Skip to main content

Two cases of obturator hernia in patients undergoing hemodialysis: case report and literature review

Abstract

Background

Obturator hernia (OH) is an extremely rare abdominal wall hernia with risk factors including aging, female sex, emaciation, and increased abdominal pressure. Its symptoms are nonspecific, and diagnosis is often delayed; however, this delay can lead to a fatal course. Therefore, early diagnosis and surgical intervention are necessary to reduce the mortality rate associated with OH. Considering the risk factors for OH, patients currently undergoing hemodialysis (HD) may be particularly vulnerable to OH. Here, we report two cases of OH in patients undergoing HD along with a review of the relevant literature.

Case presentation

Case 1 included a 76-year-old female undergoing HD due to autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. She was hospitalized for upper abdominal pain, vomiting, and diarrhea. On the day of hospitalization, she was diagnosed with OH using computed tomography and underwent emergency surgery. Case 2 included a 90-year-old emaciated female who was admitted to our hospital for projectile vomiting while undergoing HD. She was diagnosed with OH and shock, but surgery was not performed due to shock. Nonetheless, her blood pressure gradually increased, and she completely recovered. Spontaneous reduction in OH was confirmed on the third day of hospitalization. Both patients recovered well.

Conclusions

The symptoms of OH are non-specific, and certain symptoms such as vomiting and anorexia are often overlooked because they are common in patients undergoing HD. It is important to include OH in the differential diagnosis of digestive organ symptoms in patients undergoing HD, especially in those with risk factors for OH, such as elderly female patients on HD due to autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

Background

Obturator hernia (OH) is a rare disorder defined as the protrusion of the abdominal contents through the obturator foramen [1]. OH is more likely to develop in females; the elderly; multiparous, emaciated people; and those with increased intra-abdominal pressure due to complications [2]. OH is often undiagnosed or unsuspected because it is not apparent externally or palpably and is associated with nonspecific symptoms and signs [2]. Moreover, OH has serious consequences as delayed diagnosis often results in a severe disease course [3]. Thus, patients with risk factors for OH should be examined carefully.

Patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) tend to be elderly [4], emaciated [5], and can have an increased intra-abdominal pressure if they suffer from autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) [6]. Despite being a rare complication, the incidence of OH in patients undergoing HD may be higher than that in the general population because of the characteristics of these patients. We report two cases of OH in patients undergoing HD along with a review of the literature.

Case presentation

Case 1

A 76-year-old female with ADPKD had undergone HD for two years. Her body mass index was 15.7 (weight, 38.2 kg; height, 156 cm), and she had previously delivered two children. Eight months previously, she had intermittent pain radiating from the right hip to the right thigh. She was diagnosed with disk herniation (L5/S1) by orthopedics and administered analgesics, but her pain worsened. She was admitted to our hospital for an intensive examination and treatment of upper abdominal pain, vomiting, and diarrhea lasting one day. On arrival, her body temperature was 36.9 °C, blood pressure was 174/93 mmHg, and heart rate was 92 beats per minute. A distended abdomen without tenderness or muscle guarding and hypoactive bowel sounds were noted on physical examination. There was no rebound pain or mass in the abdomen. The results of blood examinations were normal (Table 1).

Table 1 Laboratory data on the admission of case 1

Plain abdominal radiography revealed a dilated loop of the small intestine. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a dilated small bowel and ascites (Fig. 1a). A low-density mass was noted between the pectineus and right external obturator muscles (Fig. 1b), and the patient was diagnosed with incarcerated OH. She was transferred to another hospital and underwent immediate emergency laparotomy, the findings of which revealed that a loop of the ileum, approximately 50 cm from the ileocecal valve, had herniated into the right obturator canal. A small perforation was noted on the incarcerated piece. Five centimeters of the perforated ileal segment were resected, and the defect at the site of the hernia was closed using non-absorbable interrupted sutures. The operation duration was 98 min. The patient recovered gradually and was discharged 10 days after surgery. The right hip pain resolved after surgery.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Abdominal axial computed tomography images (case 1). a Dilated small bowel and ascites. b A low-density mass with a clear border located between the pectineus and right external obturator muscles (arrow)

Case 2

A 90-year-old female had been undergoing HD for 24 years due to chronic nephritis. Her body mass index was 18.2 (weight, 38.3 kg; height, 145 cm), and she had previously delivered one child. She was previously diagnosed with anorexia (which lasted one month) and right thigh pain (which lasted for two weeks). She experienced a sudden attack of projectile vomiting during HD, following which the vomiting occurred repeatedly. On admission to our hospital, her body temperature was 38.2 °C, blood pressure was 197/81 mmHg, and heart rate was 83 beats per minute. Physical examination revealed hypoactive bowel sounds without distension, tenderness, or muscle guarding, and the laboratory results were unremarkable (Table 2). Plain abdominal radiography revealed a dilated loop in the small bowel. CT revealed dilation of the small bowel and ascites. A low-density mass was also noted between the pectineus and right external obturator muscles (Fig. 2a); however, this finding was overlooked at that time. She was hospitalized with a diagnosis of enteroparesis, and monitored continuously. Eight hours after hospitalization, her blood pressure gradually declined to 67/25 mmHg, and she developed shock. One day after hospitalization, a radiologist commented that the etiology of the ileus was OH based on radiological findings. We consulted a surgical team; however, emergency surgery was avoided because the patient was not expected to recover from the surgery due to the long duration of dialysis and her advanced age. However, two days after admission, her blood pressure gradually increased. Three days after admission, follow-up CT confirmed that the OH had spontaneously reduced (Fig. 2b). The vomiting and right hip pain resolved completely. The patient was discharged 11 days after admission. Moreover, her appetite significantly improved after discharge. Elective surgical repair was considered. However, the patient and her family declined the surgery because of her advanced age, even though there was a possibility of recurrence. At nine-month follow-up, she was doing well and had no recurrence of the obturator hernia.

Table 2 Laboratory data on the admission of case 2
Fig. 2
figure 2

Abdominal axial computed tomography images (case 2). a A low-density mass with a clear border located between the pectineus and right external obturator muscles (arrow). b The low-density mass disappeared

Discussion and conclusions

OH is a type of abdominal wall hernia that occurs when the internal organs of the abdominal cavity protrude from the obturator canal through which the obturator nerves and vessels pass [7]. OH has a higher incidence in females due to the greater width of the pelvis and larger obturator canal [8]. Right-sided OH is more common than left-sided ones since the left obturator foramen may be covered by the sigmoid colon [7]. The prevalence of bilateral OH was reported in only 6% of cases [9]. The protruding organ is usually the small intestine and intestinal obstruction is a clinical presentation [3]. OH is a rare disease, accounting for 0.07–1% of all abdominal wall hernias [10, 11], and is responsible for 0.4% of all patients with mechanical bowel obstruction [2]. However, it has a mortality rate of 12–70%, the highest of all abdominal wall hernias [12, 13]. The high mortality rate is attributed to the hernial orifice of the obturator foramen, which is narrow; once OH develops, it can easily develop into a strangulated hernia that obstructs blood flow and progresses to intestinal necrosis and perforation of the intestinal tract [11, 13, 14].

Since OH is a rare type of hernia [2], there are not enough reports to indicate the prevalence of OH in patients undergoing HD. However, various facts indicate that patients undergoing HD may be more likely to develop OH. Preperitoneal fat and lymphatic tissue in the obturator canal normally form a cushion around the neurovascular bundle to prevent herniation. When this fatty tissue is lost due to malnutrition, the risk of OH increases [15]. Malnutrition is a significant problem in patients undergoing HD due to uremia and amino acid loss from dialysis membranes [5]. Moreover, ADPKD increases intra-abdominal pressure and induces OH [16], although ADPKD accounts for just 4% of the etiologies of end-stage renal disease [4, 6].

A delayed diagnosis along with subsequent delayed surgical treatment in OH cases may cause intestinal strangulation, which compromises intestinal viability; this adversely affects the morbidity and mortality rates [2]. Therefore, patients with suspected OH should be confirmed early by abdominopelvic CT. Identification of a mass-like lesion between the obturator externus and pectineus muscles on CT is the gold standard for the diagnosis of OH [8, 17]. However, it is difficult to diagnose OH for several reasons. First, contrary to other abdominal wall hernias, a palpable groin mass is not noticeable in OH because the hernial mass is usually hidden beneath the pectineus muscle [10]. Second, most patients with OH present with non-specific abdominal symptoms resulting from mechanical bowel obstruction such as nausea, vomiting, and pain associated with abdominal cramps [18]. Such non-specific abdominal symptoms are often considered to be due to other benign etiologies. Third, even signs specific to OH are difficult to identify. The Howship–Romberg sign is a definitive indicator of OH and is caused by the compression of the obturator nerve by the hernia sac, resulting in pain on the medial side of the ipsilateral thigh during internal rotation of the hip joint [15]. However, this sign is observed only in 15–50% of all OH cases [3]. Furthermore, it is often confused with the symptoms of orthopedic diseases, such as arthritis and trauma [3]. The Hannington-Kiff sign is characterized by the loss of the thigh adductor reflex despite a positive patellar reflex [19]. This sign is also attributed to compression of the obturator nerve and is considered even more specific than the Howship–Romberg sign [3]. However, this sign is often not noticed unless physicians examine neurological findings carefully. Moreover, muscle reflexes in the lower extremities are not usually identified on physical examination for abdominal symptoms [20].

Diagnosing OH may be more difficult in patients undergoing HD due to non-specific abdominal symptoms, which are commonly observed due to the high prevalence of gastroparesis (delayed gastric emptying) and constipation in these patients compared with the general population [21, 22]. In a previous report, a patient undergoing HD with nausea and vomiting was misdiagnosed with reflux esophagitis and ileus until the autopsy revealed OH [23]. Furthermore, lower extremity pain such as the Howship–Romberg sign have also been commonly reported in patients undergoing HD [23, 24] because the mean age of these patients has increased due to the advanced age of these patients [4]. There are a few reports of OH in patients undergoing HD with the Howship–Romberg sign; however, in these reports, the sign did not lead to the diagnosis of OH [23, 24]. In Case 1, lower extremity pain was considered a symptom of disk herniation. Abdominopelvic CT taken eight months later finally led to a diagnosis of OH. We should have suspected OH based on the abovementioned non-specific and common symptoms and performed a CT scan. However, it should be noted that even CT findings are often overlooked, as seen in Case 2 and the previous report [23].

OH often has already progressed to a strangulated hernia at diagnosis [11, 14]. Therefore, the basic treatment for OH comprises urgent surgical repair of the incarceration and surgical closure of the hernia defect [25]. A previous study investigating 86 cases of OH showed that the mortality rate after 30 days was 5.5% in patients who underwent surgery (n = 73, including emergency procedures in 59 cases) and 46.1% in patients who did not receive surgical treatment due to their comorbidities, poor general status, and high operation risk (n = 13) [15], which confirms that surgery is the optimal treatment. As an option other than emergency surgery, the usefulness of manual reduction or ultrasound-guided reduction has been reported [26, 27]. This noninvasive retraction is considered to be performed in all cases; however, if it the lesion is not repaired, emergency surgery should be performed [26]. It is also stated that a standby closure surgery of the hernia defect should be performed after noninvasive reduction [26]. There are a few report of OH cases that spontaneously reduced, such as Case 2, and the course after reduction has not been fully elucidated [28]. However, spontaneous reduction cases may recur through the same hernia defect and require surgical repair [28], as in noninvasive retraction cases. In any case, surgical repair should be considered as a definitive treatment of obturator hernia.

Further, we conducted a literature review regarding OH in patients with HD. We searched medical databases, including MEDLINE and Google Scholar, and found only five cases reported previously (Table 3) [16, 23, 24, 29, 30]. Similar to the reports of patients not undergoing dialysis, there were more reports of elderly, emaciated females. Patients undergoing HD for a long time are reported more frequently; this is probably because they are prone to sarcopenia [31], which may cause OH. The etiology of end-stage renal disease in half of the reported cases was ADPKD. ADPKD may be a risk factor for OH as it is associated with an increase in intra-abdominal pressure. The mean time elapsed between the onset of abdominal symptoms and treatment was 1–2 days, which was shorter than that in previous reports (4–6 days) [3]. Patients undergoing HD may be diagnosed earlier because their frequency of visiting a medical facility for HD is approximately three times a week. However, we found the report of one case that was diagnosed at autopsy after death [23]. Patients undergoing HD tend to have multiple risk factors for OH and abdominal symptoms. Moreover, the Howship–Romberg sign tends to be misunderstood as being caused by benign complications and is thus overlooked in these patients. Therefore, cases of OH in patients undergoing HD could be under-reported, and in some cases, death might have occurred because OH was undiagnosed.

Table 3 Review of the literature on obturator hernia in hemodialysis patients

This report has a few limitations. We could not count unreported cases of patients who had died, in whom OH was undiagnosed, or who had an unfortunate clinical outcome. Therefore, it is impossible to discuss the prognosis of patients undergoing HD with OH from the limited number of cases.

Conclusion

Herein, we report two cases of OH in patients undergoing HD. OH is infrequent, difficult to diagnose, and has a serious course. Considering that patients undergoing HD tend to have multiple risk factors for OH, the incidence of OH in these patients may be higher than that in the general population. The symptoms of OH are non-specific and can be confused with symptoms of benign conditions commonly observed in patients undergoing HD. This report aims to emphasize and highlight the importance of including OH in the differential diagnosis of patients undergoing HD with abdominal symptoms, especially those with risk factors for OH, such as advanced age, emaciation, and ADPKD, in order to reduce the mortality rate associated with OH in these patients.

Availability of data and materials

The data and materials relevant to this case report are all included in this manuscript.

Abbreviations

OH:

Obturator hernia

HD:

Hemodialysis

ADPKD:

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease

CT:

Computed tomography

References

  1. Stamatiou D, Skandalakis LJ, Zoras O, Mirilas P. Obturator hernia revisited: surgical anatomy, embryology, diagnosis, and technique of repair. Am Surg. 2011;77:1147–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313481107700926.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schizas D, Apostolou K, Hasemaki N, Kanavidis P, Tsapralis D, Garmpis N, et al. Obturator hernias: a systematic review of the literature. Hernia. 2021;25:193–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-020-02282-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rodríguez-Hermosa JI, Codina-Cazador A, Maroto-Genover A, Puig-Alcántara J, Sirvent-Calvera JM, Garsot-Savall E, et al. Obturator hernia: clinical analysis of 16 cases and algorithm for its diagnosis and treatment. Hernia. 2008;12:289–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-007-0328-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nitta K, Goto S, Masakane I, Hanafusa N, Taniguchi M, Hasegawa T, et al. Annual dialysis data report for 2018, JSDT renal data registry: survey methods, facility data, incidence, prevalence, and mortality. Ren Replace Ther. 2020;6:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsuneyoshi S, Matsukuma Y, Kawai Y, Hiyamuta H, Yamada S, Kitamura H, et al. Association between geriatric nutritional risk index and stroke risk in hemodialysis patients: 10-years outcome of the Q-Cohort study. Atherosclerosis. 2021;323:30–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2021.03.006.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Harris PC, Torres VE. Polycystic kidney disease. Annu Rev Med. 2009;60:321–37. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.med.60.101707.125712.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Mandarry MT, Zeng SB, Wei ZQ, Zhang C, Wang ZW. Obturator hernia: a condition seldom thought of and hence seldom sought. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27:133–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-011-1289-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leitch MK, Yunaev M. Difficult diagnosis: strangulated obturator hernia in an 88-year-old woman. BMJ Case Rep. 2016;2016:bcr2016215428. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2016-215428.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Khaladkar SM, Kamal A, Garg S, Kamal V. Bilateral obturator hernia diagnosed by computed tomography: a case report with review of the literature. Radiol Res Pract. 2014;2014:625873. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/625873.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Chang SS, Shan YS, Lin YJ, Tai YS, Lin PW. A review of obturator hernia and a proposed algorithm for its diagnosis and treatment. World J Surg. 2005;29:450–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-004-7664-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Petrie A, Tubbs RS, Matusz P, Shaffer K, Loukas M. Obturator hernia: anatomy, embryology, diagnosis, and treatment. Clin Anat. 2011;24:562–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.21097.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. De Clercq L, Coenegrachts K, Feryn T, Van Couter A, Vandevoorde R, Verstraete K, et al. An elderly woman with obstructed obturator hernia: a less Common variety of external abdominal hernia. JBR-BTR. 2010;93:302–4. https://doi.org/10.5334/jbr-btr.345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Igari K, Ochiai T, Aihara A, Kumagai Y, Iida M, Yamazaki S. Clinical presentation of obturator hernia and review of the literature. Hernia. 2010;14:409–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-010-0658-z.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Thanapaisan C, Thanapaisal C. Sixty-one cases of obturator hernia in Chiangrai Regional Hospital: retrospective study. J Med Assoc Thail. 2006;89:2081–5.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li Z, Gu C, Wei M, Yuan X, Wang Z. Diagnosis and treatment of obturator hernia: retrospective analysis of 86 clinical cases at a single institution. BMC Surg. 2021;21:124. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01125-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Jung JH, Song JH, Ahn SH. Obturator hernia in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2018;37:178–9. https://doi.org/10.23876/j.krcp.2018.37.2.178.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Park J. Obturator hernia: clinical analysis of 11 patients and review of the literature. Medicine. 2020;99:e21701. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021701.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hodgins N, Cieplucha K, Conneally P, Ghareeb E. Obturator hernia: a case report and review of the literature. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2013;4:889–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2013.07.012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hannington-Kiff JG. Absent thigh adductor reflex in obturator hernia. Lancet. 1980;1:180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(80)90664-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Diab J, Badiani S, Berney CR. A decade review of emergency obturator hernia repairs. ANZ J Surg. 2021;91:1596–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.17011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Vlem B, Schoonjans R, Vanholder R, De Vos M, Vandamme W, Van Laecke S, et al. Delayed gastric emptying in dyspeptic chronic hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000;36:962–8. https://doi.org/10.1053/ajkd.2000.19094.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yasuda G, Shibata K, Takizawa T, Ikeda Y, Tokita Y, Umemura S, et al. Prevalence of constipation in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients and comparison with hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;39:1292–9. https://doi.org/10.1053/ajkd.2002.33407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ohta E, Suzuki H, Shibuya A, Katsube M, Nakamura Y, Saito H, et al. Autopsy of a hemodialysis patient with polycystic kidney disease complicated by obturator hernia. Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi. 2007;40:367–73. https://doi.org/10.4009/jsdt.40.367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sato S, Yamagishi S, Haruta K, Ishibe A, Matsuo K, Nakano A. A case of recurrent obturator hernia repaired with a kugel patch. Nihon Fukubu Kyukyu Igakkai Zasshi. 2012;32:1263–6.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Karasaki T, Nomura Y, Tanaka N. Long-term outcomes after obturator hernia repair: retrospective analysis of 80 operations at a single institution. Hernia. 2014;18:393–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-013-1159-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Maeda Y, Nakahara O, Saito S, Nasu J, Baba H. Ultrasound-guided non-invasive retraction for strangulated obturator hernia allows elective radical surgery: analysis of 12 cases. Surg Case Rep. 2021;7:83. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-021-01165-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Tanaka N, Kikuchi J, Ando T. Elective plug repair of an incarcerated obturator hernia by the thigh approach after noninvasive manual reduction: report of two cases. Surg Today. 2010;40:181–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-008-4025-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Leow JJ, How KY, Goh MH, Woon WWL, Low JK. Non-operative management of obturator hernia in an elderly female. Hernia. 2014;18:431–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-012-1036-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee AB, Waffle CM, Trebbin WM, Solomon RJ. Clostridial myonecrosis. Origin from an obturator hernia in a dialysis patient. JAMA. 1981;246:1232–3. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.246.11.1232.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kasumoto H, Hazeki S, Nariyama S, Kimura T, Kitagawa A, Tada H, et al. A case of a male hemodialysis patient who developed an obturator hernia. Nihon Toseki Igakkai Zasshi. 2013;46:1083–7. https://doi.org/10.4009/jsdt.46.1083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ren H, Gong D, Jia F, Xu B, Liu Z. Sarcopenia in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis: incidence rate, risk factors and its effect on survival risk. Ren Fail. 2016;38:364–71. https://doi.org/10.3109/0886022X.2015.1132173.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KY and MK wrote the initial drafts. KY, MK, JH, TH, SF, and SE participated in the discussion and treatment of the patients. HM and TN reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript and agreed with its submission to this journal.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mineaki Kitamura.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present report and all procedures described in this report have been carried out in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nagasaki Renal Center (Nagasaki, Japan) (21007).

Consent for publication

Written informed consents were obtained from the patients for the publication of this case report.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamaguchi, K., Kitamura, M., Hashiguchi, J. et al. Two cases of obturator hernia in patients undergoing hemodialysis: case report and literature review. Ren Replace Ther 8, 23 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41100-022-00411-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41100-022-00411-w

Keywords

  • Aging
  • Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease
  • Hemodialysis
  • Intestinal obstruction
  • Obturator hernia