Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Efficacy of polymethylmethacrylate membrane hemodiafilter Filtryzer® PMF™-21A in improving pruritus in hemodialysis patients: a prospective interventional study

Renal Replacement Therapy volume 9, Article number: 39 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Hemodialysis-associated pruritus (HAP) occurs in 60–80% of hemodialysis patients. This significant complication not only decreases quality of life through sleep disturbance and depression, but also leads to poor survival outcomes. The polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) membrane was the first synthetic polymer membrane for the hollow-fiber artificial kidney created in 1977. PMMA membrane dialyzers have been reported to be effective for improving various complaints, including pruritus, and nutritional status. In Japan, a PMMA membrane hemodiafilter Filtryzer® PMF™-A (PMF-A) was launched in November 2021 and subsequently became available for online hemodiafiltration (OHDF). This study aimed to determine whether PMF-A effectively improves pruritus in hemodialysis patients.

Methods

Participants were 20 patients (median age 74.5 years) on predilution OHDF (pre-OHDF) or postdilution OHDF (post-OHDF) using an Asymmetric Triacetate Membrane® hemodiafilter (FIX-210E eco or FIX-210S eco), who were experiencing pruritus of “very mild” or higher severity based on the Shiratori severity score either during the daytime or nighttime. After switching to post-OHDF with PMF-21A (substitution flow rate: 10 L/session), the substitution flow rate was gradually increased according to results of pruritus evaluation every 2 weeks over 3 months. The primary endpoint was the severity of pruritus evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Shiratori severity score. Secondary endpoints included white blood cell count (WBC), hemoglobin level (Hb), platelet count (Plt), serum albumin level (Alb), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), IL-6, dry weight (DW), and solute removal performance.

Results

The median VAS score was significantly decreased 2 weeks after switching compared with baseline (44 mm) and remained significantly decreased at Week 12 (22 mm; p < 0.01). From baseline to Week 12, 16 patients (80%) showed improvement in VAS score. The percentage of patients with mild to moderate daytime pruritus according to the Shiratori severity score decreased significantly from 80.0% to 45.0% (p < 0.05), whereas no significant change was observed for nighttime pruritus (p = 0.267). Pre-dialysis serum β2-MG levels were significantly higher at Week 12 compared with baseline. No significant changes were observed in WBC, Hb, Plt, serum Alb, hsCRP, IL-6, or DW.

Conclusions

OHDF with PMF-21A may be more effective in improving HAP.

Background

Hemodialysis-associated pruritus (HAP) is observed in 60–80% of hemodialysis patients and is a significant complication that not only decreases the quality of life through sleep disturbance and depression, but also leads to poor survival outcomes [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10].

Pruritus is classified as peripheral (cutaneous), central, neuropathic, and psychogenic. The main mechanisms of peripheral (cutaneous) pruritus include accumulation of pruritogens such as medium-to-high molecular weight substances, calcium, and phosphorus; excessive production of itch mediators such as histamine, substance P, and various inflammatory cytokines; and increased sensitivity to external stimuli due to dry skin, C-fiber elongation in the skin, decreased itch threshold, and skin hypersensitivity [11,12,13,14]. Central pruritus is associated with abnormal itch control within the central nervous system due to an abnormal endogenous opioid balance in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord and thalamus [15,16,17], astrocyte activation in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord [18], and other factors. The causes of neuropathic pruritus include abnormal excitation and hypersensitivity at sites of nerve damage/repair mediated by glutamic acid, substance P, and calcitonin gene-related peptide [19], while those of psychogenic pruritus include stress and depression [20].

HAP is often refractory to treatment, likely due to the combined involvement of more than one of the above mechanisms, and requires cause-specific and comprehensive treatment [10, 21,22,23,24,25]. Accumulation of pruritogenic medium to high molecular weight substances is a particularly important factor [26,27,28,29], and these substances should be actively eliminated by blood purification therapy.

The polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) membrane was the world's first synthetic polymer membrane for the hollow-fiber artificial kidney created in 1977. This membrane is highly biocompatible because it does not contain polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), a hydrophilic agent, or bisphenol A (BPA), which is derived from certain raw materials, and may inhibit the production of inflammatory cytokines. The membrane also has protein adsorption properties, even absorbing high molecular weight proteins such as β2-microglobulin (β2-MG), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α, and soluble CD40 ligand, while it exhibits excellent permeability to high molecular weight substances of size equivalent to or larger than albumin. PMMA membrane dialyzers have been reported to be effective for improving various complaints, including pruritus, and nutritional status [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. In Japan, a PMMA membrane hemodiafilter, Filtryzer® PMF™-A (PMF-A), was launched in November 2021 and has since become available for use in online hemodiafiltration (OHDF).

The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of PMF-A in OHDF would be effective for improving pruritus in hemodialysis patients.

Methods

Patients

This study involved 20 patients (14 male and 6 female) on predilution OHDF (pre-OHDF) or postdilution OHDF (post-OHDF) using an Asymmetric Triacetate (ATA) Membrane® hemodiafilter (FIX-210E eco or FIX-210S eco) who were experiencing pruritus of “very mild” or higher severity based on the Shiratori severity score either during the daytime or nighttime. Median [interquartile range (IQR)] age was 74.5 [64.5, 84.0] years and median [IQR] duration of dialysis was 5.0 [1.0, 9.3] years. Primary diseases included diabetes (n = 13), chronic glomerulonephritis (n = 3), nephrosclerosis (n = 2), and unknown (n = 2). The reason for selecting the ATA Membrane® hemodiafilter was to continue eliminating the effects of PVP and BPA on pruritus after the study began.

Study design

This study was a single-center, single-group, prospective, minimally invasive interventional study. Patients were switched from pre-OHDF or post-OHDF with FIX-210E eco or FIX-210S eco to post-OHDF with PMF-21A. The treatment conditions before the switch are shown in Table 1. The substitution flow rate was initially set at 10 L/session, and if there was no improvement in pruritus at pruritus assessments every 2 weeks, the rate was increased in increments of 2 L/session over a period of 3 months (Fig. 1). The substitution flow rate could be increased up to 20 L/session but was decreased if the serum albumin level (Alb) decreased below 3.0 g/dL. The upper limit of transmembrane pressure was set at 200 mmHg. The treatment time, number of dialysis sessions per week, blood flow rate, and dialysate flow rate were kept unchanged in principle. Although pre-existing antipruritic treatments were not changed in principle, dose reduction or discontinuation of antipruritic treatment was allowed if the pruritus improved.

Table 1 Treatment conditions before the switch to PMF-21A
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Protocol for changing treatment conditions. OHDF online hemodiafiltration; PMF-21A Filtryzer® PMF™-A

Full size image

The primary endpoint was severity of pruritus as assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS) [40,41,42,43] and the Shiratori severity score [44], as well as the percentage of patients using antipruritic treatments. Secondary endpoints included blood parameters (white blood cells [WBC], hemoglobin [Hb], and platelets [Plt]) and inflammation markers (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [hsCRP] and IL-6). Serum Alb, serum corrected calcium (Ca), serum inorganic phosphorus (IP), serum whole parathyroid hormone (whole PTH), dry weight (DW), and pre-dialysis serum β2-MG levels were also measured. To determine removal efficiency, the removal rates and amounts of blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), IP, β2-MG, and α1-microglobulin (α1-MG), and albumin leakage were measured before (baseline) and 12 weeks after the switch (Week 12).

For β2-MG and α1-MG, adsorption clearance, defined as the difference between blood-side clearance (CLB) and dialysate-side clearance (CLD) (CLB–CLD [mL/min]) [45], was calculated at 15, 60, 120 and 240 min into treatment to evaluate adsorption capacity. CLB (1) and CLD (2) were calculated using the following formulas, and the difference between them, that is, Eq. (1) minus Eq. (2), was calculated as the adsorption clearance.

$${\mathrm{C}}_{\mathrm{LB}}=\frac{{\mathrm{C}}_{\mathrm{Bi}}-{\mathrm{C}}_{\mathrm{Bo}}}{{\mathrm{C}}_{\mathrm{Bi}}}\times {\mathrm{Q}}_{\mathrm{B}}(\mathrm{mL}/\mathrm{min})$$
(1)
$${\mathrm{C}}_{\mathrm{LD}}=\frac{{\mathrm{C}}_{\mathrm{Do}}}{{\mathrm{C}}_{\mathrm{Bi}}}\times {\mathrm{Q}}_{\mathrm{D}}(\mathrm{mL}/\mathrm{min})$$
(2)

Here, CBi is the concentration at the hemodiafilter blood inlet [mg/mL], CDo, is the concentration at the hemodiafilter dialysate outlet [mg/mL], QB is the blood flow rate, and QD is the dialysate flow rate.

Evaluation of pruritus

The severity of pruritus, the primary endpoint, was evaluated using the VAS and Shiratori severity score. The VAS consisted of a horizontal line with “no pruritus (0 mm)” at the left end and “worst possible pruritus (100 mm)” at the right end, on which the patients drew a vertical line indicating the severity of the most intense pruritus they had recently experienced. The distance from the left end to the vertical line (mm) was determined.

The severity of pruritus based on the Shiratori severity score was evaluated separately for daytime and nighttime pruritus. Daytime pruritus was evaluated on the following 5-point scale: 0 = “No itching at all” (no symptoms), 1 = “Tolerable without scratching” (very mild), 2 = “Subsides after light scratching” (mild), 3 = “Subsides after considerable scratching” (moderate), and 4 = “Does not subside, prompting repeated scratching” (severe). Nighttime pruritus was evaluated on the following 5-point scale: 0 = “No itching at all” (no symptoms), 1 = “Slight itching at bedtime, but not to the extent that I consciously scratch; I sleep well” (very mild), 2 = “Some itching, but subsides after scratching; I don't wake up due to itchiness” (mild), 3 = “I wake up due to itching; I can fall asleep after scratching once but unconsciously scratch while asleep” (moderate), and 4 = “I can hardly sleep due to itching; I constantly scratch, but it makes me itchier” (severe).

Changes over time were investigated in the numbers of patients using moisturizers, topical steroids, other topical drugs, oral antihistamines, nalfurafine hydrochloride, and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor agonists for the treatment of pruritus.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the Jonckheere–Terpstra test, Cochran–Armitage test, Friedman test, Wilcoxon signed rank sum test, and paired-t test, with a significance level of < 5%. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 25.0 for Windows (IBM Japan, Inc., Tokyo, Japan).

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of Tsuchiya General Hospital (Approval No. E220328-5) and was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. After obtaining prior verbal consent from each patient enrolled in the study, informed consent was documented in writing in their medical record.

Results

Changes in pruritus

The median VAS score significantly decreased in 2 weeks after the switch compared with baseline (44 mm) and remained significantly decreased at Week 12 (22 mm; p < 0.01; Fig. 2). Looking at the individual changes in VAS score from baseline to Week 12, 16 patients had a decrease in VAS score, meaning that 80% of patients had improvement in pruritus. Two patients had an increase in VAS score, but by less than 10 mm (from 20 to 28 mm and from 14 to 23 mm, respectively; Fig. 3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Change over time in median visual analogue scale (VAS) score (n = 20)

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Individual changes in visual analogue scale (VAS) score (n = 20)

Full size image

According to the Shiratori severity score, no patient had severe pruritus from baseline through Week 12, and the percentage of patients with mild to moderate daytime pruritus decreased significantly from 80.0 to 45.0% (p < 0.05), but there was no significant change in nighttime pruritus (p = 0.267; Figs. 4 and 5).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Changes in Shiratori severity score for daytime pruritus (n = 20)

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Changes in Shiratori severity score for nighttime pruritus (n = 20)

Full size image

Change in use of antipruritic treatments

The number of patients using moisturizers was 14 (70.0%) at baseline and 13 (65.5%) at Week 12 (p = 0.669). Topical steroids were used by 13 patients (65.0%) at baseline and 11 (55.0%) at Week 12 (p = 0.477). The number of patients using other topical drugs was 2 (10.0%) at baseline and 2 (10.0%) at Week 12 (p > 0.999). Oral antihistamines were used by 4 patients (20.0%) at baseline and 3 (15.0%) at Week 12 (p = 0.599). The number of patients using nalfurafine hydrochloride was 6 (30.0%) at baseline and 5 (25.0%) at Week 12 (p = 0.823). GABA receptor agonists were used by 2 patients (10.0%) at baseline and 3 (15.0%) at Week 12 (p = 0.635). There were no significant changes over time in the percentage of patients using antipruritic treatments.

Changes in primary and secondary endpoints

The median [IQR] pre-dialysis serum β2-MG level was significantly higher at Week 12 (27.2 [21.8, 28.9] mg/L) compared with baseline (25.1 [19.7, 27.6] mg/L; p < 0.05). No significant changes were observed in other variables (WBC, Hb, Plt, serum Alb, corrected Ca, IP, whole PTH, hsCRP, IL-6, and DW; Table 2).

Table 2 Changes over time in secondary endpoints (n = 20)
Full size table

Removal efficiency

Removal efficiency was compared in two groups: patients who switched from FIX-210E eco to PMF-21A (group A) and those who switched from FIX-210S eco to PMF-21A (group B (Tables 3, 4). The mean (± standard deviation) substitution flow rate with PMF-21A at Week 12 was 14.8 ± 2.0 L/session for group A and 15.1 ± 2.2 L/session for group B. No significant differences were observed in the removal rate and amount of low molecular weight solutes (i.e., BUN, Cr, and IP). For β2-MG and α1-MG, the removal rate and the removal amount on the effluent side were significantly lower with PMF-21A. Albumin leakage was also significantly lower with PMF-21A.

Table 3 Comparison of removal rates for different solutes (n = 20)
Full size table
Table 4 Comparison of removal amounts for different solutes and albumin leakage (n = 20)
Full size table

Patients were divided into an improvement group with the 16 patients whose VAS score decreased and a non-improvement group with the 4 patients whose VAS score was unchanged or increased at Week 12, and the substitution flow rate (mean ± standard deviation) and removal rates of β2-MG and α1-MG (means ± standard deviations) were compared between the groups. The substitution flow rate at Week 12 was larger in the non-improvement group (16.5 ± 1.7 L/session) than in the improvement group (14.5 ± 1.9 L/session), although the difference between the groups was not significant (p = 0.088). The removal rates of β2-MG at baseline and Week 12 were 76.7 ± 5.6% and 70.5 ± 6.9%, respectively, in the improvement group, and 75.9 ± 5.0% and 69.4 ± 4.2%, respectively, in the non-improvement group: the removal rate was decreased at Week 12 compared with baseline in both groups. The removal rates of α1-MG at baseline and Week 12 were 28.0 ± 7.4% and 17.5 ± 5.1%, respectively, in the improvement group, while 30.4 ± 9.9% and 14.6 ± 2.9%, respectively, in the non-improvement group: the removal rate was decreased at Week 12 compared with baseline in both groups. The removal rates of β2-MG and α1-MG at Week 12 were not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.779 and p = 0.325, respectively).

Adsorption clearance

Adsorption clearance was evaluated for 6 of the 11 patients who switched from FIX-210S eco to PMF-21A and were matched for treatment conditions other than dilution mode and substitution flow rate. Comparisons were made under the following conditions: treatment time of 4 h, blood flow rate of 250 mL/min, total dialysate flow rate of 500 mL/min, and substitution flow rate of 48 L/session for pre-OHDF with FiX-210S eco and 14 L/session for post-OHDF with PMF-21A session.

With FIX-210S eco, the CLB and CLD for both β2-MG and α1-MG were almost identical from 15 min to 4 h after the start of treatment, giving no adsorption clearance (Fig. 6). In contrast, with PMF-21A, there were differences between CLB and CLD for both β2-MG and α1-MG, giving adsorption clearance of 83.9 ± 6.5 mL/min at 15 min, 72.2 ± 5.5 mL/min at 60 min, 63.4 ± 3.3 mL/min at 120 min, and 52.8 ± 5.2 mL/min at 240 min for β2-MG; and 6.9 ± 1.2 mL/min at 15 min, 6.3 ± 1.3 mL/min at 60 min, 6.0 ± 1.0 mL/min at 120 min, and 5.5 ± 1.1 mL/min at 240 min for α1-MG. The adsorption clearance of PMF-21A showed a decreasing trend over time but was maintained even at the end of treatment.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Comparison of adsorption clearance (n = 6). α1-MG α1-microglobrin, β2-MG β2-microglobrin, CL clearance, OHDF online hemodiafiltration, PMF-21A Filtryzer® PMF™-A, SD standard deviation

Full size image

Discussion

PMMA membrane hemodiafilters are characterized by adsorption due to the occlusion of protein molecules into pores of the homogeneous membrane structure, and are capable of removing high molecular weight substances that cannot be removed by permeation (diffusion and filtration), such as protein-bound uremic toxins. It also has a low complement activation potential and uses the same membrane surface modification technology as Filtriser NF® [36, 37] to both adsorb proteins and inhibit platelet adhesion, resulting in good biocompatibility. Its pore size is designed to be small, which can reduce albumin leakage. The homogeneous membrane structure and protein adsorption properties make the membrane less permeable than the polysulfone (PS) membrane and produce a lower ultrafiltration rate (UFR), making it unsuitable for high-volume pre-OHDF, as it is often associated with increased transmembrane pressure. However, it can be used under normal conditions in the postdilution mode. The PMMA membrane also has broad fractionation ranges; although its β2-MG removal performance is inferior to that of the PS membrane, it is capable of reducing amino acid leakage and removing high molecular weight substances.

Several centers have reported the following findings supporting the performance and usefulness of PMMA membrane hemodiafilters: (1) β2-MG and α1-MG are rarely detected in the dialysate and are removed mainly by adsorption; (2) there is no excessive albumin leakage in both pre- and post-OHDF and albumin leakage is kept low, ensuring safety; and (3) it is effective in improving complaints including pruritus and maintaining peripheral circulation during dialysis. Given these reports, we also examined whether the use of PMMA membrane hemodiafilters in post-OHDF improves pruritus in our hemodialysis patients.

The median VAS score at Week 12 was lower than that at baseline in 16 patients (80%), indicating improvement in pruritus. The proportion of patients with mild to moderate pruritus according to the Shiratori severity score decreased significantly for daytime pruritus, but not for nighttime pruritus. There were more patients with no or very mild pruritus at baseline, and fewer patients with mild and moderate pruritus at baseline during the nighttime than during the daytime. This may be a reason why there was no significant difference in nighttime pruritus after the switch.

To improve pruritus in hemodialysis patients on OHDF, it is important to actively remove pruritogenic medium to high molecular weight substances by high-volume pre-OHDF or post-OHDF. β2-MG (molecular weight, 11,800 Da) was shown to be a pruritogen in experiments using mice [46, 47], and may cause pruritus in humans as well. Furthermore, α1-MG (MW 33,000 Da) has been used as a surrogate marker for the removal of high molecular weight uremic toxins, and efficient removal of α1-MG has been associated with improved pruritus [48,49,50]. Recently, α1-MG has attracted attention for its antioxidant activity as a potent radical scavenger against oxidative stress caused by reactive oxygen species, and active removal of α1-MG is thought to not only result in the removal of uremic toxins in the molecular weight range of α1-MG, but also promote the turnover of α1-MG and its antioxidant action as a radical scavenger [18, 51,52,53,54,55]. Thus, to improve pruritus, the target values for treatment efficiency parameters should be set as follows: β2-MG removal rate of 80% or higher, and α1-MG removal rate of 30–40% (3 g albumin leakage). For refractory pruritus, an α1-MG removal rate of 40% or higher (albumin leakage of 5 g or higher) should be targeted [48,49,50, 56], and the use of hemodiafilters that do not contain pruritogenic substances, such as PVP and BPA, should also be considered [56].

In this study, 80% of patients had improvement in pruritus even though PMF-21A had lower removal rates of β2-MG and α1-MG compared with ATA Membrane® hemodiafilters. Also, the removal rates of β2-MG and α1-MG were decreased at Week 12 compared with baseline in both the group with and the group without improvement in pruritus, and there was no significant difference in the removal rates between the groups. Thus, the mechanism for improvement of pruritus by use of PMF-21A cannot be explained by the efficiency of β2-MG and α1-MG removal. Aoike et al. showed that the mechanism by which PMMA membrane dialyzers improve pruritus is that the PMMA membranes adsorb substances in a broader molecular weight range than PS membranes. They found a substance (not IgG) with a molecular weight similar to that of IgG (molecular weight, 160,000 Da) in the plasma of dialysis patients with pruritus that induced degranulation of rat mast cells (i.e., histamine release from the cells). They also found that degranulation did not occur when a solution containing this substance was exposed to a PMMA membrane dialyzer in vitro, indicating that a PMMA membrane dialyzer adsorbed this substance [33]. Although uncertain, a similar mechanism involving adsorptive removal of high molecular weight pruritogens may explain the improvement in pruritus with the use of PMF-21A.

Although β2-MG itself can be a pruritogen, the adsorption clearance for β2-MG and α1-MG was calculated to evaluate the adsorption capacity of PMF-21A for medium to high molecular weight substances. We found that β2-MG and α1-MG were removed when PMF-21A but not ATA Membrane® hemodiafilters were used, confirming adsorptive removal of these substances. Thus, we inferred that pruritogens were removed by adsorption to PMF-21A, resulting in improvement in pruritus. However, we examined adsorption clearance of these substances only, and whether PMF-21A can remove possible pruritogens with a higher molecular weight needs to be investigated.

Albumin leakage was lower with PMF-21A compared with ATA Membrane® hemodiafilters. Given that high-volume pre-OHDF and post-OHDF are associated with high albumin leakage, PMF-21A with low albumin leakage may be suitable for improving pruritus in undernourished or elderly patients with low serum Alb levels.

While improvement in pruritus was observed, an increase in serum β2-MG levels was observed at Week 12. This was likely due to decreased removal of β2-MG rather than increased production of β2-MG, given the significantly lower β2-MG removal rate of PMF-21A compared with ATA Membrane® hemodiafilters. Serum β2-MG levels have been suggested to be a prognostic factor and high serum β2-MG levels have been correlated with cardiovascular disease mortality and all-cause mortality [57, 58]. This suggests the need to monitor the change in serum β2-MG levels over time.

This study has several limitations. The first is the small sample size due to the single-center study design. The second is the single-group design without a control group, which precludes us from proving that PMF-21A was the most important factor for the improvement of HAP. Third, the study did not adequately evaluate the adsorption capacity of PMF-21A for pruritogenic high molecular weight substances, which is one of the mechanisms by which it improves pruritus. Fourth, although HAP involves a complex combination of multiple factors and requires cause-specific and comprehensive treatment strategies, the study could not examine the role of drug selection and skin care among those treatment strategies. Finally, it is desirable in the future to conduct a randomized controlled trial of long-term use of PMF-21A with monitoring of serum β2-MG levels over time.

Conclusion

OHDF with PMF-21A may be more effective in improving HAP.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

α1-MG:

α1-microglobrin

β2-MG:

β2-microglobrin

Alb:

Albumin level

ATA:

Asymmetric triacetate

BPA:

Bisphenol A

BUN:

Blood urea nitrogen

Cr:

Creatinine

GABA:

Gamma-aminobutyric acid

HAP:

Hemodialysis-associated pruritus

IL-6:

Interleukin-6

IP:

Inorganic phosphate

IQR:

Interquartile range

OHDF:

Online hemodiafiltration

PMMA:

Polymethylmethacrylate

post-OHDF:

Postdilution hemofiltration

pre-OHDF:

Predilution hemofiltration

PTH:

Parathyroid hormone

PVP:

Polyvinylpyrrolidone

VAS:

Visual analogue scale

References

  1. Pisoni RL, Wikström B, Elder SJ, Akizawa T, Asano Y, Keen ML, et al. Pruritus in haemodialysis patients: international results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). Nephrol Transplant. 2006;21:3495–505.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Narita I, Alchi B, Omori K, Sato F, Ajiro J, Saga D, et al. Etiology and prognostic significance of severe uremic pruritus in chronic hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2006;69:1626–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kimata N, Fuller DS, Saito A, Akizawa T, Fukuhara S, Pisoni RL, et al. Pruritus in hemodialysis patients: results from the Japanese Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (JDOPPS). Hemodial Int. 2014;18:657–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Remakrishnan K, Bond TC, Claxton A, Sood VC, Kootsikas M, Agnese W, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of end-stage renal disease patients with self-reported pruritus symptoms. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2014;7:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mathur VS, Lindberg J, Germain M, Block G, Tumlin J, Smith M, et al. ITCH National Registry Investigators: a longitudinal study of uremic pruritus in hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5:1410–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Shirazian S, Aina O, Park Y, Chowdhury N, Leger K, Hou L, et al. Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus: impact on quality of life and current management challenges. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2017;10:11–26.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Grochulska K, Ofenloch RF, Mettang T, Weisshaar E. Mortality of haemodialysis patients with and without chronic itch: a follow-up study of the German Epidemiological Hemodialysis Itch Study (GEHIS). Acta Derm Venereol. 2019;99:423–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sukul N, Karaboyas A, Csomor PA, Schaufler T, Wen W, Menzaghi F, et al. Self-reported pruritus and clinical, dialysis related, and patient-reported outcomes in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Med. 2020;3:42–53.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Lopes MB, Karaboyas A, Sukul N, Tsuruya K, Salmi IA, Asgari E, et al. Utility of a single itch-related 1uestion and the Skindex-10 1uestionnaire for assessing pruritus and predicting health-related quality of life in patients receiving hemodialysis. Kidney Med. 2022;4:100476.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahdoota RS, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Burtonc JO, Lockwood MB. Novel approach to unpleasant symptom clusters surrounding pruritus in patients with chronic kidney disease and on dialysis therapy. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2022;31:63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Johnasson O, Hilliges M, Ståhle-Bäckdahl M. Intraepidermal neuron-specific enolase (NSE)-immunoreactive nerve fibres: evidence for sprouting in uremic patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Neurosci Lett. 1989;99:281–6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tominaga M, Ozawa S, Tengara S, Ogawa H, Takamori K. Intraepidermal nerve fibers increase in dry skin of acetone-treated mice. J Dermatol Sci. 2007;48:103–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tominaga M, Ogawa H, Takamori K. Decreased production of semaphorin 3A in the lesional skin of atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2008;158:842–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tengara S, Tominaga M, Kamo A, Taneda K, Negi O, Ogawa H, et al. Keratinocyte-derived anosmin-1, an extracellular glycoprotein encoded by the X-linked Kallmann syndrome gene, is involved in modulation of epidermal nerve density in atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol Sci. 2010;58:64–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumagai H, Saruta T, Matsukawa S, Utsumi J. Prospects for a novel κ-opioid receptor agonist, TRK-820, in uremic pruritus Itch: basic mechanisms and therapy. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2004. p. 279–86.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kumagai H, Ebata T, Takamori K, Muramatsu T, Nakamoto H, Suzuki H. Effect of a novel kappa-receptor agonist, nalfurafine hydrochloride, on severe itch in 337 haemodialysis patients: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25:1251–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wieczorek A, Krajewski P, Kozioł-Gałczyńska M, Szepietowski JC. Opioid receptors expression in the skin of hemodialysis patients suffering from uremic pruritus. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34:2368–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. KimSTArchivesRelease. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/user/KimSTArchivesRelease. Accessed 12 Mar 2023.

  19. Simonsen E, Komenda P, Lerner B, Askin N, Bohm C, Shaw J, et al. Treatment of uremic pruritus: a systematic review. Am J Kidney Dis. 2017;70:638–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamamoto Y, Hayashino Y, Yamazaki S, Aklba T, Aklzawa T, Asano Y, for the J·DOPPS Research Groupe, et al. Depressive symptoms predict the future risk of severe pruritus in haemodialysis patients: Japan Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. Br J Dermatol. 2009;161:384–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Takahashi N, Yoshizawa T, Kumagai J, Kawanishi H, Tsuchiya S, Moriishi M, et al. Effectiveness of a treatment algorithm for hemodialysis-associated pruritus in terms of changes in medications. Ren Replace Ther. 2021;7:24.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Takahashi N, Yoshizawa T, Kumagai J, Kawanishi H, Moriishi M, Masaki T, et al. Response of patients with hemodialysis-associated pruritus to new treatment protocol with nalfurafine hydrochloride: a retrospective survey-based study. Ren Replace Ther. 2016;2:27.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Simonsen E, Komenda P, Lerner B, Askin N, Bohm C, Shaw J, et al. Treatment of uremic pruritus: a systematic review. Am J Kidney Dis. 2017;70:638–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Suzuki H, Omata H, Kumagai H. Recent advances in treatment for uremic pruritus. Open J Nephrol. 2015;5:1–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mettang T, Kremer AE. Uremic pruritus. Kidney Int. 2015;87:685–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vanholder R, De Smet R, Glorieux G, Argilés A, Baurmeister U, Brunet P, et al. Review on uremic toxins: classification, concentration, and interindividual variability. Kidney Int. 2003;63:1934–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vanholder R, Glorieux G, De Smet R, Lameire N, for the European Uremic Toxin Work Group (EUTOX). New insights in uremic toxins. Kidney Int. 2003;63(Suppl 84):S6-10.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Duranton F, Cohen G, De Smet R, Rodriguez M, Jankowski J, Vanholder R, et al. Normal and pathologic concentrations of uremic toxins. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;23:1258–70.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Rosner MH, Reis T, Husain-Syed F, Vanholder R, Hutchison C, Stenvinkel P, et al. Classification of uremic toxins and their role in kidney failure. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021;16:1918–28.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Masakane I. High-quality dialysis: a lesson from the Japanese experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant Plus. 2010;3(Suppl 1):i28-35.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kato A, Takita T, Furuhashi M, Takahashi T, Watanabe T, Maruyama Y, et al. Polymethylmethacrylate efficacy in reduction of renal itching in hemodialysis patients: crossover study and role of tumor necrosis factor-α. Artif Organs. 2001;25:441–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lin HH, Liu YL, Liu JH, Chou CY, Yang YF, Kuo HL, et al. Uremic pruritus, cytokines, and polymethylmethacrylate artificial kidney. Artif Organs. 2008;32:468–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Aoike I. Clinical significance of protein adsorbable membranes-long-term clinical effects and analysis using a proteomic technique. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007;22:13–9.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Aucella F, Vigilante M, Gesuete A. Review: the effect of polymethylmethacrylate dialysis membranes on uraemic pruritus. Nephrol Dial Transplant Plus. 2010;3(Suppl 1):i8-11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Uchiumi N, Sakuma K, Sato S, Matsumoto Y, Kobayashi H, Toriyabe K, et al. The clinical evaluation of novel polymethyl methacrylate membrane with a modified membrane surface: a multicenter pilot study. Ren Replac Ther. 2018;4:32.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Oshihara W, Fujieda H, Ueno Y. A new poly(methyl methacrylate) membrane dialyzer, NF, with adsorptive and antithrombotic properties. Contrib Nephrol. 2017;189:230–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Torii Y, Yamada S, Yajima M, Sugata T. Polymethylmethacrylate membrane dialyzer: historic but modern. Blood Purif. 2022;51(Suppl 2023):1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Masakane I, Yamaguchi I, Matsumoto Y, Ataka K, Oyama Y, Nagaoka M, et al. Clinical advantages of a newly launched anti-thrombotic PMMA membrane for the nutritional status and dialysis-related symptoms in older chronic dialysis patients: a multicenter pilot study. Ren Ren Replac Ther. 2021;7:31.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Chida T, Igarashi H, Masakane I. New polymethylmethacrylate membrane, NF-U, improves nutritional status and reduces patient-reported symptoms in older dialysis patients. Ren Replac Ther. 2022;8:11.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Furue M, Ebata T, Ikoma A, Takeuchi S, Kataoka Y, Takamori K, et al. Verbalizing extremes of the visual analogue scale for pruritus: a consensus statement. Acta Derm Venereol. 2013;93:214–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005;14:798–804.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Reich A, Heisig M, Phan NQ, Taneda K, Takamori K, Takeuchi S, et al. Visual analogue scale: evaluation of the instrument for the assessment of pruritus. Acta Derm Venereol. 2012;92:497–501.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Phan NQ, Blome C, Fritz F, Gerss J, Reich A, Ebata T, et al. Assessment of pruritus intensity: prospective study on validity and reliability of the visual analogue scale, numerical rating scale and verbal rating scale in 471 patients with chronic pruritus. Acta Derm Venereol. 2012;92:502–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Shiratori A. Therapeutic outcomes of the use of mequitazine (LM-209) in severe dermatological diseases. Nishinihon J Dermatol. 1983;45:470–3 ((in Japanese)).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Yamashita A, Tomisawa N. Importance of membrane materials for blood purification devices in critical care. Transfus Apher Sci. 2009;40:23–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Andoh T, Maki T, Li S, Uta D. β2-microglobulin elicits itch-related responses in mice through the direct activation of primary afferent neurons expressing transient receptor potential vanilloid 1. Eur J Pharmacol. 2017;810:134–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Li S, Andoh T, Zhang Q, Uta D, Kuraishi Y. β2-Microglobulin, interleukin-31, and arachidonic acid metabolites (leukotriene B4 and thromboxane A2) are involved in chronic renal failure-associated itch-associated responses in mice. Eur J Pharmacol. 2019;847:19–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sakurai K. Biomarkers for evaluation of clinical outcomes of hemodiafiltration. Blood Purif. 2013;35(Suppl 1):64–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Yamashita CA, Sakurai K. Clinical effect of pre-dilution hemodiafiltration based on the permeation of the hemodiafilter. Contrib Nephrol. 2015;185:1–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Masakane I, Sakurai K. Current approaches to middle molecule removal: room for innovation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2018;33(Suppl 3):312–21.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Allhorn M, Berggård T, Nordberg J, Olsson ML, Åkerström B. Processing of the lipocalin α1-microglobulin by hemoglobin induces heme-binding and heme-degradation properties. Blood. 2002;99:1894–901.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Meining W, Skerra A. The crystal structure of human α1-microglobulin reveals a potential haem-binding site. Biochem J. 2012;445:175–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Olsson MG, Allhorn M, Bülow L, Hansson SR, Ley D, Olsson ML, et al. Pathological conditions involving extracellar hemoglobin: molecular mechanisms, clinical signifcance, and novel therapeutic opportunities for α(1)-microglobulin. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2012;17:813–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Åkerström B, Gram M. A1M, an extravascular tissue cleaning and housekeeping protein. Free Radic Biol Med. 2014;74:274–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Kristiansson A, Bergwik J, Alattar AG, Flygare J, Gram M, Hansson SR, et al. Human radical scavenger α1-microglobulin protects against hemolysis in vitro and α1-microglobulin knockout mice exhibit a macrocytic anemia phenotype. Free Radic Biol Med. 2021;162:149–59.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Takahashi N, Yoshizawa T, Tsuchiya S. Current status and treatment strategies of hemodialysis-associated pruritus. Contrib Nephrol. 2018;196:88–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Liabeuf S, Lenglet A, Desjardins L, Neirynck N, Glorieuxet G, Lemkeal H-D, et al. Plasma beta-2 microglobulin is associated with cardiovascular disease in uremic patients. Kidney Int. 2012;82:1297–303.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Kanda E, Muenz D, Bieber B, Cases A, Locatelli F, Port FK, et al. Beta-2 microglobulin and all-cause mortality in the era of high-flux hemodialysis: results from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. Clin Kidney J. 2021;14:1436–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to all the medical staff who participated in this study.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Akane-Foundation Omachi Tsuchiya Clinic, 2-8-35 Omachi Higashi, Asa Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 731-0124, Japan

    Naoko Takahashi, Jun Mano, Kenta Uchida, Taku Yoshizawa & Junko Kumagai

  2. Department of Artificial Organs, Akane-Foundation, Tsuchiya General Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan

    Hideki Kawanishi & Shinichiro Tsuchiya

  3. Akane-Foundation Nakajima Tsuchiya Clinic, Hiroshima, Japan

    Misaki Moriishi

  4. Department of Nephrology, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan

    Takao Masaki

Authors
  1. Naoko Takahashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jun Mano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kenta Uchida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Taku Yoshizawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Junko Kumagai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hideki Kawanishi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shinichiro Tsuchiya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Misaki Moriishi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Takao Masaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NT conceived the study and wrote the first draft of this manuscript. JM, KU, and TY contributed to the study design, coordinated the study, and conducted the statistical analysis. JK, HK, ST, MM, and TM contributed to the study design and were involved in the production of the first draft of parts of this manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naoko Takahashi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of Tsuchiya General Hospital (Approval No. E220328-5) and was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. After obtaining prior verbal consent from each patient enrolled in the study, informed consent was documented in writing in their medical record.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takahashi, N., Mano, J., Uchida, K. et al. Efficacy of polymethylmethacrylate membrane hemodiafilter Filtryzer® PMF™-21A in improving pruritus in hemodialysis patients: a prospective interventional study. Ren Replace Ther 9, 39 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41100-023-00495-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41100-023-00495-y

Keywords

Renal Replacement Therapy

ISSN: 2059-1381

Contact us