Skip to main content

Cholesterol embolization syndrome and intra-abdominal bleeding immediately after initiation of hemodialysis: a case report with literature review

Abstract

Background

Cholesterol embolization syndrome (CES) is a disease associating with the systemic cholesterol crystal embolism and end-organ dysfunction due to the atherosclerotic plaque rupture, which is dominantly triggered by the intravascular intervention. There is no consensus for which types of anticoagulants we should use during the hemodialysis in patients with CES and end-stage renal disease.

Case presentation

We had a 68-year-old man with CES due to intravascular intervention, who suffered the omental bleeding, instead of the embolism, immediately after the initiation of hemodialysis with heparinization. An emergent laparotomy found active bleeding from the omentum, which was surgically repaired. The histopathological analysis showed the embolization of cholesterol crystal clefts in the omentum artery and the injury of arterial wall structure accompanied by the infiltration of inflammatory cells. We preferred nafamostat mesylate during hemodialysis and he had no adverse events following the surgery.

Conclusions

It should be noticed that, in addition to the embolic events, bleeding events can develop in patients with CES, particularly following the initiation of hemodialysis with anticoagulation therapy.

Background

Cholesterol embolization syndrome (CES) is a disease associating with the systemic cholesterol crystal embolism due to the atherosclerotic plaque rupture, which is dominantly triggered by the intravascular intervention. The disease has poor clinical outcomes including severe dermopathy and end-organ dysfunction [1].

We experienced a patient with CES triggered by the intravascular interventions who suffered the omental bleeding, instead of the embolism, immediately after the introduction of hemodialysis. We might have to be careful of the bleeding comorbidities instead of embolism particularly while initiating hemodialysis in patients with CES.

Case presentation

On admission

A 68-year-old man with a history of hypertension and diabetes mellitus as well as cigarette smoking received coronary angiography for the surveillance before the intervention to the abdominal aortic aneurysm (Fig. 1a), which showed multiple advanced stenosis in the coronary arteries. Serum creatinine on admission was 2.0 mg/dL and computed tomography showed bilateral renal atrophy (Fig. 1b). Following the initiation of low-dose aspirin, he underwent coronary artery bypass grafting 2 weeks later and endovascular aneurysm repair 4 weeks later.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Computed tomography findings on admission. a The blue arrow indicates abdominal aortic aneurysm. The maximum diameter was 60 mm. b Bilateral renal atrophy. Renal cyst in the right kidney

Following these intravascular interventions, livedo reticularis and blue toe at bilateral foot developed (Fig. 2), accompanied by the increase in serum creatinine level (from 2.0 to 3.0 mg/dL) and eosinophilia (1300/μL). The skin biopsy obtained from his right toe did not show any findings of CES. Renal function further deteriorated (serum creatinine increased up to 8.2 mg/dL) as well as worsening of the above symptoms.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Skin lesions in his bilateral lower limb. The yellow arrows indicate blue toe and the red arrows indicate livedo reticularis

His body height was 168 cm and his body weight was 51.2 kg. White blood cell count was 8170/μL, eosinophil count was 610/μL, hemoglobin was 8.7 g/dL, platelet count was 14.6 × 104/μL, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was 133 mg/dL (Table 1).

Table 1 Laboratory data at the time of CES diagnosis

Initiation of hemodialysis

Given the clinical presentation, we diagnosed him as CES and initiated the steroid therapy with oral prednisolone 0.5 mg/kg/day and the intermittent hemodialysis (3 h per session and three times per week) with heparinization. We used unfractionated heparin at a standard procedure (1000 units bolus shot and 750 units/h continuous infusion). We did not monitor activated clotting time and activated partial thromboplastin time, but he experienced no device thrombosis and difficulty in hemostasis.

After initiation of hemodialysis

Five days following the initiation of hemodialysis, he presented acute abdominal pain and hemodynamic deterioration. Enhanced computed tomography showed active bleeding from the right gastroepiploic artery (Fig. 3). An emergent laparotomy found pulsatile active bleeding from the omentum with 3500 mL of hemoperitoneum, which was surgically repaired with an optimal result (Fig. 4a).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography obtained at the time of his abdominal pain (horizontal view [left] and coronal view [right]). The blue arrow indicates abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with stent grafting. The red arrow indicates the leakage of contrast medium from a branch of the right gastroepiploic artery. The yellow arrow indicates intra-abdominal bleeding

Fig. 4
figure 4

Pathological findings of the resected omentum. a The resected omentum with hemorrhage (black arrow). b Massive cholesterol crystal clefts occluding arterioles of the omentum. c Inflammatory cell infiltration to arterial wall (blue arrow) and rupture of arterial wall and transmural bleeding (yellow arrow)

The histopathological analysis showed the embolization of cholesterol crystal clefts in the cavity of the omentum artery (Fig. 4b) and the injury of arterial wall structure accompanied by the infiltration of inflammatory cells (Fig. 4c), which would be the cause of hemoperitoneum.

We preferred nafamostat mesylate during hemodialysis and he had no adverse events including bleeding following the surgery. Following the steroid therapy, eosinophilia improved immediately, and toe condition did not worsen. He remained dependent on the hemodialysis. He was expired 6 months later due to sepsis, which was considered no association with CES.

Discussion and conclusions

CES in this case

CES is a systemic disease of embolization of cholesterol crystal disseminated from the atherosclerotic plaque in the major artery [1]. The embolization causes both ischemia and inflammation including eosinophilia triggered by interleukin-5 secretion and multiple end-organ dysfunctions [2, 3].

The risk factors of CES are similar to those of conventional atherosclerosis, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, smoking history, and male sex, most of which our patient accompanied [4]. The existence of abdominal aneurysm and intravascular interventions would have triggered the development of CES in our patient [5, 6].

CES and end-stage renal failure

CES has a considerable negative impact on kidney function, which is called athero-embolic renal disease [7, 8]. Most of them develop within weeks following the intra-arterial intervention. There are various reports associating with the prognosis of renal function following CES: 28–61% of cases required hemodialysis and partial improvement in renal function were observed in 21–39% of cases [1, 9,10,11,12]. Baseline higher serum creatinine level is a risk factor of hemodialysis following CES. Of note, multiple renal insults are associated with refractoriness to the recovery of renal function [10]. The patient also had renal sclerosis before the development of CES.

Anticoagulation as a risk factor of CES

Traditionally, anticoagulation therapy has been considered a trigger of CES given that anticoagulation might destabilize the plaque [13]. However, recent studies demonstrated that anticoagulation therapy during catheter intervention or coronary artery grafting did not have any impacts in the development of CES [6, 14]. Given these evidences, the current consensus states that there is no definite association between anticoagulation therapy and CES [4]. Nevertheless, another recent study showed that the secession of anticoagulation improved CES [11]. And anticoagulation therapy is by convention not recommended for the patients with CES in the daily clinical practice thus far [4].

Anticoagulation therapy is essential for the successful hemodialysis. We summarize the possible anticoagulants that might be applicable in patients with CES in Table 2. As shown, there is no consensus for which types of anticoagulants we should use for the hemodialysis in patients with CES and renal failure thus far. In general hemodialysis, we use heparin for the anticoagulation therapy to maintain extracorporeal circulation, as we did in this case at first. Low-molecular weight heparin has no definite evidence in patients with CES. We did not prefer low-molecular weight heparin given its relatively longer half-life in blood. Instead, we used nafamostat mesylate, which in turn has a disadvantage in its high cost.

Table 2 Overview of possible anticoagulants for hemodialysis in patients with CES

For the patients with CES, some clinicians recommend peritoneal dialysis, which does not require any anticoagulation [15]. However, it is often not applicable given the frequent abdominal comorbidities including intestinal ischemia [16].

CES and bleeding

In patients with CES, cholesterol crystal emboli cause systemic end-organ dysfunction not only via microvascular obstruction but also via micro-vasculopathy. Consistently, the histopathological assessment showed cholesterol crystal embolization as well as infiltration of inflammatory cells and rupture of an omental artery. Cholesterol emboli would have caused vessel obstruction and inflammation, which resulted in the intra-abdominal bleeding.

There are few reports of bleeding events in patients with CES, except for a case of pulmonary bleeding [17] and another of intestinal bleeding accompanied by intestinal perforation [18]. We summarize the cases of CES that accompanied bleeding in Table 3. As shown, this is the first case of CES that accompanied intraperitoneal bleeding. In our case, heparin used during the hemodialysis might have worsened the severity of CES and caused intraperitoneal bleeding. We did not experience further bleeding events when nafamostat mesylate was used instead during the hemodialysis. Although there is no consensus thus far, we should be careful to select anticoagulants when patients with CES initiate hemodialysis. In conclusion, not only the embolic events, but also the bleeding events can develop in patients with CES, particularly following the initiation of hemodialysis with anticoagulation therapy.

Table 3 Literature review of CES patients with bleeding events

Availability of data and materials

All data and materials were included in the manuscript.

Abbreviations

CES:

Cholesterol embolization syndrome

References

  1. Fine MJ, Kapoor W, Falanga V. Cholesterol crystal embolization: a review of 221 cases in the English literature. Angiology. 1987;38:769–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kronzon I, Saric M. Cholesterol embolization syndrome. Circulation. 2010;122:631–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kasinath BS, Corwin HL, Bidani AK, Korbet SM, Schwartz MM, Lewis EJ. Eosinophilia in the diagnosis of atheroembolic renal disease. Am J Nephrol. 1987;7:173–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ozkok A. Cholesterol-embolization syndrome: current perspectives. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2019;15:209–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Carroccio A, Olin JW, Ellozy SH, Lookstein RA, Valenzuela R, Minor ME, et al. The role of aortic stent grafting in the treatment of atheromatous embolization syndrome: results after a mean of 15 months follow-up. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40:424–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fukumoto Y, Tsutsui H, Tsuchihashi M, Masumoto A, Takeshita A. The incidence and risk factors of cholesterol embolization syndrome, a complication of cardiac catheterization: a prospective study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:211–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Modi KS, Rao VK. Atheroembolic renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001;12:1781–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Scolari F, Ravani P. Atheroembolic renal disease. Lancet (London, England). 2010;375:1650–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lye WC, Cheah JS, Sinniah R. Renal cholesterol embolic disease. Case report and review of the literature. Am J Nephrol. 1993;13:489–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Thadhani RI, Camargo CA Jr, Xavier RJ, Fang LS, Bazari H. Atheroembolic renal failure after invasive procedures. Natural history based on 52 histologically proven cases. Medicine. 1995;74:350–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Belenfant X, Meyrier A, Jacquot C. Supportive treatment improves survival in multivisceral cholesterol crystal embolism. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999;33:840–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Scolari F, Ravani P, Gaggi R, Santostefano M, Rollino C, Stabellini N, et al. The challenge of diagnosing atheroembolic renal disease: clinical features and prognostic factors. Circulation. 2007;116:298–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hitti WA, Wali RK, Weinman EJ, Drachenberg C, Briglia A. Cholesterol embolization syndrome induced by thrombolytic therapy. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2008;8:27–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Blankenship JC, Butler M, Garbes A. Prospective assessment of cholesterol embolization in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic vs conservative therapy. Chest. 1995;107:662–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mizuno M, Ito Y, Hayasaki T, Suzuki Y, Hiramatsu H, Toda S, et al. A case of acute renal failure caused by cholesterol embolization after carotid artery stenting that was improved by peritoneal dialysis. Intern Med. 2011;50:1719–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gillerot G, Sempoux C, Pirson Y, Devuyst O. Which type of dialysis in patients with cholesterol crystal embolism? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002;17:156–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sabatine MS, Oelberg DA, Mark EJ, Kanarek D. Pulmonary cholesterol crystal embolization. Chest. 1997;112:1687–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Moolenaar W, Lamers CB. Gastrointestinal blood loss due to cholesterol crystal embolization. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1995;21:220–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The authors confirm that they received no funding for this report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KK, TK, YA, SM, AS, TK, and HY provided clinical discussion and treatment of the patient. KK, TK, and TI drafted the manuscript. KK reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teruhiko Imamura.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in this case were in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Helsinki Declaration.

Consent for publication

Informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kakeshita, K., Koike, T., Imamura, T. et al. Cholesterol embolization syndrome and intra-abdominal bleeding immediately after initiation of hemodialysis: a case report with literature review. Ren Replace Ther 6, 53 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41100-020-00305-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41100-020-00305-9

Keywords