Skip to main content
Download PDF

Range of plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels in hemodialysis patients at a high risk of 1-year mortality and their relationship with the nutritional status: a retrospective cohort study in one institute

Renal Replacement Therapy volume 6, Article number: 32 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels are used as a marker of heart failure, which is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients. BNP levels increase as renal function declines. The range of BNP levels associated with satisfactory longevity in dialysis patients currently remains unknown.

Methods

In total, 660 patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis were enrolled. BNP levels were measured at the end of the year and in a follow-up to assess 1-year mortality between 2008 and 2012. Patients were divided into six groups according to BNP levels: < 50 (reference), 50 to < 100, 100 to < 300, 300 to < 500, 500 to < 1000, and ≥ 1000 pg/mL. One-year mortality at each BNP level was analyzed using Cox’s proportional hazards model after adjustments for confounding factors.

Results

During the follow-up period, 78 (11.8%) deaths were recorded. After adjustments for confounding factors, such as gender, age, hemodialysis vintage, and primary disease, the risk of 1-year mortality was significantly high with BNP levels of 500 to < 1000 (hazard ratio [HR] 3.010; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.065–10.729; P = 0.037) and more than 1000 pg/mL (HR 5.291; 95%CI 2.014–18.170; P = 0.0003). After adjustments for Kt/V, the risk of 1-year mortality was also significantly high with BNP levels of 500 to < 1000 (HR 3.045; 95%CI 1.065–10.929; P = 0.037) and more than 1000 pg/mL (HR 5.221; 95%CI 1.943–18.165; P = 0.0006). Following further adjustments for nutritional factors, such as albumin levels, total cholesterol levels, the normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR), body mass index (BMI), and percent creatinine generation rate (%CGR), BNP levels of 500–1000 (HR 1.990; 95%CI 0.639–7.570; P = 0.244), and more than 1000 pg/mL (HR 2.100; 95%CI 0.663–8.105; P = 0.213) were no longer risk factors.

Conclusion

In dialysis patients, a BNP level ≥ 500 pg/mL is a risk factor for 1-year mortality. The risk associated with high BNP levels is reduced by nutritional factors, which suggests a relationship between high BNP levels and the nutritional status. In conclusion, efforts are needed to maintain BNP levels at lower than 500 pg/mL and improve the nutritional status.

Background

Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels are used as a marker of heart failure [1], which is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis patients. BNP levels in these patients are crucial for diagnosing and assessing the severity of heart failure and predicting future cardiovascular morbidity and mortality [2]. Plasma BNP levels increase with declines in renal function, and BNP levels are elevated in hemodialysis patients, even in the absence of heart failure. However, the normal threshold of BNP levels in hemodialysis patients currently remains unknown.

The range of BNP levels in hemodialysis patients needs to be clarified in order to ensure satisfactory longevity. Therefore, the present study investigated the relationship between plasma BNP levels and 1-year mortality in hemodialysis patients and examined the range of BNP levels associated with an improved prognosis.

Methods

In total, 660 patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis were enrolled in the present study. BNP levels were measured at the end of the year and in a follow-up to assess 1-year mortality between 2008 and 2012. The hazard ratio (HR) for 1-year mortality was evaluated in six groups of patients divided according to BNP levels: BNP < 50 (control), 50 ≤ BNP < 100, 100 ≤ BNP < 300, 300 ≤ BNP < 500, 500 ≤ BNP < 1000, and 1000 ≤ BNP. Analyses were performed in four steps. In the first step, we adjusted for basal confounding factors, such as gender, age, hemodialysis vintage, and primary disease. In the second step, we adjusted for Kt/V as a prescriptive factor. In the third step, we adjusted for nutritional factors, including serum albumin levels, total cholesterol levels, the normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR), body mass index (BMI), and percent creatinine generation rate (%CGR). In the fourth step, we adjusted for transthyretin (also known as prealbumin) levels.

A blood sample was obtained before the first hemodialysis session of the week. BNP levels were measured using the automatic enzyme immunoassay device AIA-600II® (TOSO CORPORATION) with E-test TOSO II (BNP).

All statistical analyses were performed using JMP (ver.10). P values less than 0.05 were considered to be significant.

The present study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Kenwakai Hospital (No. 2019008).

Results

The baseline characteristics of study participants are shown in Table 1 . Among 660 patients, 446 (67.6%) were male. As the primary disease, 318 (48.2%) had chronic glomerulonephritis (CGN), 255 (38.6%) diabetic nephropathy (DN), and 87 (13.2%) other diseases. Regarding patient characteristics related to heart disease, 578 (87.6%) out of 660 patients were prescribed antihypertensive agents, while 147 (22.3%) had a history of acute coronary syndrome, coronary intervention, or coronary surgery. Aortic stenosis and/or regurgitation of more than moderate severity according to the ACC/AHA practice guidelines were noted in 40 (6.2%) out of 645 patients examined by echocardiography. Mitral regurgitation of more than moderate severity and/or severe was detected in 26 (4.0%) out of 645 patients examined by echocardiography. Heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction (< 40%) was observed in 18 (2.80%) out of 641 patients examined by echocardiography. The most common hemodialysis vintage was 5–10 (29.7%). As a hemodialysis prescription factor, Kt/V values were the most frequently distributed between 1.4 and < 1.6 (30.6%). Nutritional factors were nPCR, serum albumin levels, total cholesterol levels, BMI, and %CGR. In the analysis of targeting factors, 147 patients had a BNP level of 100 to < 200 pg/mL (22.3%), and 143 had a transthyretin level of 20 to < 25 mg/dL (21.8%). As shown in Table 2 , the mean age was 68.5 ± 12.9 years and mean vintage was 6.48 ± 5.09 years.

Table 1 Background characteristics of the study participants
Full size table
Table 2 Mean values of factors in study participants
Full size table

Table 3 shows the prognosis of study participants. During the observation period, there were 78 deaths (11.8%). Table 4 shows the causes of death: heart failure in 19, cerebrovascular disease in 13, infection in 11, cachexia/uremia in 10, sudden death in 6, malignant tumors in 5, gastrointestinal disease in 5, and myocardial infarction in 4. Table 5 shows HR for 1-year mortality after adjustments for confounding factors. DN as the primary disease was a significantly higher risk factor (HR 2.11; 95%CI 1.31–3.45; P = 0.0018) than CGN. Kt/V values of 1.0 to < 1.2 were a significantly higher risk factor than 1.2 to < 1.4 (HR 2.42; 95%CI 1.12–5.18; P = 0.02). N-PCR values of 0.5 to < 0.7 were a significantly higher risk factor than 0.7 to < 0.9 (HR 2.07; 95%CI 1.26–3.42; P = 0.0039). Serum albumin levels of 3.0 to < 3.5 g/dL were a significantly higher risk factor (HR 3.25; 95%CI 1.87–5.88; P < 0.0001) than 3.5 to < 4.0 g/dL. %CGR of 60–70% was a significantly higher risk factor than 90 to < 100% (HR 2.75; 95%CI 1.11–9.92; P < 0.030). Transthyretin levels of 15 to < 20 mg/dL were a significantly higher risk factor than 20 to < 25 mg/dL (HR 3.86; 95%CI 1.92–8.00; P = 0.0002).

Table 3 Prognosis of study participants
Full size table
Table 4 Causes of death
Full size table
Table 5 Cox’s proportional hazard ratio of prognostic correcting factors
Full size table

Figure 1 shows the results obtained in the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of BNP levels. The 1-year survival rate was significantly low at a BNP level > 300 pg/mL. Figure 2 shows the estimated cubic spline transformation of the relationship between BNP levels and HR for 1-year mortality adjusted for age, gender, dialysis vintage, and primary diseases. BNP levels in hemodialysis patients correlated with 1-year mortality. Figure 3 shows a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the relationship between BNP levels and 1-year mortality. The area under the curve was 0.69, and the cut-off value was 299.2 pg/mL. Table 6 shows HR for 1-year mortality at each BNP level relative to that less than 50 pg/mL. After adjustments for basal confounding factors (gender, age, primary disease, and hemodialysis vintage) (model 1), comparisons with the reference group revealed that BNP levels of 500 to < 1000 pg/mL were a significantly high-risk factor (HR 3.01; 95%CI 1.07–10.73; P < 0.037), as were those higher than 1000 pg/mL (HR 5.29; 95%CI 2.01–18.17; P < 0.0003). After further adjustments for Kt/V values (model 2), similar results were obtained to those in model 1. A BNP level higher than 500 pg/mL was significantly high. After further adjustments for five nutritional factors (nPCR, serum albumin levels, BMI, total cholesterol levels, and %CGR) (model 3), BNP levels higher than 500 pg/mL were not significant. Table 7 also shows HR for 1-year mortality at each BNP level. Models 1 and 2 were the same as those in Table 6, whereas model 4 showed HR further adjusted for transthyretin. BNP levels higher than 500 pg/mL were also not significant.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of BNP levels. One-year survival rates were 95.5% at BNP <50 pg/mL, 95.0% at 50-100 pg/mL, 90.0% at 100-200 pg/mL, 93.6% at 200-300 pg/mL, 87.3% at 300-500 pg/mL, 83.7% at 500-1000 pg/mL, and 70.2% at >1000 pg/mL. The 1-year survival rate was significantly low at BNP >300 pg/mL

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Estimated cubic spline transformation of the relationship between BNP levels and the adjusted hazard ratio. The reference BNP for this plot (with HR fixed as 1.0) was <50 pg/mL. The hazard ratio of 1-year mortality was adjusted for age, gender, dialysis vintage, and primary diseases. Dotted lines are 95% confidence limits

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the relationship between BNP levels and 1-year mortality. The area under the curve was 0.69 and the cut-off value was 299.2 pg/mL

Full size image
Table 6 HR for 1-year mortality of BNP levels adjusted for basal factors, Kt/V and nutrition factors
Full size table
Table 7 HR for 1-year mortality of BNP levels adjusted for basal correcting factors, Kt/V and transthyretin
Full size table

Table 8 shows correlation coefficients and P values for BNP and each parameter. BNP levels correlated with age, BMI, albumin levels, total cholesterol levels, Kt/V, nPCR, %CGR, and transthyretin levels. BNP levels showed the strongest correlation with transthyretin levels.

Table 8 Correlation coefficients and p value for BNP and the studied parameter
Full size table

Discussion

The Japanese Society for Dialysis Treatment (JSDT) investigated several indices related to 1-year mortality in patients after adjustments for basal confounding factors, including gender, age, hemodialysis vintage, and primary disease; dialysis prescription factors, such as Kt/V; and nutritional factors, including nPCR, albumin levels, total cholesterol levels, BMI, and %CGR [3]. BNP levels were not included in these indices. In the present study, we used the JSDT method to analyze HR for 1-year mortality at different BNP levels. We concluded that a BNP level higher than 500 pg/mL is a significantly high-risk factor for 1-year mortality.

The present study confirmed previous findings showing that BNP levels are a predictor of mortality in hemodialysis patients [4,5,6]. Naganuma et al. reported that a BNP level less than 200 pg/mL was associated with a good prognosis after a 3-year follow-up [7], whereas Biasioli et al. showed that a BNP level less than 335 pg/mL was associated with a good prognosis after a 28-month follow-up [8]. Zoccali et al. identified a BNP level higher than 125 pg/mL as a significantly high-risk factor after a 26-month follow-up [9, 10]. Our follow-up period of 1 year was the shortest, while the number of factors used for adjustments was the largest. A shorter follow-up period is suitable for evaluating BNP levels as a tool for risk stratification and treatment guidance. BNP levels need to be maintained at lower than 500 pg/mL as a daily management goal.

The risk associated with a BNP level ≥ 500 pg/mL was canceled after adjustments for nutritional factors. Therefore, a relationship appears to exist between high BNP levels and the nutritional status. The presence of chronic heart failure with ongoing weight loss or a low BMI is a predictor of muscle mass loss, a decline in exercise capacity, and a poor prognosis [11]. A syndrome involving weight loss, general fatigue, fat loss, and muscle wasting with chronic disease was recently recognized as cachexia. Cachexia is a prevalent and important pathological condition associated with chronic heart failure. It reduces survival independently of the heart failure function class and ejection [12, 13]. BNP levels play a major role in salt and water homeostasis, protecting the cardiovascular system from the effects of volume overload and cardiac comorbidities. In the bioimpedance method, BNP levels reflect individual variations in the hydration status of hemodialysis patients [14]. A value of 500 pg/mL has been used to differentiate between hemodialysis patients with or without volume overload [15, 16]. The extracellular water content to intracellular water content ratio increases as BMI decreases. A strong negative correlation was previously reported between excess fluid mass and BMI [17]. Patients with BNP levels higher than 500 pg/mL were overhydrated and weight loss from malnutrition resulted in additional fluid excess. On the other hand, even though BNP levels were high, good nutrition, and weight gain reduced volume overload. Chronic overhydration is an independent predictor of mortality in hemodialysis patients [18]. The risk associated with a high BNP level depends on the nutritional status. The combination of a high BNP level with a poor nutritional status needs to be treated not only by cardiological therapy, but also nutritional support. Despite the accepted importance of the influence of nutritional factors on the severity of cardiovascular disease, limited information is currently available on dietary intake and heart failure. Furthermore, existing nutritional interventions for heart failure were mostly pilot studies with small sample sizes and short follow-ups [19]. The findings of 17 randomized controlled trials indicated that education on nutritional interventions had positive effects on the clinical outcomes of patients; however, they all involved sodium and fluid restrictions [20]. After the administration of a high-caloric (600 kcal), high-protein (20 g), and oral nutritional supplement for 6 weeks to cachexic heart failure patients, significant improvements were observed in the quality of life, 6-m walking test, and tumor necrosis factor-α without the significant recovery of peak VO2 or the left ventricular ejection fraction; BNP was not measured in that study [21]. After the administration of 500 mL/day of enteral nutrition for 3 months to elderly heart failure patients, marked improvements were noted in BNP, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, and C-reactive protein levels [22].

After adjustments for transthyretin levels, the risk associated with BNP ≥ 500 pg/mL was no longer significant. Transthyretin is an important indicator of not only the nutritional status, but also the survival of hemodialysis patients after adjustments for age, gender, race, hemodialysis vintage, the diabetic state, and nutritional markers, including serum albumin levels [22, 23]. A recent study reported that serum transthyretin levels correlated with body fat mass [24]. The half-life of transthyretin is 2–3 days, which is shorter than that of serum albumin. A decline in serum transthyretin levels by 10 g/dL over 6 months is a robust predictor of increased mortality [25, 26]. The present results showed that a transthyretin level of less than 20 mg/dL was a high-risk factor. In hemodialysis patients, the combination of a BNP level ≥ 500 pg/mL and transthyretin level < 20 mg/dL, which is a decrease of more than 10 mg, warrants urgent treatment.

Conclusions

In dialysis patients, a BNP level ≥ 500 pg/mL is a significantly high-risk factor for 1-year mortality. The risk associated with a high BNP level is canceled out after adjustments for nutritional factors. Therefore, a relationship appears to exist between high BNP levels and the nutritional status. Efforts are needed to maintain a BNP level of less than 500 pg/mL and improve nutritional factors. The risk associated with a BNP level ≥ 500 pg/mL also depends on transthyretin levels, which need to be maintained at > 20 mg/dL.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this manuscript.

Abbreviations

%CGR:

Percent creatinine generation rate

BMI:

Body mass index

BNP:

Brain natriuretic peptide

CGN:

Chronic glomerulonephritis

DN:

Diabetic nephropathy

nPCR:

Normalized protein catabolic rate

References

  1. McCullough PA, Nowak RM, McCord J, Hollander JE, Herrmann HC, Steg PG, et al. B-type natriuretic peptide and clinical judgment in emergency diagnosis of heart failure: analysis from breathing not properly (BNP) multinational study. Circulation. 2002;106:416–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hirakata H, Nitta K, Inaba M, Shoji T, Fujii H, Kobayashi S, et al. Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy guidelines for management of cardiovascular diseases in patients on chronic hemodialysis. Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis: official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy. 2012;16:387–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. https://member.jsdt.or.jp/member/contents/cdrom/2009/FILE/zusetsu.html. Accessed 15 September 2019.

  4. Wang AY, Lai KN. Use of cardiac biomarkers in end-stage renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;19:1643–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Teranishi M, Hirata Y, Miyashita K, Suzuki M, Ishii K, Goto A, et al. Significance of plasma brain and atrial natriuretic peptides as long-term survival predictors in hemodialysis patients-13-year follow up study. Journal of Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy. 2006;39:1467–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hashimoto K, Ishiguro M, Ikutaka T, Yasue Y, Ohkuma T, Torisawa M, et al. Can plasma BNP serve as a factor predicting cardiovascular events in hemodialyzed patients. Journal of Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy. 1997;30:117–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Naganuma T, Sugimura K, Wada S, Yasumoto R, Sugimura T, Masuda C, et al. The prognostic role of brain natriuretic peptides in hemodialysis patients. Am J Nephrol. 2002;22:437–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Biasioli S, Zamperetti M, Borin D, Guidi G, De Fanti E, Schiavon R. Significance of plasma B-type natriuretic peptide in hemodialysis patients: blood sample timing and comorbidity burden. ASAIO J. 2007;53:587–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mallamaci F, Zoccali C, Tripepi G, Benedetto FA, Parlongo S, Cataliotti A, et al. Diagnostic potential of cardiac natriuretic peptides in dialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2001;59:1559–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zoccali C, Mallamaci F, Benedetto FA, Tripepi G, Parlongo S, Cataliotti A, et al. Cardiac natriuretic peptides are related to left ventricular mass and function and predict mortality in dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001;12:1508–15.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Evans WJ, Morley JE, Argiles J, Bales C, Baracos V, Guttridge D, et al. Cachexia: a new definition. Clin Nutr. 2008;27:793–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Anker SD, Swan JW, Volterrani M, Chua TP, Clark AL, Poole-Wilson PA, et al. The influence of muscle mass, strength, fatigability and blood flow on exercise capacity in cachectic and non-cachectic patients with chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 1997;18:259–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Okoshi MP, Capalbo RV, Romeiro FG, Okoshi K. Cardiac cachexia: perspectives for prevention and treatment. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017;108:74–80.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stenberg J, Melin J, Linberg M, Furuland H. Brain natriuretic peptide reflects individual variation in hydration status in hemodialysis patients. Hemodial Int. 2019;23:402–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee SW, Song JH, Kim GA, Lim HJ, Kim M-J. Plasma brain natriuretic peptide concentration on assessment of hydration status in hemodialysis patient. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;41:1257–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tapolyai M, Faludi M, Réti V, Lengvárszky Z, Szarvas T, Fülöp T, et al. Volume estimation in dialysis patients: the concordance of brain-type natriuretic peptide measurements and bioimpedance values. Hemodial Int. 2013;17:406–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ohashi Y, Saito A, Yamazaki K, Tai R, Matsukiyo T, Aikawa A, et al. Brain natriuretic peptide and body fluid composition in patients with chronic kidney disease: a cross-sectional study to evaluate the relationship between volume overload and malnutrition. Cardiorenal Med. 2016;6:337–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zoccali C, Moissl U, Chazot C, Mallamaci F, Tripepi G, Arkossy O, et al. Chronic fluid overload and mortality in ESRD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28:2491–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kerley CP. Nutritional interventions in heart failure: challenges and opportunities: current heart failure reports. 2018;15:131-140.

  20. Abshire M, Xu J, Baptiste D, Almansa JR, Xu J, Cummings A, et al. Nutritional intervention in heart failure: a systematic review of the literature. J Card Fail. 2015;21:989–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rozentryt P, von Haehling S, Lainscak M, Nowak JU, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Polonski L, et al. The effects of a high-caloric protein-rich oral nutritional supplement in patients with chronic heart failure and cachexia on quality of life, body composition, and inflammation markers: a randomized, double-blind pilot study. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2010;1:35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou H, Qian H. Relationship between enteral nutrition and serum levels of inflammatory factors and cardiac function in elderly patients with heart failure. Clin Interv Aging. 2018;13:397–401.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mittman N, Avram MM, Oo KK, Chattopadhyay J. Serum prealbumin predicts survival in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: 10 years of prospective observation. Am J Kidney Dis. 2001;38:1358–64.23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chertow GM, Ackert K, Lew NL, Lazarus JM, Lowrie EG. Prealbumin is as important as albumin in the nutritional assessment of hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2000;58:2512–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Matsuura S, Shirai Y, Kubo M, Nayama C, Okitsu M, Oiwa Y, et al. Body fat mass is correlated with serum transthyretin levels in maintenance hemodialysis patients. J Med Invest. 2017;64:222–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rambod M, Kovesdy CP, Bross R, Kopple JD, Kalantar-Zadeh K. Association of serum prealbumin and its changes over time with clinical outcomes and survival in patients receiving hemodialysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008;88:1485–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Funding for this study was not provided by any person or institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kenwakai Hospital, 1936 Kanaenakadaira, Iida, Nagano, 395-0801, Japan

    Etsuko Kumagai & Kazuhiro Furumachi

  2. Department of Innovative Medicine, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigakucho, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-8686, Japan

    Etsuko Kumagai & Shinji Takai

  3. Education and Research Center for Clinical Pharmacy, Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 4-20-1 Nasahara, Takatsuki, Osaka, 569-1094, Japan

    Keiko Hosohata

Authors
  1. Etsuko Kumagai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Keiko Hosohata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kazuhiro Furumachi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shinji Takai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

EK wrote the manuscript and KH revised it. EK contributed to the research concept and study design. KF contributed to data acquisition, the risk of bias assessment, data analysis/interpretation, and statistical analyses. ST contributed to data interpretation. EK contributed to supervision and mentorship. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Etsuko Kumagai.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the research Ethics Committee of Kenwakai Hospital (No.2019008).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumagai, E., Hosohata, K., Furumachi, K. et al. Range of plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels in hemodialysis patients at a high risk of 1-year mortality and their relationship with the nutritional status: a retrospective cohort study in one institute. Ren Replace Ther 6, 32 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41100-020-00280-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41100-020-00280-1

Keywords

Renal Replacement Therapy

ISSN: 2059-1381

Contact us