Evaluation of modifiable risk factors for peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis: a single-center retrospective cohort study

Abstract

Background

Peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis risk factors can be categorized as modifiable and uncorrectable. We aimed to identify modifiable risk factors for PD-related peritonitis in our facility to prevent PD-related peritonitis and continue quality improvement.

Methods

This retrospective, observational study included 90 patients who started receiving PD after 2008 and who were continued for over 1 year. Twenty-three patients experienced 40 episodes of peritonitis. Several clinical factors identified at peritonitis onset among patients with a peritonitis history were compared with those identified 1 year after PD initiation among patients without a peritonitis history, and a multivariate analysis was performed. Several serum parameter levels were evaluated as time-average concentrations (TACs; from PD initiation to 1 month before peritonitis onset or to 1 year later). The clinical factors to be investigated were selected based on previous studies.

Results

There were no significant between-group differences in baseline characteristics regarding uncorrectable factors and TAC values for serum parameters. Use of exchange devices was significantly higher (95.7% vs 71.6%; p = 0.054) whereas administration of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAS) blockers, calcium channel blockers (CCBs), or oral vitamin D was significantly lower (35.0% vs 65.7%, p = 0.002; 55.0% vs 74.6%, p = 0.036; and 55.0% vs 74.6%, p = 0.036, respectively) in the patients with history of peritonitis, although we did not find a factor independently associated with peritonitis in multivariable logistic regression.

Conclusions

Although hypokalemia, hypoalbuminemia, and exchange device use which are considered as risk factors did not affect peritonitis, administration of RAS blockers, CCBs, and oral vitamin D is significantly larger in patients without peritonitis.

Background

Because of their possibility of shortening the treatment period of peritoneal dialysis (PD), PD-related infections such as peritonitis, exit-site infection, and tunnel infection are important complications among patients on PD. Furthermore, patients with recurrent peritonitis episodes have a worse prognosis [1].

Therefore, prevention of PD-related peritonitis can improve patient survival. It is known that PD-related peritonitis risk factors can be divided into modifiable and uncorrectable. Factors such as malnutrition, overweight, smoking, immunosuppression, no use of oral active vitamin D, psychosocial factors, low socioeconomic status, PD performed against patient’s choice, hypoalbuminemia, hypokalemia, indoor pet breeding, and patient training [2, 3] have been reported to be modifiable risk factors. And active interventions to reduce modifiable risk factors may improve patient outcomes.

The aim of this study was to identify modifiable risk factors for peritonitis to raise the quality of treatment in our facility.

Methods

This retrospective, single-center, cohort study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the St. Marianna University School of Medicine (No. 4568). The study adhered to the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. In addition, patients were given the opportunity to opt out of the study via the hospital website. The study participants included PD patients who started receiving PD between January 2008 and September 2018 and continued it for more than 1 year at the St. Marianna University School of Medicine Hospital. Although 109 patients started PD during the period, this study excluded patients who withdrew from PD in less than a year to calculate time-average concentrations (TACs; details will be described later). We compared patient’s uncorrectable and several clinical factors including modifiable risk factors between patients with and without the history of PD-related peritonitis. In addition to the items listed in the introduction, modifiable risk factors included the use of laxatives [4], assisted PD [5], use of exchange devices [6], living conditions, and occupational status. Also, other clinical factors such as performance status (PS) [7] at PD initiation and use of commonly used medications for the treatment of frequent complications were examined.

The categorical variables identified at the onset of peritonitis among patients with peritonitis and those identified at 1 year after the initiation of PD which is considered to be stable period among patients without peritonitis were evaluated. Serologic tests associated with nutritional status, potassium metabolism, and chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) such as serum albumin, potassium, magnesium, corrected calcium, inorganic phosphorus, and intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels were evaluated as TACs. TAC was defined from 1 month after PD initiation to 1 month before peritonitis onset for patients with peritonitis to exclude the effect of peritonitis and from 1 month after PD initiation to 1 year later for patients without peritonitis (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

How to evaluate time-average concentration (TAC)

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as median [quartile] or mean ± standard deviation according to data distribution. For comparisons of categorical variables, Pearson’s chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were used. For determining correlations between continuous variables, Student’s t-test and Mann–Whitney U test were used. In addition, for multivariate analysis, logistic regression analysis was used. A p-value of <0.05 was considered to be significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the JMP pro 13 software (SAS Institute Japan Co, Ltd. Tokyo, Japan).

Results

We analyzed 90 PD patients. The characteristics and clinical factors including modifiable risk factors of patients with and without the history of PD-related peritonitis are shown in Table 1. There was no significant difference in uncorrectable characteristics between groups. PS at PD initiation was better in the group without peritonitis (rate of PS 0 was 69.6 vs 89.6%; p = 0.001). Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAS) blockers, calcium channel blockers (CCBs), and oral vitamin D use were significantly lower and psychiatric disorder, assisted PD, and exchange device use prevalences were significantly higher in the peritonitis group than in the group without peritonitis. The breakdown of psychiatric disorders was 3 patients in dementia and 1 patient in developmental disorder in peritonitis group and 1 patient in dementia and 1 patient in developmental disorder in non-peritonitis group. However, the other examined factors including serologic test were not significantly different between the two groups.

Table 1 Patient characteristics and clinical factors of patients with or without the history of peritonitis

Variables with a p-value < 0.05 according to a univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis. However, we did not find a factor independently associated with peritonitis (Table 2).

Table 2 Multivariable logistic regression of variables with significant change according to the univariate analysis

There were a total of 40 episodes of peritonitis in 23 patients (Table 3). The median incidence time for the first peritonitis episode was 14 (8–31) months after PD initiation. Of the 40 dialysate peritonitis cultures examined, gram-positive cocci (GPC) were found in 14 and gram-negative bacilli (GNB) in 13, and the remaining 13 were culture-negative (CN). Furthermore, 1 case was GPC and 2 cases were CNB in the dialysate peritonitis cultures of patients without exchange devices, and also, 13 cases were GPC, 11 cases were GNB, and 13 cases were CN in those of the patients using exchange devices. Among the 23 patients with peritonitis, 11 patients were repeaters of peritonitis. The breakdown of repeaters according to definition [8], 5 cases were “relapse,” 1 case was “repeat,” and 5 cases were the others. And among dialysate peritonitis cultures of relapse cases, 2 cases were GPC, 2 cases were GNB, and 1 case was CN. The characteristics and clinical factors for patients with single episode of peritonitis and repeaters are compared in Table 3; no significant difference was found between the two groups. Of the 40 peritonitis episodes, 10 resulted in PD withdrawal (GPC 2 episodes, GNB 6 episodes, CN 2 episodes).

Table 3 Patient characteristics and clinical factors of patients with single history or repeated of peritonitis

Discussion

The present study identified several clinical factors that were significantly more common in patients with peritonitis than in those without it. The following are discussion, respectively, for each factor.

Hypoalbuminemia is a well-known risk factor for peritonitis because serum albumin is an indicator of nutritional status [9, 10]. However, our results showed that hypoalbuminemia was not a risk factor for peritonitis among our cohort. Some studies have reported data similar to ours and have shown no relationship between serum albumin levels and peritonitis risk [11, 12], suggesting that hypoalbuminemia, instead of being a risk factor, is a result of the inflammatory response in patients with peritonitis.

Hypokalemia has been linked to peritonitis due to decreased bowel peristalsis, which may result in intestinal bacterial overgrowth [13]. However, the TACs for potassium levels were not significantly different between patients with and without peritonitis. Although the incidence of peritonitis has been reported to increase more than 3-fold at when potassium levels fall below 3.5 mEq/L [14], in our patients, even at peritonitis onset, average serum potassium level was 3.9±0.6 mEq/L, and no association between hypokalemia and peritonitis could be shown.

Administration of antihypertensive agent in particular RAS blockers and CCBs was significantly larger in the group without peritonitis. Although it may simply be due to the patient’s good PS in the present study (PS 0 patients with hypertension vs PS more than 1 with hypertension; 86.9% vs 34.8%, p < 0.001), there are also reports that the administration of RAS blockers and CCBs had association with or positive effect on infectious diseases. For example, in RAS blockers, it was found that angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 contributed to the regulation of amino acid transport in the intestinal epithelium and the maintenance of homeostasis of the intestinal flora, and it is considered that it may affect dysbiosis [15]. And in CCBs, Wiewel et al. reported that prior CCB use is associated with reduced mortality in patients following ICU admission with sepsis [16]. Although the multivariable logistic regression does not show independent association between RAS blockers and peritonitis, because of when we deal hypertension as an intermediate variable, RAS blockers were independently associated with peritonitis (OR 0.385, 95% CI 0.157–0.943, p = 0.037), we would like to further investigate that relationship.

Other than CKD-MBD and normal bone development and maintenance, it has been reported that the actions of vitamin D are diverse, including autoimmune diseases, neurological diseases, and pregnancy. And in the PD field, oral active vitamin D therapy of 0.25 μg/day or more reportedly reduces the relative risk of peritonitis [17, 18], and our study also showed a probable effect of vitamin D on peritonitis prevention. The vitamin D signaling pathways regulate both the innate and adaptive immunity, maintaining the associated inflammatory response within physiological limits [19, 20]. In the critical care field, administration of calcitriol to intensive care unit hospitalized patients with sepsis increased the expression of the antibacterial peptide cathelicidin and significantly reduced mortality compared to the placebo group [21] or decreased expression of the inflammatory cytokines IL-1 and IL-6 was observed [22]. A randomized controlled clinical trial examining the effects of oral vitamin D supplementation on the prevention of PD-related peritonitis is ongoing [23]. On the other hand, none of the serological laboratory findings associated with CKD-MBD showed a significant difference between the two groups.

Depression has been reported to be the leading psychiatric disorder associated with peritonitis, but cognitive dysfunction affected the majority of patients in this study. Immediate memory dysfunction, rather than general cognitive impairment, can predict a higher risk of PD-related peritonitis [24]. Therefore, we must keep in mind that regular assessments of a patient’s cognitive function may help prevent peritonitis.

Finally, there are few reports that show effectiveness of ultraviolet or heated plate germicidal exchange devices [25, 26], and contrary to expectations, patients who used exchange devices exhibited high risk of peritonitis in our study, likely because the procedure was more independent in patients not using exchange devices. On the other hand, about half of the exchange device users have peritonitis caused by GNB, and the fact that even if the exchange device is used, this rate of peritonitis develops suggests the importance of preventing endogenous peritonitis.

The primary limitations of our study include the relatively small number of patients and the retrospective cohort design. Thus, the multivariate analysis we performed in the present study was insufficient to show the relationship between PD-related peritonitis and some medicines. Further investigations including more patients and using prospective, long-term observation methods are necessary to support our conclusions.

Conclusions

We identified several modifiable risk factors associated with PD-related peritonitis that can improve the quality of treatment in our facility. In particular, administration of RAS blockers, CCBs, and oral vitamin D is significantly larger in patients without peritonitis, whereas serum albumin or potassium levels and exchange device use did not appear to affect peritonitis risk.