Skip to main content

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as risk factors for mortality in Peruvian adults with chronic kidney disease



To assess the association between the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) with all-cause mortality in Peruvian patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) attending a tertiary hospital.


We conducted a retrospective cohort study in adults with CKD in stages 1–5. The outcome variable was mortality and as variables of exposure to NLR and PLR. Both ratios were categorized as high with a cutoff point of 3.5 and 232.5, respectively. We carried out a Cox regression model and calculated crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with their 95% confidence interval (95% CI).


We analyzed 343 participants with a mean age of 78.3 (± 11.9) years and 62.9% (n = 216) men. The median follow-up time was 2.45 years (2.08–3.08), and the frequency of deaths was 17.5% (n = 60). The mortality of patients with high NLR was 28% compared to 15.7% of the group with normal NLR, and the mortality was 35.7% in those with high PLR and 15.6% in those with normal PLR. In the crude analysis, the high NLR and PLR were significantly associated with all-cause mortality (HR = 2.01; 95% CI 1.11–3.66) and (HR = 2.58; 95% CI 1.31–5.20). In the multivariate model, after adjusting for age, sex, serum creatinine, albumin and hemoglobin, the high NLR and PLR remained as independent risk factors for all-cause mortality (aHR = 1.97; 95% CI 1.05–3.69) and (aHR = 2.62; 95% CI 1.25–5.51), respectively.


Our study suggests the relationship between high NLR and PLR with all-cause mortality in patients with CKD.


Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is defined as the presence as abnormalities of kidney structure or function, present for more than 3 months, with implications for health [1]. Currently, stakeholders recognized CKD as a severe public health problem related to deterioration in the quality of life and high costs for the health system [2]. Patients with CKD have a lower life expectancy and a higher rate of cardiovascular complications, as well as anemia, bone disease, infections and cancer [3]. According to Global Burden of Disease, globally, in 2017, 1–2 million people died from CKD, and the global all-age mortality rate from CKD increased 41·5% between 1990 and 2017 [4]. In Peru, for the period 2010–2016, the prevalence of CKD increased by 300%, and although the standardized mortality rate decreased by 10% it is still high for a country with limited economic resources [5]. Due to the high burden of the disease, it is essential to know the factors associated with higher mortality.

Although there are different factors associated with mortality in patients with CKD, there is interest in searching for new markers. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are markers of chronic inflammation. These markers are obtained easily from the quotient between neutrophil and lymphocyte or platelet and lymphocyte blood counts, respectively [6,7,8]. Neutrophils are effector cells of the immune system, which rise in inflammation and generate an increase in oxidative stress [9]. Similarly, platelets have immunomodulatory properties, which lead to inflammation, thrombosis and cancer [10, 11]. Indeed, the contribution of interactions between neutrophils and platelets in infections and inflammatory processes have begun to be intensively studied [12, 13].

Specific lymphocyte subtypes, such as Th2 and regulatory T, decrease inflammation by different routes, such as GATA3 and FOXP3 [14]. Therefore, the elevation of the NLR and PLR reflects a pro-inflammatory imbalance, as the effector cells are increased and the regulatory cells are decreased. In CKD, the oxidative stress, an increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines (PCR, IL-6, TNF-a) and the poor nutritional status caused by this imbalance contribute to the progression of disease [15].

The NLR and PLR have proven to be a marker of mortality and complications in pathologies such as heart failure, peptic ulcer perforation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, rheumatic diseases, neoplasms and others [16,17,18]. In patients with CKD, the NLR and PLR predict disease progression and the presence of albuminuria [19, 20]. Although several studies have suggested that both markers also predict mortality in patients with CKD, there are contradictory results [21], they are studies done in dialysis patients [22, 23], or patients with CKD in stages 1–5, but in Asian population [24]. Because mortality and associated factors differ according to the stage of the disease in Hispanic population [25,26,27], this study aims to assess the association between NLR and PLR with all-cause mortality in Peruvian patients with CKD who were attending tertiary hospital.

Materials and methods

Population and study design

We conducted a retrospective, analytical and observational cohort study in a population consisted in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with stages 1–5 from the Hospital Edgardo Rebagliati Martins (EsSalud) in Lima, Peru. The inclusion criteria were as follows: Patient with CKD who enters the “Surveillance system of the Chronic Kidney Disease Management Unit” (SSCKD) between 2016 and 2018 and patient with complete blood count at the start of follow-up. The SSCKD is a program of the Renal Health Unit of the Nephrology Department of the Edgardo Rebagliati Martins Hospital, made up of a multidisciplinary team made up of a nephrologist, a nurse and a nutritionist for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with CKD derived from the services of primary care of the Healthcare Network of the hospital. Primary care physicians screened CKD (GFR calculated by Modification Dialysis formula Renal Disease 4—MDRD4—and albumin/creatinine ratio in random urine) in patients with risk factors: diabetes, arterial hypertension and/or > 55 years in their respective care centers. Patients diagnosed with CKD stages 3, 4 and 5 (calculated GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) were referrals for specialty care.The creatinine was repeated, and GFR was calculated using the MDR4 formula to corroborate the diagnosis of CKD in the outpatient nephrology clinic. The exclusion criteria were patients with CKD stage 5 in dialysis and patient with a history of renal transplantation.

Sample and statistical power calculation

We conducted a census for the collection of participants in the established study period. The total sample of our study was 343 participants. For the statistical power calculation, we used the study by Tatar et al., who evaluated the association between high NLR and mortality in elderly patients with CKD stages 3–5. In this study, the survival reported in the Kaplan–Meier curves at 60 months after enrollment by the outpatient clinic in the group with increased NLR was 50.5%, while in the group with normal NLR, it was 85.6%. We carried out the calculations using a 95% confidence interval (CI) and obtained a statistical power of 99%


The exposure variables were the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), defined as the quotient between neutrophil or platelet count and lymphocyte count. We defined high or normal NLR and PLR using a cutoff point of 3.5 and 232.5, respectively [14]. The primary outcome was mortality, a dependent variable composed of the probability of dying and the time until the development of the event in the follow-up. We used all-cause mortality, defined as deaths from all causes in our sample in the study’s follow-up period. The start of the follow-up time was admission to SSCKD, and the end of follow-up was the date of death or the end of follow-up, as appropriate. Other variables of interest included age (years), sex, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (ml/min/1.73 m2), CKD stage (stratified into three groups: initial stages (1 and 2), intermediate stages (3a and 3b) and advanced stages (4 and 5), laboratory test and comorbidities such as diabetes and hypertension, diagnosed by your primary care physician.

Data collection procedure

We obtained a list of patients who entered the SSCKD during the 2016–2018 period to collect the data. The SSCKD was created for patients referred from primary care centers attached to the hospital. In the healthcare centers, the physician performed the CKD screening estimating the GFR using the modification dialysis renal disease 4 (MDRD4) formula and the albumin/creatinine ratio in urine at random. Then, physicians referred patients with an estimated GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 for care with the nephrologist. In the first visit, the nephrologist repeated creatinine and other laboratory data were requested.

Subsequently, we reviewed the laboratory results requested by the nephrologist for the patient's admission to the database, using the software called “RESULAB.” We collected serum creatinine (mg/dL), glucose (mg/dL), total protein (g/dL), albumin (g/dL), glutamic pyruvic transaminases (U/L), glutamic oxaloacetic transaminases (U/L), total bilirubin (mg/dL), alkaline phosphatase(U/L), globulin (g/dL), hemoglobin (g/dL), platelets (K/uL), neutrophils (K/uL) and lymphocytes (K/uL). We determined the vital status and date of death through the consultation of the National Registry of Identification and Civil Status Web site (

For non-survivors patients, we collected the date of death for any cause to establish the time until the event. For those patients who did not die during the established period, the closure of the follow-up was on October 31, 2019. We marked the beginning of the follow-up by the patient's admission to the SSCKD.

Statistical analysis

We summarize measures for the numerical and categorical variables. If the data distribution was symmetric, we showed the variables as means with standard deviation or, failing that, as medians with interquartile range. We calculated the mortality rate as the number of deaths per 100 person-years of follow-up at risk.

We applied the Student's t test to compare numerical variables with symmetrical distributions. If the distributions were asymmetrical, we used the Mann–Whitney U test. The chi-square test was carried out to compare categorical variables. We used the Kaplan–Meier method and the log-rank test to compare survival functions. Next, we calculated the crude and adjusted Cox regression model or the proportional hazards model to contrast the study hypothesis. We calculated crude and adjusted hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). We entered the confounding variables into the adjusted model with p < 0.05 in the crude analysis.

Additionally, we carried out a sensitivity analysis using the best cutoff points of NLR and PLR for mortality. For all this, we calculated the cutoff point for NLR and PRL using the area under the curve and the Youden’s index. Next, the 95% CI of both cutoff points was obtained using bootstrap with thousand repetitions. Subsequently, we carried out a multivariate Cox regression for both exposure variables defined with those cutoff points. Finally, we verified compliance with the assumption of hazard proportionality in all Cox regression models. All analyses were performed with the STATA statistical package version 17.0.


We reviewed 356 clinical records from patients with CKD who entered SSCKD between 2016 and 2018. We excluded 12 patients because they did not have complete laboratory tests and did not present a death date. Finally, we included 343 patients in the analysis. The mean age was 78.3 (± 11.9) years, and the median follow-up time was 2.45 years (2.08–3.08). In the population studied, the predominant gender was male, with 62.9% (n = 216). Regarding comorbidities, 64.7% were hypertension, while 30% had diabetes mellitus. On the other hand, the average of eGFR was 47.4 (± 10.5) ml/min/1.73 m2 and the CKD stage included 22 (6.4%) patients in stages 1–2, 311 (90.7%) patients in stages 3a–3b and 10 (2.9%) patients in stages 4–5. Demographic and laboratory characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Clinical–epidemiological characteristics of the population with CKD according to the NLR level

Regarding the exposure’s variables, 14.6% (n = 50) had high NLR and 8.2% (n = 28) high PLR. In total, 17.5% (n = 60) died at the end of follow-up. Participants with high NLR had elevated serum levels of alkaline phosphatase (114 vs 100 U/L; p = 0.03) and platelets (260 vs 234 K/uL; p < 0.01) than participants with normal NLR (Table 1). Participants with high PLR had a lower average age (72.6 vs 78.8 years; p < 0.01), glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (19 vs 23 U/L; p = 0.02) and hemoglobin (11.2 vs 12.2 g/dL; p < 0.01) compared to participants with normal PLR. In contrast, participants with high PLR had elevated serum levels of neutrophils (4.5 vs 3.9 K/uL; p = 0.03) (Table 2).

Table 2 Clinical–epidemiological characteristics of the population with CKD according to the PLR level

The mortality of patients with high NLR was 28% compared to 15.7% of the group with normal NLR (p = 0.03). Likewise, mortality was 35.7% in those with high PLR and 15.6% in those with normal PLR (p = 0.01). The mortality rate in the group with high NLR was 12.5 deaths per 100 person-years of follow-up, while in the group with high PLR, it was 16 deaths per 100 person-years of follow-up. Kaplan–Meier curves showed a statistically significantly worse survival function for participants with high NLR and PLR at the end of follow-up (Figs. 1 and 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Kaplan–Meier curves of the survival function according to levels of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio

Fig. 2
figure 2

Kaplan–Meier curves of the survival function according to levels of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio

Mean age was higher in the group of the dead (81.9 vs 77.5 years; p < 0.01), and there was more mortality in males (21.3% vs 11%; p = 0.01). The most advanced stages of chronic kidney disease had higher mortality, 9.1%, 16.4% and 70%, respectively. In the laboratory profile, creatinine levels were higher in the dead group (1.4 vs 1.6 mg/dL; p < 0.01). On the other hand, both hemoglobin (11.7 vs. 12.3 g/dL; p = 0.03) and albumin (4.0 vs. 4.2 mg/dL; p < 0.01) had lower values in the dead group (Table 3).

Table 3 Clinical–epidemiological characteristics of the population with CKD according to the vital status

In the crude model, the high NLR was significantly associated with all-cause mortality (HR = 2.01; 95% CI 1.11–3.66). Likewise, the high PLR was significantly associated with all-cause mortality (HR = 2.58; 95% CI 1.31–5.20) (Table 4).

Table 4 Cox regression analysis for the association between high leukocyte ratios and all-cause mortality in the study population

In the multivariate model, after adjusting for age, sex, serum creatinine, chronic kidney disease stage, albumin and hemoglobin, the high NLR and PLR remained as independent risk factors for all-cause mortality (aHR = 1.97; 95% CI 1.05–3.69) and (aHR = 2.62; 95% CI 1.25–5.51), respectively (Table 4).

In the sensitivity analysis of our data, the best cutoff point that defines mortality for NLR was 2.3 (95% CI 1.24–3.41), while for PLR, it was 220.7 (95% CI 139.2–302.1). There is an association between mortality and leukocyte ratios with both cutoff points. With the NLR cutoff point, we report an aHR = 2.07; 95% CI 1.21–3.54, and with the PLR, we report an aHR = 3.09; 95% CI 1.55–6.16.


The present study suggests the relationship between high NLR and PLR with all-cause mortality in patients with CKD. Thus, patients with a high NLR or PLR showed twice the risk of dying compared to those who had these ratios within normal limits. Our results are similar to a study conducted in 350 Japanese patients with CKD in stages 1–4, in which a high NLR was associated with a higher probability of requiring dialysis and death [15]. Likewise, they are similar to a study done in 165 Turkish patients with CKD in stages 1–3 that found that a high NLR was associated with higher mortality from all causes [21]. In contrast, Chinese patients with CKD in stages 1–4 did not find an association between NLR and cardiovascular mortality or of any cause [20]. Methodological differences can explain these discrepancies. Although the study included a more significant number of patients (938) and was multicenter, it also had a smaller number of diabetic patients (23.8%) compared to the Japanese (37%), Turkish (41.4%) or in our study (30%), and could explain these differences, due to the higher mortality in diabetic patients [28]. Similarly, the mean age of the Chinese patients was comparatively lower (52.8) than that of the patients in the Japanese (68), Turkish (73.8) and our studies (78.3), which is essential because older age is associated with higher mortality in CKD [29].

The association of NLR and survival is justified in that it is a marker of inflammation that predicts complications and mortality in patients with chronic diseases. This biomarker indicates an imbalance between effector cells (neutrophils), which reflect oxidative stress and regulatory cells (lymphocytes), which decrease the pro-inflammatory state [30]. This relationship between neutrophil count and lymphocyte count is a new measure of inflammation in different diseases with systemic inflammation such as CKD [31]. Uncontrolled inflammation causes glomerular, tubular and interstitial damage that leads to renal hemodynamic imbalance and failure to control blood pressure [30].

Regarding PLR and mortality, we have similar findings to a study in patients with rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis in which both NLR and PRL were associated with mortality [32]. However, a Turkish study does not found association between PRL and mortality or the need of dialysis, but the PRL group that died has a mean of 112 ± 267, while in our study a high PLR was considered as cutoff > 232.5 [21]. In that sense, another study found that relationship between PRL and mortality is not a linear relationship and that it can follow a curve in J-shaped that differs according to ethnicity (PLR ≥ 83.18) and albumin (PLR ≥ 113.89)(42). It is likely that, as with NLR, systemic inflammation may play a fundamental role. An increase in platelets or an increase in lymphocytes is typical to find in patients with inflammatory states [33]. Platelet release can be modulated by inflammatory cytokines as a mechanism for rapid recovery, while decreased lymphocytes may be due to increased lymphocyte apoptosis and suppressed lymphocyte production caused by high cortisol levels in response to inflammation [33, 34]. However, it is necessary to emphasize that PLR and NLR are not stable markers of the inflammatory status and depend on when they are measured. Its values vary if the patient has a state of acute inflammation that affects the values of neutrophils/platelets and lymphocytes.

Although the association between NLR, PLR and mortality may be related to more significant inflammation, CKD progression would also be mediated because there is higher mortality in the advanced stages of the disease [34]. However, after sensitivity analysis, removing stage 4 and 5 participants, lymphocyte ratios remained as an independent risk marker for mortality. This finding could suppose other additional routes to the progression of the disease to explain this association in our population. Moreover, several studies reported NLR and PLR associated with albuminuria (regardless of GFR) and a decrease in GFR [19, 35]. So, this finding becomes relevant due to the association between albuminuria, CKD progression and mortality [32, 33].

Our study has limitations. First, being a retrospective study, the data obtained could have deficiencies in its registration. Second, there is the possible inclusion of patients with subclinical inflammatory and infectious diseases, which are not registered in the SSCKD or RESULAB database. Third, no other possible factors that could potentially influence mortality, such as nutritional status, albuminuria, cardiovascular disease, obesity, smoking and acute renal injury, have been evaluated. Fourth, by the design of our study, we can only assume that lymphocyte ratios are biomarkers of risk and not of causality. Fifth, our database does not include specific causes of death, nor did they identify the source of subclinical inflammation or other confusers as hypertension or diabetes, liver and lung diseases, malignancy and lifestyle factors such as smoking and chronic alcohol consumption, obesity or socioeconomic status. Sixth, any possible condition of acute inflammation in the patients that could affect the PLR and NLR values was not evaluated. Seventh, although we used the classification of CKD according to the GFR, albuminuria was not included, which was not available at the time of the evaluation. Eighth, we could not exclude some acute diseases that can affect PLN and NLR values. Finally, the measurement of the ratios has only been carried out at the beginning of the follow-up; therefore, we do not evaluate variations in time and influence on the mortality.

In conclusion, our study suggests the relationship between high NLR and PLR with all-cause mortality in patients with CKD. The patients with a high NLR or PLR showed twice the risk of dying compared to those who had these ratios within normal limits. These ratios are constructed with values usually collected in hemograms commonly used for patient follow-up. Being constructed based on a cheap and common examination and, due to our results, we believe that it could be considered within the usual practice in resource countries limited.

Availability of data and material

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio


Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio


Chronic kidney disease


Hazard ratio


Confidence interval


Chronic Kidney Disease Management Unit


Modification dialysis renal disease 4


  1. Levin A, Stevens PE, Bilous RW, Coresh J, De Francisco ALM, De Jong PE, et al. Kidney disease: Improving global outcomes (KDIGO) CKD work group. KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 2013;3(1):1–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Levin A, Tonelli M, Bonventre J, Coresh J, Donner JA, Fogo AB, et al. Global kidney health 2017 and beyond: a roadmap for closing gaps in care, research, and policy. Lancet. 2017;390(10105):1888–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Webster AC, Nagler EV, Morton RL, Masson P. Chronic kidney disease. Lancet. 2017;389(10075):1238–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bikbov B, Purcell CA, Levey AS, Smith M, Abdoli A, Abebe M, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2020;395(10225):709–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Atamari-Anahui N, Ccorahua-Rios MS, Condori-Huaraka M, Huamanvilca-Yepez Y, Amaya E, Herrera-Añazco P. Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease in Peru and its relation to social determinants of health. Int Health. 2020;12(4):264–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fei Y, Wang X, Zhang H, Huang M, Chen X, Zhang C. Reference intervals of systemic immune-inflammation index, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, platelet to lymphocyte ratio, mean platelet volume to platelet ratio, mean platelet volume and red blood cell distribution width-standard deviation in healthy Han adults in Wuhan region in central China. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2020;80(6):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Mukanova U, Yessirkepov M, Kitas GD. The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as an inflammatory marker in rheumatic diseases. Ann Lab Med. 2019;39(4):345–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kurtul A, Ornek E. Platelet to lymphocyte ratio in cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review. Angiology. 2019;70(9):802–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kotani K, Sakane N. White blood cells, neutrophils, and reactive oxygen 4metabolites among asymptomatic subjects. Int J Prev Med. 2012;3(6):428–31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Nicolai L, Schiefelbein K, Lipsky S, Leunig A, Hoffknecht M, Pekayvaz K, et al. Vascular surveillance by haptotactic blood platelets in inflammation and infection. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5778.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Saito R, Shoda K, Maruyama S, Yamamoto A, Takiguchi K, Furuya S, et al. Platelets enhance malignant behaviours of gastric cancer cells via direct contacts. Br J Cancer. 2020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Portier I, Campbell RA. Role of platelets in detection and regulation of infection. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Warren E, Teskey G, Venketaraman V. Effector Mechanisms of Neutrophils within the Innate Immune System in response to mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection. J Clin Med. 2017;6(2):15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Valga F, Monzón T, Henriquez F, Antón-Pérez G. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios as biological markers of interest in kidney disease. Nefrologia. 2019;39(3):243–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoshitomi R, Nakayama M, Sakoh T, Fukui A, Katafuchi E, Seki M, et al. High neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio is associated with poor renal outcomes in Japanese patients with chronic kidney disease. Ren Fail. 2019;41(1):238–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Seropian IM, Romeo FJ, Pizarro R, Vulcano NO, Posatini RA, Marenchino RG, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as predictors of survival after heart transplantation. ESC Hear Fail. 2018;5(1):149–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zheng J, Cai J, Li H, Zeng K, He L, Fu H, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio as prognostic predictors for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with various treatments: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;44(3):967–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Aydin O, Pehlivanll F. Is the platelet to lymphocyte ratio a potential biomarker for predicting mortality in peptic ulcer perforation? Surg Infect. 2019;20(4):326–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sevencan NO, Ozkan AE. Associations between neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, platelet/lymphocyte ratio, albuminuria and uric acid and the estimated glomerular filtration rate in hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease stages 1–3. Arch Med Sci. 2019;15(5):1232–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yuan Q, Wang J, Peng Z, Zhou Q, Xiao X, Xie Y, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and incident end-stage renal disease in Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease: Results from the Chinese cohort study of chronic kidney disease (C-STRIDE). J Transl Med. 2019;17(1):86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tatar E, Mirili C, Isikyakar T, Yaprak M, Guvercin G, Ozay E, et al. The association of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and platelet/lymphocyte ratio with clinical outcomes in geriatric patients with stage 3–5 chronic kidney disease. Acta Clin Belgica Int J Clin Lab Med. 2016;71(4):221–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Catabay C, Obi Y, Streja E, Soohoo M, Park C, Rhee CM, et al. Lymphocyte cell ratios and mortality among incident hemodialysis patients. Am J Nephrol. 2017;46(5):408–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lu X, Wang S, Zhang G, Xiong R, Li H. High neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is a significant predictor of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2018;43(2):490–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sato H, Takeuchi Y, Matsuda K, Kagaya S, Saito A, Fukami H, et al. Pre-dialysis neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, a novel and strong short-term predictor of all-cause mortality in patients with diabetic nephropathy: results from a single-center study. Ther Apher Dial. 2017;21(4):370–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Neovius M, Jacobson SH, Eriksson JK, Elinder CG, Hylander B. Mortality in chronic kidney disease and renal replacement therapy: a population-based cohort study. BMJ Open. 2014;4(2):e004251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Peterson K, Anderson J, Boundy E, Ferguson L, McCleery E, Waldrip K. Mortality disparities in racial/ethnic minority groups in the veterans health administration: an evidence review and Map. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(3):e1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Desai N, Lora CM, Lash JP, Ricardo AC. CKD and ESRD in US hispanics. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019;73(1):102–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Branch M, German C, Bertoni A, Yeboah J. Incremental risk of cardiovascular disease and/or chronic kidney disease for future ASCVD and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: ACCORD trial. J Diab Complicat. 2019;33(7):468–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Moranne O, Fafin C, Roche S, Francois M, Allot V, Potier J, et al. Treatment plans and outcomes in elderly patients reaching advanced chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2018;33(12):2182–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Imig JD, Ryan MJ. Immune and inflammatory role in renal disease. Compr Physiol. 2013;3(2):957–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Okyay GU, Inal S, Öneç K, Er RE, Paşaoǧlu Ö, Paşaoǧlu H, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in evaluation of inflammation in patients with chronic kidney disease. Ren Fail. 2013;35(1):29–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Toraman A, Neşe N, Özyurt B, Kürşat S. Association between neutrophil-lymphocyte & platelet lymphocyte ratios with prognosis & mortality in rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis. Indian J Med Res. 2019;150(4):399–406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zeng M, Liu Y, Liu F, Peng Y, Sun L, Xiao L. J-shaped association of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio with 5-year mortality among patients with chronic kidney disease in a prospective cohort study. Int Urol Nephrol. 2020;52(10):1943–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cognasse F, Laradi S, Berthelot P, Bourlet T, Marotte H, Mismetti P, et al. Platelet inflammatory response to stress. Front Immunol. 2019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Akbas EM, Demirtas L, Ozcicek A, Timuroglu A, Bakirci EM, Hamur H, et al. Association of epicardial adipose tissue, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio with diabetic nephropathy. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7(7):1794–801.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors funded the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



GEUF, MVRF, PHA and VBZ contributed to study design and concept. GEUF and MVRF performed acquisition of data. GEUF, MVRF, PHA and VBZ drafted the manuscript. PHA and VBZ critically revised the manuscript and supervised the study. GEUF and MVRF performed the statistical analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vicente Aleixandre Benites-Zapata.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee at which the studies were conducted (Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas; PI130-19) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent for publication

All authors agree to the terms of the BioMed Central Copyright and License Agreement, which we strongly recommend you read and, where applicable, Open Data policy.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Umeres-Francia, G.E., Rojas-Fernández, M.V., Herrera-Añazco, P. et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as risk factors for mortality in Peruvian adults with chronic kidney disease. Ren Replace Ther 8, 30 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: