genetic instability, neoplastic transformation, and tumorigenesis [25]. These oncogeneses occur mainly in renourinary organs, including the ureter [23], as in our case. Furthermore, Monini et al. reported that the presence and physical state of BKPyV DNA LTAg gene sequences were amplified by PCR from the prostate, kidney, ureter, and bladder, including these carcinomas [26]. Taking this into consideration, SV40 TAg positivity in tissues indicated BKPyV infection status, and past BKPyV infection may influence malignancy development; thus, SV40 TAg positivity in tissues is associated with BKPyV infectious carcinoma, although not always.

In KTx recipients receiving strong immunosuppressive therapy, viral infection would be a serious problem. Thus, once BKPyV infection is found detected, the reduction of immunosuppressive drugs is recommended [17]. Especially, TAC is a current key drug mainly used as an immunosuppressant for KTx recipients [27]. TAC is identified as a risk factor for developing BKPyV viremia or BKPyVAN [3, 28,29,30], which may reduce the TAC dosage [31]. In this report, the recipient was managed with maintenance immunosuppression consisting of TAC, MMF, and MP, but a protocol biopsy performed at 14 months after KTx revealed subclinical BKPyV-associated nephropathy; thereafter, TAC reduction and anti-metabolite medicine conversion were performed as immunosuppression weakening. After these changes, the PCR titer in urine BKPyV was decreased but remained.

In this case, malignancy was detected about 10 years after KTx. Although during this long duration, the graft kidney might have been exposed to exogenous carcinogens, e.g., smoking or chemical dyes such as aromatic amines, ionizing radiation, and cyclophosphamide, only BKPyV viruria was suspected as the risk factor for malignancy. Urine cytology was routinely performed, and the cellular atypism got higher and finally diagnosed as bladder cancer based on cystoscopy findings. At first, TUR-BT on the neck of the bladder was performed; however, we failed to catch the tumor resection and characteristic evaluation was not performed. Thereafter, repeat urine cytology was performed after TUR-BT to detect malignancy. The grade of malignancy based on urine cytology worsened and finally diagnosing allograft–ureter cancer. Although intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin instillation was considered at that time, the treatment had been abandoned because of the patient status under immunosuppressant. In order to improve the curability, total nephroureterocystectomy and urethrectomy were performed at 124 months after KTx in spite of stable graft function.

For immunochemical staining, urothelial carcinoma was stained positive with SV40 TAg; however, normal tissues, such as native kidney and ureter, and allograft kidney tissues were negative with SV40 TAg staining. SV40 TAg staining is a reliable test for BKPyV infection [32]; therefore, these results suggested that BKPyV infection for a long-term made graft urothelium malignant, and the focus of malignancy was allograft ureter clearly.

As regards the study limitation, detail DNA analysis or fluorescence in situ hybridization was not performed; however, SV40 TAg-positive cells in this case were detected only in the carcinoma tissue, and other tissues were not stained with immunohistochemical staining. Furthermore, we unfortunately failed to catch the bladder tumor during the TUR-BT. Therefore, the relationship between bladder tumor and BKPyV infection remains unclear.

In conclusion, an interesting but challenging case of urothelial carcinoma in allograft is presented for KTx recipients after BKPyV-associated nephropathy with remaining viruria. When the KTx recipients who continue to have BKPyV infection for a long time are treated, the possibility of risk factors not only for BKPyV-associated nephropathy but also for renourinary carcinoma should always be carefully considered. Therefore, we continued careful follow-up by routine urine cytology tests, and the patient was immediately diagnosed with urinary tract carcinoma and total nephroureterocystectomy and urethrectomy were performed.

Literature review

As treatment strategies for BKPyV infection, reducing or stopping immunosuppressive agents, administering intravenous immunoglobulin, cidofovir induction, and others may be considered.

Their treatment efficacies are unclear, and acute rejection may occur from reduced immunosuppressive therapy. There are no antiviral drugs; therefore, screening for BKPyV replication and timely reduction of immunosuppression as the preemptive intervention is currently recommended [31, 33, 34]. Significant BKPyV replication manifests as (a) probable BKPyVAN, defined by sustained BKPyV viremia of > 3 log10 copies/mL in two measurements within 3 weeks; or (b) presumptive BKPyVAN, defined by at least one of two measurements are > 4 log10 copies/mL; or (c) proven BKPyVAN, according to biopsy results [34].

For reduction immunosuppression, two strategies have been recommended by the American Society of Transplantation guidelines: (i) dose reduction of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) by 25–50% in one or two steps, followed by reducing antimetabolites by 50%, followed by discontinuing the latter and (ii) reduction of antimetabolites by 50%, followed by reducing CNI by 25–50%, and then discontinuing antimetabolites. Bischof et al. reported that the “CNI first” immunosuppression reduction strategy leads to similar long-term outcomes in patients with and without BKPyV viremia and is associated with a low risk for clinical antibody-mediated rejection after clearance of BKPyV viremia [31]. In addition, prednisone is typically tapered to 10 mg or less per day [34].

In the standard therapy, the conversion from MMF to MZ is not included because MZ is not available worldwide. In Japan, immunosuppression therapy, including MZ, is used for a compromised host for viral infections such as cytomegalovirus [35, 36]. Therefore, MZ is sometimes administered instead of MMF for the inhibition of BKPyV infection [37, 38].

T cell- and antibody-mediated rejection can occur complicated with BKPyV infection in tandem with immunosuppression reduction. It is required to judge which one is mainly a factor of deterioration of allograft function and may change the treatment strategy, such as whether immunosuppression should be re-increased or not.

Availability of data and materials

All data analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Change history

  • 16 December 2020

    An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

Abbreviations

KTx:

Kidney transplantation

TAC:

Tacrolimus

BKPyV:

BK polyomavirus

SV40 TAg:

Simian virus 40 large T antigen

MMF:

Mycophenolate mofetil

MP:

Methylprednisolone

sCre:

Serum creatinine

POD:

Postoperative day

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

BKPyVAN:

PyV-associated nephropathy

TUR-BT:

Transurethral resection of the bladder tumor

CNI:

Calcineurin inhibitor

References

  1. 1.

    Masutani K. Viral infections directly involved in kidney allograft function. Nephrology. 2018;23(Suppl 2):31–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Masutani K, Shapiro R, Basu A, et al. Putative episodes of T-cell-mediated rejection in patients with sustained BK viruria but no viremia. Transplantation. 2012;94:43–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gard L, van Doesum W, Niesters HGM, et al. A delicate balance between rejection and BK polyomavirus associated nephropathy: a retrospective cohort study in renal transplant recipients. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0178801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Reischig T, Kacer M, Hes O, et al. Viral load and duration of BK polyomavirus viraemia determine renal graft fibrosis progression: histologic evaluation of late protocol biopsies. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019;34:1970–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kotla SK, Kadambi PV, Hendricks AR, et al. BK polyomavirus-pathogen, paradigm and puzzle. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019; Online ahead of print.

  6. 6.

    Wadei HM, Rule AD, Lewin M, et al. Kidney transplant function and histological clearance of virus following diagnosis of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN). Am J Transplant. 2006;6:1025–32.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Drachenberg CB, Beskow CO, Cangro CB, et al. Human polyoma virus in renal allograft biopsies: morphological findings and correlation with urine cytology. Hum Pathol. 1999;30:970–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Howell DN, Smith SR, Butterly DW, et al. Diagnosis and management of BK polyomavirus interstitial nephritis in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation. 1999;68:1279–88.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ramos E, Drachenberg CB, Papadimitriou JC, et al. Clinical course of polyoma virus nephropathy in 67 renal transplant patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13:2145–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Salvatore SP, Myers-Gurevitch PM, Chu S, et al. Polyoma (BK) virus associated urothelial carcinoma originating within a renal allograft five years following resolution of polyoma virus nephropathy. Clin Nephrol. 2016;85:179–83.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Gupta G, Kuppachi S, Kalil RS, et al. Treatment for presumed BK polyomavirus nephropathy and risk of urinary tract cancers among kidney transplant recipients in the United States. Am J Transplant. 2018;18:245–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Grippo PJ, Sandgren EP. Highly invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder in a simian virus 40 T-antigen transgenic mouse model. Am J Pathol. 2000;157:805–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Zhang ZT, Pak J, Shapiro E, et al. Urothelium-specific expression of an oncogene in transgenic mice induced the formation of carcinoma in situ and invasive transitional cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1999;59:3512–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Neirynck V, Claes K, Naesens M, et al. Renal cell carcinoma in the allograft: what is the role of polyomavirus? Case Rep Nephrol Urol. 2012;2:125–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Meier RPH, Müller YD, Dietrich PY, et al. Immunologic clearance of a BK virus-associated metastatic renal allograft carcinoma. Transplantation. 2020; [Epub ahead of print].

  16. 16.

    Knowles WA. Discovery and epidemiology of the human polyomaviruses BK virus (BKV) and JC virus (JCV). Adv Exp Med Biol. 2006;577:19–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hirsch HH, Steiger J. Polyomavirus BK. Lancet Infect Dis. 2003;3(10):611–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Stolt A, Sasnauskas K, Koskela P, et al. Seroepidemiology of the human polyomaviruses. J Gen Virol. 2003;84:1499–504.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Flaegstad T, Ronne K, Filipe AR, et al. Prevalence of anti BK virus antibody in Portugal and Norway. Scand J Infect Dis. 1989;21:145–57.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hariharan S. BK virus nephritis after renal transplantation. Kidney Int. 2006;69:655–62.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Pinto M, Dobson S. BK and JC virus: a review. J Infect. 2014;68(Suppl 1):S2–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Liu S, Chaudhry MR, Berrebi AA, et al. Polyomavirus replication and smoking are independent risk factors for bladder cancer after renal transplantation. Transplantation. 2017;101:1488–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Papadimitriou JC, Randhawa P, Rinaldo CH, et al. BK polyomavirus infection and renourinary tumorigenesis. Am J Transplant. 2016;16:398–406.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Seemayer CA, Seemayer NH, Dürmüller U, et al. BK virus large T and VP-1 expression in infected human renal allografts. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008;23:3752–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kenan DJ, Mieczkowski PA, Burger-Calderon R, et al. The oncogenic potential of BK-polyomavirus is linked to viral integration into the human genome. J Pathol. 2015;237:379–89.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Monini P, Rotola A, Di Luca D, et al. DNA rearrangements impairing BK virus productive infection in urinary tract tumors. Virology. 1995;214:273–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Hart A, Smith JM, Skeans MA, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2017 annual data report: kidney. Am J Transplant. 2019;19(Suppl 2):19–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Hirsch HH, Vincenti F, Friman S, et al. Polyomavirus BK replication in de novo kidney transplant patients receiving tacrolimus or cyclosporine: a prospective, randomized, Treatment with tacrolimus vs. cyclosporine A multicenter study. Am J Transplant. 2013;13:136–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Binet I, Nickeleit V, Hirsch HH, et al. Polyomavirus disease under new immunosuppressive drugs: a cause of renal graft dysfunction and graft loss. Transplantation. 1999;67:918–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Manitpisitkul W, Drachenberg C, Ramos E, et al. Maintenance immunosuppressive agents as risk factors for BK virus nephropathy:a case-control study. Transplantation. 2009;88:83–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Bischof N, Hirsch HH, Wehmeier C, et al. Reducing calcineurin inhibitor first for treating BK polyomavirus replication after kidney transplantation: long-term outcomes. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019;34:1240–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Costigliolo F, Lombardo K, Arend L, et al. BK virus RNA in renal allograft biopsies. J Histochem Cytochem. 2020; [Epub ahead of print].

  33. 33.

    Kasiske BL, Zeier MG, Chapman JR, et al. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients: a summary. Kidney Int. 2010;77:299–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Hirsch HH, Randhawa PS, AST Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. BK polyomavirus in solid organ transplantation-Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. Clin Transplant. 2019;33:e13528.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Yoshimura N, Ushigome H, Akioka K, et al. The beneficial effect of high-dose mizoribine combined with cyclosporine, basiliximab, and corticosteroids on CMV infection in renal transplant recipients. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2013;17:127–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Ishida H, Takahara S, Amada N, et al. A prospective randomized, comparative trial of high-dose mizoribine versus mycophenolate mofetil in combination with tacrolimus and basiliximab for living donor renal transplant: a multicenter trial. Exp Clin Transplant. 2016; Online ahead of print.

  37. 37.

    Funahashi Y, Hattori R, Kinukawa T, et al. Conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to mizoribine for patients with positive polyomavirus type BK in urine. Transplant Proc. 2008;40:2268–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Yuan X, Chen C, Zheng Y, et al. Conversion from mycophenolates to mizoribine is associated with lower BK virus load in kidney transplant recipients: a prospective study. Transplant Proc. 2018;50:3356–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The authors confirm that they received no funding for this study.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.M., M.O., K.U., Y.N., and H.I. participated in research design, writing the article, and performance of the research. H.F., K.Y., Y.K., T.T., J.I., T.S., H.A., K.T., and K.N. contributed to the design and editing of the article. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kohei Unagami.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The authors have no ethical conflicts to disclose. The present case report was approved by our institution’s Institutional Review Board.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests and do not have any relationships to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maenosono, R., Okumi, M., Unagami, K. et al. Total nephroureterocystectomy and urethrectomy due to urothelial carcinoma associated with the BK polyomavirus infection after kidney transplantation: a case report with literature review. Ren Replace Ther 6, 52 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41100-020-00297-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • BK polyomavirus
  • Urothelial carcinoma
  • Kidney transplantation
  • Total nephroureterocystectomy
  • Urethrectomy