Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Effects of early and late continuous renal replacement therapy on intensive care unit mortality in patients with COVID-19 with acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute kidney injury: a comparative study

Renal Replacement Therapy volume 10, Article number: 35 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is linked to disease severity and prognosis in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and mortality increases even with milder stages. This study primarily investigated the effects of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) timing on intensive care unit (ICU) mortality in patients with COVID-19 with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and AKI. Secondary goals were secondary goals for the ICU, days without life support treatment, and change in post-CRRT day biomarker levels, the length of ICU and overall hospital stay.

Methods

In this retrospective study, patients with COVID-19 with ARDS and AKI were divided into CRRT initiated at AKI stages 1 and 2, early-CRRT (E-CRRT) and AKI stage 3, late-CRRT (L-CRRT) and followed until discharge or death.

Results

E-CRRT had 20 patients and L-CRRT had 18 patients. No association between CRRT timing and ICU mortality was detected (p = 0.724). Moreover, the timing was not associated with ICU, total hospital stay, or days without life support treatment. However, it was associated with D-dimer levels for both groups and ferritin and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels for E-CRRT. There were no associations for other markers, such as procalcitonin, troponin T, pro-brain natriuretic peptide (pro-BNP), interleukin-6, fibrinogen, or antithrombin III levels.

Conclusions

CRRT timing was not associated with ICU mortality, total hospital stay, or days without life support treatment in this cohort. For E-CRRT, ferritin and CRP levels, and for both groups, D-dimer levels, were associated with CRRT timing. Randomized controlled trials are needed to examine the effects of CRRT timing in patients with COVID-19 with ARDS and AKI.

Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), primarily manifests with pulmonary diseases such as pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), with the latter being seen in between 40% and 96% of patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) [1,2,3,4,5]. Although the proportion of these patients with ARDS requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) was reported differently in each study, it is crucial to note that it is always associated with high mortality [1, 3, 5,6,7,8,9]. ICU mortality of patients with COVID-19 with ARDS differs between 16% and as even high as 78% [2,3,4,5, 9,10,11,12]. In addition to extensive pulmonary damage, COVID-19 could cause extrapulmonary complications, such as thrombotic complications, myocardial injury, and acute kidney injury (AKI) [13, 14].

AKI is the most common ARDS-associated extrapulmonary complication and has been reported in up to 46% of hospitalized and 89% of critically ill patients with COVID-19 [15, 16]. This renal damage is acute tubular necrosis due to impaired renal perfusion caused by the decreased cardiac flow rate due to increased intrathoracic pressure attributable to mechanical ventilation. Additionally, extensive lung injury causes hypoxemia, hypercapnia, acidosis, and microthrombi on renal vascular resistance, which could contribute to renal hypoperfusion [17,18,19]. In addition, the development of AKI could impact gas exchange in the lungs via hypervolemia, inflammation, and decreased pulmonary capillary permeability, causing a destructive loop to both organs [20, 21].

Furthermore, AKI is an independent risk factor for mortality in patients with ARDS [15, 22, 23] and has been found to indicate multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and COVID-19 disease severity [24]. A multicentric study detected that AKI development significantly increases in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19 with ARDS [25]. Of these patients who develop AKI, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is required for up to 30% of them. Unfortunately, if CRRT is indicated in a critically ill patient with COVID-19-associated AKI, the risk of mortality becomes significantly higher (> 60%) [14, 26].

Renal replacement therapy (RRT) includes CRRT, intermittent RRT, and peritoneal dialysis techniques [27]. CRRT is the most common RRT modality used in the ICU to treat AKI, as it provides better volume management and electrolyte imbalance correction. Moreover, it increases metabolic control and decreases hypotension, especially in hemodynamically unstable patients [28]. It is reportedly required for up to 35% of critically ill patients with COVID-19 [29]. Among these patients, CRRT is helpful for those complicated with ARDS with fluid overload due to refractory hypernatremia and unresponsiveness to diuretics and conservative treatments [30].

RRT should be started without delay if life-threatening AKI complications such as hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis, and pulmonary edema are present [28]. Early initiation of CRRT might be considered to achieve negative fluid balance and fluid restriction in patients with complicated COVID-19. Therefore, exploring the effects of initiation timing (early or late) of CRRT on mortality in patients with COVID-19 with ARDS and AKI is required to determine the optimal time to initiate CRRT.

The primary aim of this study was to compare the effects of early and late CRRT on ICU mortality in patients with COVID-19 with ARDS and AKI. The secondary aims compared the length of ICU stay, total hospital stay, days without life support treatment in ICU, and change in pre- and post-CRRT day biomarker levels in the same groups.

Methods

This retrospective study was approved by the Istanbul University Hospital Institutional Review Board with decision number 2020/523 on 8 May 2020. Written informed consent was waived due to the retrospective design of the study. Furthermore, all methods were performed following the relevant guidelines and regulations. Finally, the manuscript is written per the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines [31].

Selection and description of participants

The study was conducted on patients admitted to the ICU of Istanbul University Hospital between 19 March and 12 June 2020.

Inclusion criteria

  • Being older than 18 years

  • Being admitted to the ICU

  • Having a COVID-19 diagnosis with ARDS and AKI:

    • Infection with COVID-19 was determined by a positive result on a reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay of a nasopharyngeal swab collected by the local hospital health authority

    • ARDS diagnosis and staging were made according to the Berlin definition [32]

    • AKI diagnosis and staging were made according to creatinine levels (only) in the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury [28]

  • Requiring CRRT

Exclusion criteria

  • Being younger than 18 years

  • Already undergoing regular dialysis treatment

    • Chronic dialysis

    • Patients who underwent kidney transplantation

Technical information

  • Research Question: In a population of patients with COVID-19 with ARDS and AKI, is early CRRT more associated with lower ICU mortality than late CRRT?

Study design

In this retrospective cohort study, patients were divided into two groups according to AKI stages [28, 33] for a more focused evaluation of factors, stratified as AKI stage 1–2 and AKI stage 3, as stated in Levey et al. [34]:

  1. 1.

    CRRT initiated at AKI stages 1 and 2 (early-CRRT group: E-CRRT): Patients with hypervolemia unresponsive to medical treatment (unresponsive to diuretics for more than 12 h and < 0.5 mL/kg/h urine output)

  2. 2.

    CRRT initiated at AKI stage 3 (Late-CRRT group: L-CRRT): Patients with urgent need of RRT [acidosis, hyperkalaemia, and anuria (12 h of no urine output or output of < 0.3 mL/kg/h urine output in the last 24 h)]

Aims

  • Primary: to compare the effects of early- and late-CRRT on ICU mortality in patients with COVID-19 with ARDS and AKI

  • Secondary: to compare the effects of early- and late-CRRT on:

    • ICU stay

    • Total hospital stay (ICU and ward days combined)

    • Days without life support treatment in the ICU (not requiring any of the below)

      • CRRT

      • IMV

      • Vasopressor (VP)

    • Change in pre- and post-CRRT day biomarker levels

      • C-reactive protein (CRP)

      • Procalcitonin (PCT)

      • Ferritin

      • Troponin-T (TnT)

      • Pro-brain natriuretic peptide (pro-BNP)

      • Interleukin 6 (IL-6)

      • D-dimer

      • Fibrinogen

      • Antithrombin III (AT III)

in patients with COVID-19 with ARDS and AKI. The patients were followed from admission to discharge from the ICU or death.

CRRT application

CRRT was applied as continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration using Ultraflux® AV1000S (Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Hamburg, Germany). The settings were 100 mL/min for blood flow rate, 2000 mL/h for replacement fluid, 1000 mL/h for dialysate fluid, and 20–25 mL/h for the ultrafiltration rate. The parameters were adjusted individually according to the cardiac situation, volume load, and urine output. Anticoagulation was achieved with regional citrate. Hemofilter and extracorporeal circuits were changed every 72 h unless obstructed, or any other mechanical complications arose, and then they were changed earlier. The patients received CRRT in a continuous manner, meaning 24/7 following its initiation in the ICU. They were followed up daily clinically (fluid input/output) and with routine renal function tests. Once the kidney function was evaluated to be ready for weaning off, first, the ultrafiltration feature of the machine was turned off, and then the patient was observed. If there was satisfactory urine output, the hemofiltration feature was also turned off, concluding the entire CRRT process.

Data collection

Data were collected from the hospital’s electronic health records system. Gender, age, ARDS severity, comorbidities, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) scores were obtained on ICU admission. The scores mentioned were used to evaluate the comorbidities systematically. Patients presenting with active cancer of any kind were classified as having a malignant condition. In addition, complications such as cardiac complications, liver failure, secondary infections, and coagulopathy were collected.

Additionally, the need for life support treatment (CRRT, IMV, and VP within the first 28 days after ICU admission) was obtained. The length of hospital and ICU stay and mortality were recorded. Finally, the following laboratory data on the day of AKI development (pre-CRRT) and the first day after CRRT (post-CRRT) were recorded: CRP, PCT, ferritin, TnT, pro-BNP, IL-6, D-dimer, fibrinogen, AT III. Post-CRRT values were the results after the end of each patient’s continuous treatment.

Statistics

Descriptive statistics were presented using mean and standard deviation, median (and minimum–maximum).

The normality test was done with the Shapiro–Wilk test. Non-parametric statistical methods were used for values with skewed (non-normally distributed. Shapiro–Wilk p > 0.05) distribution. Furthermore, non-parametric statistical methods were used for values with skewed distribution.

Finally, the Mann–Whitney U test compared two non-normally distributed independent groups. The χ2 test (Fisher’s exact test) was used for categorical variables and expressed as observation counts (and percentages). In addition, logistic regression was used to investigate the effect of parameters on the CCRT.

Statistical significance was accepted when the two-sided p-value was lower than 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using the MedCalc Statistical Software version 12.7.7 (MedCalc Software bvba. Ostend. Belgium; http://www.medcalc.org; 2013).

Results

In total, 38 patients (N = 38) were included. E-CRRT had 20 patients and L-CRRT had 18 patients. The baseline characteristics of the study population are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 Characteristics of the early and late continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) groups
Full size table

The only statistically significant difference was between E-CRRT and L-CRRT regarding malignity during admittance (p < 0.05). The proportion of malignity was found to be higher in L-CRRT.

Outcomes

The primary aim of this study was to investigate and compare the effects of early- and late-CRRT on ICU mortality. The secondary outcomes were length of ICU stay, total hospital stay, and days without life support treatment in the ICU (CRRT, IMV, and VP). The analyses for both aims, except the biomarkers (presented separately below), are presented in Table 2.

Table 2 Outcome analyses
Full size table

There was no statistically significant difference between pre- and post-CRRT ICU mortality, ICU stay, total hospital stay (p = 0.724, p = 0.426, p = 0.654, respectively), or days without life support treatment (days without CRRT p = 0.111, days without IMV p = 0.199, days without VP p = 0.553).

Effect of CCRT timing on biomarkers

The early or late initiation of CRRT was not associated with significant differences in post-CRRT levels in PCT, TnT, pro-BNP, IL-6, fibrinogen, or AT III. Furthermore, CRP, ferritin, and D-dimer had significant results, and their analyses are presented in Table 3.

Table 3 Biomarkers in the first day of AKI development compared with the post-continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) first day according to CRRT timing
Full size table

In E-CRRT, there were statistically significant differences between pre- and post-CRRT CRP, ferritin, and D-dimer levels (p = 0.013, p = 0.03, p = 0.015, respectively). The mean of CRP and D-dimer was lower on post-CRRT first day than pre-CRRT levels. On the contrary, the mean of ferritin was higher on post-CRRT first day than pre-CRRT levels. Moreover, for D-dimer, there was a statistically significant difference between pre- and post-CRRT levels in terms of L-CRRT (p = 0.015 and p = 0.011, E- and L-CRRT, respectively).

Discussion

The current study primarily investigated and compared the effects of early- and late-CRRT on ICU mortality in patients with COVID-19 with ARDS and AKI. The secondary aims were length of ICU stay, total hospital stay, days without life support treatment in ICU, and change in pre- and post-CRRT day biomarker levels. The results demonstrated that the timing of CRRT was not associated with ICU mortality. Moreover, it had no association with ICU and combined hospital stay or days without life support treatment such as IMV, VP, or CRRT. Contrarily, the timing was associated with a significant change in pre- and post-CRRT day biomarkers: D-dimer levels for both groups and ferritin and CRP levels for E-CRRT (Table 3).

The COVID-19 strain in Turkey during the period of study is thought to be analogous to 19A, 20A, and 20B variants of the virus [35]. The most common extrapulmonary manifestation of them is kidney involvement [36]. In COVID-19, AKI may develop due to direct viral damage, hypoxemia, coagulopathy, hypovolemia, use of nephrotoxic agents, and cytokine storm [37]. AKI is associated with the severity and prognosis of the disease in patients with COVID-19, and mortality increases even with the milder AKI stages [38,39,40]. Therefore, AKI should be approached quickly and effectively. The best management of AKI involves reducing risks to a minimum and utilizing best-supporting treatments [41].

Previously identified risk factors for AKI development in patients with COVID-19 are advanced age, comorbidities associated with cardiovascular complications, and severe disease requiring ICU follow-up, IMV, and VP [37]. In our study, E-CRRT and L-CRRT patients had similar comorbidities and were not statistically significant except for malignity. However, their APACHE II, SOFA, and SAPS scores, calculators for severity and mortality, were not statistically significant. Therefore, malignity did not have an overall impact because the established scoring systems had already incorporated it into their calculation [42].

Patients with COVID-19 in ICU requiring CRRT have been reported to be between 5% and 23% [1, 2, 9, 12]. For managing AKI with ARDS, CRRT is vital in treating associated complications such as hemodynamic instability. CRRT increases oxygenation, decreases extravascular fluid in the lungs, and restores acid–base balance in patients with ARDS [43]. Therefore, the early initiation of CRRT might facilitate the management of volume status in COVID-19 [44].

A literature gap exists regarding CRRT timing on COVID-19 mortality [43]. Only a single study at the time of manuscript revision was found regarding CRRT in a patient population with all of the sample size having AKI and ARDS simultaneously. However, the timing was not studied there, too [45]. Hence, the current study was conducted to shed light on this unexplored side: CRRT timing in severely ill patients with COVID-19.

Furthermore, a vast amount of research is evaluating the effect of CRRT timing and conservative approaches on mortality in patients with AKI who do not have COVID-19. Among them, the advantages of early CRRT initiation have been demonstrated in observational studies, but different results were indicated in a meta-analysis of randomized studies in patients without COVID-19 [33, 46, 47]. Therefore, a consensus is yet to be achieved about the effects of early CRRT intervention. In the current study, decreasing the inflammatory markers and hypervolemia with early initiation of CRRT was not associated with ICU mortality, total hospital or ICU stay duration, or the number of days without IMV, VP, or CRRT. These results concur with the literature on patients with AKI who do not have COVID-19 [46].

Organ cross-talk significantly affects the course of COVID-19, which is a cytokine-mediated process. Among these, IL-6 is one of the most critical proinflammatory cytokines linked to mortality [48]. Its upregulation resulting from renal tubular epithelial damage causes ARDS through extensive lung epithelial and endothelial injury. This insult causes hypoxia and further damages the oxygen supply-sensitive renal medulla [48]. Furthermore, the correlation between IL-6 and fibrinogen levels in COVID-19 with ARDS indicates that thrombotic complications are associated with an inflammatory response (immunothrombosis) [49]. As a result, organ failures, including AKI, occur through similar hemodynamic and cellular mechanisms in COVID-19. To treat these, Raina et al. reported that CRRT could filter inflammatory mediators and stabilize immunity non-selectively to restore balance to the immune system [50]. Current results suggested no association between CRRT timing and post-CRRT IL-6 or fibrinogen levels.

Among other biomarkers, TnT levels were reported to be correlated with CRP, PCT, D-dimer, and pro-BNP levels, and patients with high TnT levels have been reported to develop ARDS, malignant arrhythmias, coagulopathy, and AKI at a higher rate [51]. In the reported study, CRRT timing was not associated with TnT, PCT, pro-BNP, or AT III levels. However, it was associated with D-dimer levels for both groups and ferritin and CRP levels for E-CRRT. It is essential to note the significant change in D-dimer levels for both groups, which is shown to correlate with COVID-19 disease severity in a systematic review and meta-analysis [52]. For ferritin and CRP levels associated with E-CRRT, it could be because the earlier CRRT starts, the less likely it is to be a significant change as the already-mild levels regularly decrease.

These results suggest that E-CRRT could decrease inflammation by clearing various inflammatory markers and mediators concurrent with the literature [53]. However, CRRT alone is inadequate in controlling cytokine levels [43]. Different methods, such as direct hemoperfusion with a neutro-macroporous sorbent, plasma adsorption on a resin after separation of plasma from whole blood, CRRT with hollow fiber filters with adsorptive properties, and high-dose CRRT with medium or high cutoff membranes are available to control the cytokines and prevent a cytokine storm [48, 54].

In summary, this study demonstrated that the timing of CRRT initiation was not associated with ICU mortality. Moreover, it was not associated with ICU, combined hospital stay, or days without life support treatment such as IMV, VP, or CRRT. Additionally, there were no significant changes in IL-6 or fibrinogen levels. Therefore, initiation of CRRT should only be reserved in patients with COVID-19 with ARDS and AKI, where AKI and its complications cannot be managed or must be prevented.

Limitations

The current study has a few major limitations. Firstly, this was a single-center study, which impacts sample size and generalizability. Secondly, the data were retrospectively obtained from the electronic medical records, which led to some chunks of data being unavailable, which could have hindered looking into potential associations. These include, but might not be limited to, the continuous data for diuretic use and urine output for evaluating renal function during the totality of ICU stay (including the post-CRRT ICU stay) and the time between the onset of COVID-19-related symptoms and the start of CRRT for correlating kidney function with pre-CRRT disease progression. To address these limitations, multicentric studies with larger sample sizes, preferably randomized trials, should be conducted to understand the importance of CRRT timing further.

Conclusions

In this cohort, the timing of CRRT was not associated with ICU mortality. However, it was associated with D-dimer levels for both groups and ferritin and CRP levels for E-CRRT, though it had no association with ICU stay, combined hospital stay, or days without life support treatment such as IMV, VP, or CRRT. Moreover, there was no association between CRRT timing and PCT, TnT, pro-BNP, IL-6, fibrinogen, or AT III levels. Randomized clinical trials with larger sample sizes are required to understand the impact of CRRT timing in patients with COVID-19 with ARDS and AKI deeply.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, et al. China medical treatment expert group for COVID-19. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1708–20. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2002032.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan. China Lancet. 2020;395:497–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan. China JAMA. 2020;323:1061–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.1585.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhatraju PK, Ghassemieh BJ, Nichols M, Kim R, Jerome KR, Nalla AK, et al. COVID-19 in critically ill patients in the Seattle region—Case series. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:2012–22. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2004500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Arentz M, Yim E, Klaff L, Lokhandwala S, Riedo FX, Chong M, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of 21 critically ill patients with COVID-19 in Washington State. JAMA. 2020;323:1612–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.4326.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Du RH, Liu LM, Yin W, Wang W, Guan LL, Yuan ML, et al. Hospitalization and critical care of 109 decedents with COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan. China Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020;17:839–46. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202003-225OC.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Grasselli G, Zangrillo A, Zanella A, Antonelli M, Cabrini L, Castelli A, COVID-19 Lombardy ICU Network, et al. COVID-19 lombardy ICU network. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy Region, Italy. JAMA. 2020;323:1574–81. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.5394.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, Crawford JM, McGinn T, Davidson KW, the Northwell COVID-19 Research Consortium, et al. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City area. JAMA. 2020;323(20):2052. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.6775.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang X, Yu Y, Xu J, Shu H, Xia J, Liu H, et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:475–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30079-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang Y, Lu X, Li Y, Chen H, Chen T, Su N, et al. Clinical course and outcomes of 344 intensive care patients with COVID-19. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;201:1430–4. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202003-0736LE.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Myers LC, Parodi SM, Escobar GJ, Liu VX. Characteristics of hospitalized adults with COVID-19 in an integrated health care system in California. JAMA. 2020;323:2195–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.7202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395:1054–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gupta A, Madhavan MV, Sehgal K, Nair N, Mahajan S, Sehrawat TS, et al. Extrapulmonary manifestations of covid-19. Nat Med. 2020;26:1017–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0968-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gupta S, Coca SG, Chan L, Melamed ML, Brenner SK, Hayek SS, et al. Aki treated with renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with covid-19. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021;32:161–76. https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2020060897.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chan L, Chaudhary K, Saha A, Chauhan K, Vaid A, Baweja M, et al. Acute kidney injury in hospitalized patients with covid-19. medRxiv 2020;2020.05.04.20090944. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.04.20090944.

  16. Luther T, Bülow-Anderberg S, Larsson A, Rubertsson S, Lipcsey M, Frithiof R. COVID-19 patients in intensive care develop predominantly oliguric acute kidney injury. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2021;65:364–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13746.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Husain-Syed F, Slutsky AS, Ronco C. Lung-kidney cross-talk in the critically ill patient. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;194:402–14. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201602-0420CP.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sharkey RA, Mulloy EM, O’Neill SJ. The acute effects of oxygen and carbon dioxide on renal vascular resistance in patients with an acute exacerbation of COPD. Chest. 1999;115:1588–92. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.115.6.1588.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fogagnolo A, Grasso S, Dres M, Gesualdo L, Murgolo F, Morelli E, et al. Focus on renal blood fow in mechanically ventilated patients with SARS-CoV-2: a prospective pilot study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-020-00633-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Bellomo R, Kellum JA, Ronco C, Wald R, Martensson J, Maiden M, et al. Acute kidney injury in sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43:816–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4755-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Legrand M, Bell S, Forni L, Joannidis M, Koyner JL, Liu K, et al. Pathophysiology of COVID-19-associated acute kidney injury. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2021;17:751–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-021-00452-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu KD, Glidden DV, Eisner MD, Parsons PE, Ware LB, Wheeler A, et al. Predictive and pathogenetic value of plasma biomarkers for acute kidney injury in patients with acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:2755–61.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Clemens MS, Stewart IJ, Sosnov JA, Howard JT, Belenkiy SM, Sine CR, et al. Reciprocal risk of acute kidney injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome in critically ill burn patients. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:e915–22. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000001812.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ronco C, Reis T, Syed F. Management of acute kidney injury in patients with COVID-19. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:738–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30229-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang F, Ran L, Qian C, Hua J, Luo Z, Ding M, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of acute kidney injury in covid-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a multicenter retrospective study. Blood Purif. 2021;50:499–505. https://doi.org/10.1159/000512371.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gabarre P, Dumas G, Dupont T, Darmon M, Azoulay E, Zafrani L. Acute kidney injury in critically ill patients with COVID-19. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:1339–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06153-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Davenport A. Renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury: which method to use in the intensive care unit? Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2008;19:529–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kellum JA, Lameire N, KDIGO AKI Guideline Work Group. Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 1). Crit Care. 2013;17:204. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc11454.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang X, Tian S, Guo H. Acute kidney injury and renal replacement therapy in covid-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Immunopharmacol. 2021;90: 107159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2020.107159.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Shang Y, Pan C, Yang X, Zhong M, Shang X, Wu Z, et al. Management of critically ill patients with COVID-19 in ICU: statement from front-line intensive care experts in Wuhan. China Ann Intensive Care. 2020;10:73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00689-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, STROBE Initiative. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12:1495–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, ARDS Definition Task Force, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012;307:2526–33. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.5669.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zarbock A, Kellum JA, Schmidt C, Van Aken H, Wempe C, Pavenstädt H, et al. Effect of early vs delayed initiation of renal replacement therapy on mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: the ELAIN randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315:2190–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.5828.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Levey AS, et al. The definition, classification, and prognosis of chronic kidney disease: a KDIGO Controversies Conference report. Kidney Int. 2011;80(1):17–28. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2010.483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Eskİer D, Akalp E, Dalan Ö, KarakÜlah G, Oktay Y. Current mutatome of SARS-CoV-2 in Turkey reveals mutations of interest. Turk J Biol. 2021;45:104–13. https://doi.org/10.3906/biy-2008-56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Li Y, Hu Y, Yu J, Ma T. Retrospective analysis of laboratory testing in 54 patients with severe- or critical-type 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia. Lab Invest. 2020;100:794–800. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41374-020-0431-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Mallhi TH, Khan YH, Adnan AS. Stratification of acute kidney injury in COVID-19. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020;103:2164–7. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-0794.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Cheng Y, Luo R, Wang K, Zhang M, Wang Z, Dong L, et al. Kidney disease is associated with in-hospital death of patients with COVID-19. Kidney Int. 2020;97:829–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2020.03.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Murugan R, Karajala-Subramanyam V, Lee M, Yende S, Kong L, Carter M, Genetic and Inflammatory Markers of Sepsis (GenIMS) Investigators, et al. Acute kidney injury in non-severe pneumonia is associated with an increased immune response and lower survival. Kidney Int. 2010;77:527–35. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2009.502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sileanu FE, Murugan R, Lucko N, Clermont G, Kane-Gill SL, Handler SM, et al. AKI in low-risk versus high-risk patients in intensive care. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;10:187–96. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.03200314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Pickkers P, Ostermann M, Joannidis M, Zarbock A, Hoste E, Bellomo R, et al. The intensive care medicine agenda on acute kidney injury. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43:1198–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-017-4687-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Godinjak A, Iglica A, Rama A, et al. Predictive value of SAPS II and APACHE II scoring systems for patient outcome in a medical intensive care unit. Acta Med Acad. 2016;45:97–103. https://doi.org/10.5644/ama2006-124.165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ankawi G, Neri M, Zhang J, Breglia A, Ricci Z, Ronco C. Extracorporeal techniques for the treatment of critically ill patients with sepsis beyond conventional blood purification therapy: the promises and the pitfalls. Crit Care. 2018;22:262. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2181-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Kazory A, Ronco C, McCullough PA. SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) and intravascular volume management strategies in the critically ill. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2020.1754700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Alharthy A, Faqihi F, Memish ZA, Balhamar A, Nasim N, Shahzad A, et al. Continuous renal replacement therapy with the addition of CytoSorb cartridge in critically ill patients with COVID-19 plus acute kidney injury: A case-series. Artif Organs. 2021;45:E101–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.13864.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gaudry S, Hajage D, Benichou N, Chaïbi K, Barbar S, Zarbock A, et al. Delayed versus early initiation of renal replacement therapy for severe acute kidney injury: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. Lancet. 2020;395:1506–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30531-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. STARRT-AKI Investigators; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Timing of initiation of renal-replacement therapy in acute kidney injury. New England J Med. 2020;383(3):240–51. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2000741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ronco C, Reis T. Kidney involvement in COVID-19 and rationale for extracorporeal therapies. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020;16:308–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-020-0284-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Connors JM, Levy JH. COVID-19 and its implications for thrombosis and anticoagulation. Blood. 2020;135:2033–40. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2020006000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Raina R, Chakraborty R, Sethi SK, Bunchman T. Kidney replacement therapy in COVID-19 induced kidney failure and septic shock: a pediatric continuous renal replacement therapy [PCRRT] position on emergency preparedness with resource allocation. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:413. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.00413.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Guo T, Fan Y, Chen M, Wu X, Zhang L, He T, et al. Cardiovascular implications of fatal outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19). JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5:811–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Mitra S, Ling RR, Yang IX, Poon WH, Tan CS, Monagle P, et al. Severe COVID-19 and coagulopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2021;50:325–35. https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2020420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Gao N, Yan C, Zhang G. Changes of serum procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-17 (IL-17), interleukin-6 (IL-6), high mobility group protein-B1 (HMGB1) and D-dimer in patients with severe acute pancreatitis treated with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and Its clinical significance. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:5881–6. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.910099.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. La Manna G, Donati G. Coupled plasma filtration adsorption: a multipurpose extracorporeal detoxification therapy. Blood Purif. 2018;46:228–38. https://doi.org/10.1159/000490234.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the staff of Istanbul University Medical Faculty Intensive Care Unit for their work, and Erol Barbur, MD, for his professional assistance with the critical revision of the manuscript, language editing, and submission processes.

Disclaimers

The views expressed in the submitted article are the authors’ own and are not the official position of any institutions or funders.

Funding

The authors did not receive any grants, equipment, drugs, or other support that facilitated the conduct of the work described in the article or for the article’s writing itself.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Topkapı Mahallesi, Turgut Özal Millet Caddesi, 34093, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey

    Verda Tuna, Emre Senturk, Gunseli Orhun, Ozlem Polat, Ilkay Anakli, Gulcin Alay, Emre Celiksoy, Mehmet Kilic, Mercan Mutlu, Esen Figen & Perihan Ergin Ozcan

Authors
  1. Verda Tuna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emre Senturk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gunseli Orhun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ozlem Polat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ilkay Anakli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Gulcin Alay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Emre Celiksoy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mehmet Kilic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Mercan Mutlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Esen Figen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Perihan Ergin Ozcan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

V.T.: conceptualization, formal analysis, methodology, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. E.S.: data curation, project administration. G.O.: data curation, validation. O.P.: data curation, project administration. I.A.: data curation, project administration. G.A.: data curation, validation. E.C.: data curation, writing—review and editing. M.K.: data curation, writing—review and editing. M.M.: data curation, validation. E.F.: supervision, methodology. P.E.G.: supervision, writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Verda Tuna.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This retrospective study was approved by the Istanbul University Hospital Institutional Review Board with decision number 2020/523 on 8 May 2020. The study was conducted on the patients admitted to the Istanbul University Hospital, Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Istanbul (Turkey), between 19 March and 12 June 2020. Written informed consent was waived due to the study’s retrospective design.

Consent for publication

Waived due to the retrospective design of the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tuna, V., Senturk, E., Orhun, G. et al. Effects of early and late continuous renal replacement therapy on intensive care unit mortality in patients with COVID-19 with acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute kidney injury: a comparative study. Ren Replace Ther 10, 35 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41100-024-00549-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41100-024-00549-9

Keywords

Renal Replacement Therapy

ISSN: 2059-1381

Contact us